LAKEPORT, Calif. – With the state's judicial branch facing budget cuts and shortfalls, a working group is proposing cost reductions and measures that may delay some new courthouse projects – including Lakeport's.
The 25-member Court Facilities Working Group, appointed last July by California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye to oversee the judicial branch’s facilities program, met Oct. 19-20.
The group discussed how to move forward on 41 courthouse projects around the state after more than $500 million in facility funding was moved to the state general fund, borrowed or redirected for court operations this fiscal year.
The Administrative Office of the Courts reported that since 2009 more than $1.1 billion in funding originally designated for courthouse construction has been borrowed, swept to the general fund or redirected to court operations.
The state judicial branch is proposing to build a new 50,000-square-foot, $55 million courthouse in Lakeport at 675 Lakeport Blvd.
A new courthouse for Lakeport has been included on a short list of critical projects because of the safety concerns and space limitations of the Lake County Superior Court's cramped quarters on the fourth floor of the Lake County Courthouse, located at 255 N. Forbes St.
The working group is recommending that the Judicial Council direct the Administrative Office of the Courts to continue work on all courthouse projects except two one-courtroom courthouses in Alpine and Sierra counties, that have a combined expense of nearly $50 million.
Most projects eligible to proceed to the final phase of architectural design before construction would do so, but the Administrative Office of the Courts said projects in Lake, Fresno and Riverside counties may be delayed a few months.
Other projects that are moving to site acquisition would complete that process, although two sites in Los Angeles County may see delays of as much as six months, the state reported. There also may be delays for projects preparing to move into architectural design.
Administrative Presiding Justice Brad R. Hill of the Fifth Appellate District Court of Appeal, the working group's chair, said a “significant budget gap” has to be closed in the courthouse construction program for this fiscal year.
“At the same time, the working group feels strongly that we must maintain our commitment to facilities infrastructure, as improvements are urgently needed statewide,” said Hill. “We believe these recommendations achieve that balance.”
The working group received hundreds of pages of feedback after soliciting written comments from the public and the 34 courts that have projects to be funded by Senate Bill 1407, which establishes a funding stream for such projects based on court fines and penalties, according to the Administrative Office of the Courts.
A letter submitted to the group by Lake County Superior Court Presiding Judge David Herrick and Court Executive Officer Mary Smith pointed to the inadequacies of the Lakeport court facilities, which squeeze four courtrooms, 39 staff, four judicial officers and the public into 15,000 square feet of space.
The letter said there is a “desperate need” for the new Lakeport courthouse because of inadequate security, overcrowding, and the building's poor physical condition and maintenance issues.
“As a small underfunded court with an annual budget of approximately $4 million, we are unable to save enough money for the recommended reserves, much less save enough money to complete this project on our own,” Herrick and Smith wrote.
They also said they were “gravely concerned” about delaying the new building because of the great risk of SB 1407 funds being “borrowed.”
The Lakeport courthouse is ready to move forward to completion on time in late 2014, the letter stated.
At last week's working group meeting, Hill appointed a new subcommittee to review projects still in their preliminary phases in order to look for significant cost reductions – as long as the reductions do not compromise public safety or security.
The working group’s recommendations are expected to be considered by the Judicial Council at its Dec. 13, meeting.
The council can accept, modify or reject the recommendations, which will be posted on the California Courts Web site at www.courts.ca.gov/policyadmin-jc.htm.
E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .
092211 Lake County Superior Court Letter to State