Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Sailboat accident defendant in court PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Saturday, 09 June 2007

THIS STORY HAS BEEN UPDATED AND CLARIFIED WITH INFORMATION ON BOATING SPEED LAWS AND THE CHARGING DECISION.


LAKEPORT – A Carmichael man facing vehicle manslaughter and boating under the influence charges in connection with an April 2006 boating collision was in Superior Court Friday morning.


Bismarck Dinius, 39, is being held responsible for an April 29, 2006, accident on Clear Lake that fatally injured a passenger on the sailboat he was operating.


Dinius was operating Beats Working II, 27-foot sailboat owned by Mark Weber of Willows after 9 p.m. when the sailboat was hit by a 24-foot powerboat driven by Russell Perdock, a chief deputy with the Lake County Sheriff's Office.


Weber's fiancee, Lynn Thornton, 51, of Willows, was seriously injured in the collision and died several days later at UC Davis Medical Center.


Initial reports from the Lake County Sheriff's Office said the sailboat was operating without running lights, and that both Dinius and Weber had blood alcohol levels above the legal limit.


District Attorney Jon Hopkins said on Friday that he filed the charges against Dinius – felony vehicular manslaughter involving a vessel and misdemeanor boating under the influence of alcohol – several weeks ago.


The case was delayed, he said, because he forwarded it to the California Attorney General's Office to ask for an opinion on whether or not his office should be recused from the prosecution due to its close working relationship with the sheriff's office.


The Attorney General's Office ruled there was no reason for Hopkins' office not to prosecute it, and sent the case back to Lake County.


Hopkins said that process took a while, as did tracking down a couple who were on the sailboat with Dinius, Weber and Thornton. In addition, he said Weber's attorney provided the District Attorney's Office with reports made by insurance company investigators that purportedly turned up more witnesses and evidence.


“We then needed to stop and track all of that down,” Hopkins said.


Perdock, said Hopkins, was off duty and driving his own boat when the accident happened.


As to Perdock's speed at the time of the collision, Hopkins said his office has not been able to make a determination on that point.


“It was impossible to tell” how fast Perdock was traveling, said Hopkins, with witness estimates varying widely.


The powerboat was traveling fast enough that it hit the sailboat and was propelled over it, Hopkins explained.


There is no “maximum” speed limit on the lake, said Hopkins, either from a local jurisdiction or as outlined in the Harbors and Navigation Code.


There is a separate issue of a “safe speed,” which a 2007 publication, The ABCS of Boating Law, published by the state's Department of Boating and Water Ways, explains this way: “A safe speed should be maintained at all times so that: a) action can be taken to avoid collision and b) the boat can stop within a distance appropriate to the prevailing circumstances and conditions. In restricted visibility, motorboats should have the engines ready for immediate maneuvering. An operator should be prepared to stop the vessel within the space of half the distance of forward visibility.”


However, that “safe speed” law also does not affix a specific speed limit, said Hopkins.


Besides that, even using the safe speed evaluation, investigators still cannot determine Perdock's speed at collision, said Hopkins.


Neither can they prove that he is guilty – beyond a reasonable doubt – of criminal negligence, especially if, as Hopkins alleges, the sailboat did not have any lights on.


On Friday, Dinius' attorney, Victor Haltom of Sacramento, didn't enter a plea for his client, said Hopkins. Instead, Haltom requested that arraignment be set for July 13 in order to give him a chance to review the case.


According to the California Penal Code, vehicular manslaughter while under the influence of alcohol can carry a sentence of as many as four years in state prison.


Deputy District Attorney David McKillop is prosecuting Dinius, said Hopkins.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (1 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (7)Add Comment
right of way
written by rudy, June 09, 2007
Was the sailboat under sail power? If it was I thought sailboats had the right of way.

Was the sailboat sailing a steady course?

9pm is still dusk. Running lights?

does the alcohol level releive the speedboat of all responsibilty?

Is there more here than meets the eye?
Oh Yeah!
written by smurf, June 09, 2007
tell me how it can't be negligance on the power boat operator's part when he doesn't see a 27 foot long sailboat under FULL sail and he broadsides it? If it's dark then you shouldn't be going so fast or paying so little attention that you can't avoid this kind of accident-period. Nice of them to rig the investigation too, by having Mitchell's Sacramento do it. And Hopkins claiming that the speed (estimated by some at 40 mph) didn't matter was classic, just business as usual here in the land of law and disorder (the same thing now),Lake County CA.
speed is relevant
written by number1, June 11, 2007
Pardon me but speed is relevant in this case (without knowing all the facts)because regardless of specific speed limits, the law states that boats (and cars) must be operated in a safe manner for prevailing conditions. I am very knowledgable of boating at night and with background lighting (as along the shoreline of Konocti Bay) a boat is very difficult to see, with or without running lights, as the boat's lights blend into the background lights. Running at high rates of speed (e.g. 40 mph is very fast) is unsafe in such areas. The speed of the powerboat could very well be a contributing factor to this accident. DA Hopkins is being negligent in ignoring the speed of the powerboat.
shame!
written by smurf, June 12, 2007
Hopkins and Mitchell are both trying to rig this deal, because saving the behind of one of their own is more important than being fair and honest. Number 1 is right about background lights making it hard for you to see running lights, I've done a lot of night flying and had the same problem over populated areas trying to spot other aircraft, it's VERY difficult at times. And how is it that Hopkins can't figure out what the state law on boat speed limits is? Jon is a smart guy, this is more proof this is a miscarraige of justice.
...
written by Donna Christopher, June 12, 2007
It's mighty hard to keep your faith in local law enforcement when they don't know what the law is. Excuse my ignorance but being the District Attorney means you are this countys' top law enforcement officer, doesn't that imply you know what the laws are? May I suggest more time in the law library and less time on the guitar?
...
written by Tony, August 27, 2007
Recent articles on this incident indicate the District Attorney is under fire. The facts will prevail and justice will be served.
things that will come into pla
written by Caligirlstuckintx, October 05, 2007
Sailboats do have the right of way, safe speed laws do come into play, and while in court a few other things will come into play, such as Perdock wasn't tested for his blood alcohol level until almost 24 hrs later... LC sheriff's department tried to say that it happend around 11:30 the night of the accident and the date was just mirswrote, yet whitnesses say perdock was at the scene until past midnight. Another thing that will come into play... officers refused to take some whitness statements... Statements that say things like oh, i don't know, "the sail boat lights WERE in fact on" Right now, the defendant and other parties are suing to get this removed and placed into an unbiased jurisdiction. This makes them look sue happy, but hopefully they can get it moved. From what I understand the family of the lady who died is outraged by the fact that Dinius is being charged, and they do not blame him at all. It is very unfortunate that he is being charged with something that there is no way he could have prevented. It's obvious that the incident was Perdock's fault; the people on the sail boat agree, and the family of Lynn Thorton agree. The only people disagreeing are the DA and Mr. Perdock... hmmm... seem odd that they are the only ones??? anyone with half a brain could read the facts and figure out who is liable... this is just an example of the cops looking out for their own.


ABC 7 has a great write and investigative video clip on this story as well.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 15 June 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.054239988327 Seconds