Vitriolic, that’s the word.

Have you been watching the comments made on or about articles written? Sounds like some of you have been in Washington, D.C. as politicians, folks with anger issues and those who just can’t give truthful, verifiable facts, and just the facts.

Case in point, the recent murder in Clearlake Oaks: Just take a look at all the misinformation and vitriol that is spewed from some folks. We all have things that make us angry, hurt and downright ticked off. Does this mean that we have to direct highly personal put-downs towards one another?

There is enough negativity in this world and some of our writers seem intent on producing more of the same. What’s going on? Why the mean spirited speech? I was under the impression that the purpose of responding to articles was: to add additional legitimate (correct) information, offer differing opinions, in which case we are all entitled to do. Even the addition of sympathy for some, outrage at others is allowed. However, is there a need for this constant vitriol?

There is plenty to be angry about in this world, but finding only derogatory means to express yourself leaves much to be desired. I enjoy a qualified debate or a personal commentary, which is what makes life interesting.

I read constantly about the youth in our communities, adults in our communities being referred to as “punks,” “illiterate,” “trash” and many other snide references. Where do you think that some of them get their thought processes from? Reading some of YOUR comments, that’s where.

If you expect to change things, lead by example not by trash talk. If someone’s opinion doesn’t meet with yours, find a civil way to express yourself. Hot-tempered, hot-headed, derogatory remarks do not get the job done. They merely give us a more complete view of the person making the comment.

I would venture to think that some of you, in fact most of you, have never even met the person you are tearing down. I know I haven’t. From what authority can you make these comments? There has been a steady downward trend in constructive criticism and reporting of the facts by individual respondents in the comments sections of these articles. How many of you have read the “terms of use” guidelines?

Please clean it up. You are setting examples for others to follow. You want respect for your opinions; try common decency when commenting about others. Things upset you; find better ways to get your point across. Personal attacks on others will only lead to personal attacks upon you. I guess you get what you deserve?

Civil discourse is the way our forefathers dealt with issues. It is even the way they came about writing our Constitution. It is the way of civilized people throughout the world. Statesmanship is comparable to sportsmanship! (Technical foul – one shot, personal foul – 15 yards.)

This is just my take on what I have been reading of late. I may be wrong about my conclusions but I doubt it. If I am, PLEASE, find an appropriate way to voice your differing opinion, if you expect me to respond.

John Pavoni lives in Clearlake Oaks.