Thompson votes for oil companies to 'use it or lose it'
Written by Editor   
Monday, 30 June 2008
WASHINGTON Last Thursday night, Congressman Mike Thompson voted for legislation requiring oil companies to drill for oil on the U.S. land they have already leased, rather than expand drilling into new areas.


Currently, oil and gas companies hold leases to drill on nearly 90 million acres of federal land. Of that, nearly 70 million acres – an area the size of Colorado – are not being touched, despite estimates that they contain 80 percent of oil and gas reserves on federal lands.


The “Use It or Lose It” bill (HR 6251), co-sponsored by Congressman Mike Thompson, gives oil companies an incentive to explore already available lands, rather than try to open new areas off the Outer Continental Shelf or in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to exploration.


Although the bill garnered a majority of support, it needed a two-thirds majority to pass. It will be voted on again after the July 4th congressional recess.


“When we sit atop only 2 percent of the world’s oil supply, but consume a quarter of the world’s supply, it’s clear we can’t drill our way out of the fuel crisis,” said Thompson. “However, we can encourage drilling on the land we’ve already leased to oil companies, much of which they aren’t currently using. There is no reason to expand drilling to new areas – areas that could suffer devastating environmental consequences – when oil companies aren’t using the land they have.”


Oil from already leased land can come on line much faster than any newly leased land. It’s estimated that oil from new areas such as the Outer Continental Shelf or ANWR could take up to 10 years to reach the market.


“Utilizing existing leases is only one part of a much-needed comprehensive energy policy,” said Thompson. “We also need to consider other short-term solutions like releasing a small portion of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and cracking down on unregulated oil speculators who are artificially inflating the price of oil.”


“We also need to continue investing in long-term solutions, like renewable energy, fuel efficient vehicles, public transportation, incentives for homes and businesses that use solar, wind and biomass and research of other energy technologies,” Thompson said.


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (6)Add Comment
Band wagon buddies
written by DDean, June 30, 2008
Recently McCain and Obama talked of drilling for oil in the good old U.S.of A.Now Mike Thompson.The U.S hasn't built a new refinery in thirty years.Your BS really sounds hollow.As Americans isn't their a way to remove these weasels from office.Oh right, too much trouble.Were all tired from work,so kick back down a few beers,turn on the tube.Everyting will be al-right,except that Financial freight train about to derail.Increase your stores.God bless
Lack of info
written by ron_b, July 01, 2008
I can't find any information on why the oil companies are not using this resource. I'd like to know if the existing leases are viable, in which case the oil companies are screwing us, or if they are not,then the Democrats are. You can bet somebody is.
...
written by jmadison, July 02, 2008
Please tell us who we should replace te weasles with. Will building refineries solve the problem? Solve the financial problems?
Whats wrong with a few beers while we wait?
...
written by James, July 07, 2008
I donot see this government promoting the general welfare. It has been one sided far to long. This system has been created by them to serve them for their good and has came about over time by bureaucrats so they have a more perfect union for them. We are shackled by their greed, power the arrogance of their will. Do I have hope? Nope the corruption is complete. What we were is gone what we will become is on the way.
Oil Company experience
written by arttow, July 09, 2008
Why does Mike Thompson think he knows how to run a oil company? His bill is just an effort to stop drilling in ANWAR or the outer continental shelf. The oil spill scare is a BS argument. Katrina and Rita destoyed many rigs in the Gulf of Mexico but no spills. Oil companies are not using current leases because the conditions are so onerus. Mike just wants to add further impediments to exploration. No wonder only 9% think congress is doing a good or excellant job.
Pale ale\'s my choice
written by DDean, July 09, 2008
jmadson- Nothing wrong with a few cold ones.As for who we should replace these weasels with.Homer Simpson would be a better choice than McCain or Obama, how about Ron Paul or Bob Barr.I like the idea of reducing big government,dumping the federal reserve and getting out of the United Nations. Couldnt be any worse.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy