Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Konocti Unified approves $27.2 million budget PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Tuesday, 30 June 2009
LOWER LAKE – With Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger issuing ominous warnings hours before that he intended to veto any budget that increases taxes or takes a “piecemeal” approach to solving the state's budget crisis, Konocti Unified School District trustees spent Monday evening hammering out a final budget for the 2009-10 fiscal year.


After three hours and 15 minutes of discussion, which included going through a list of contingency items and making choices to reach an additional $1.9 million in savings, the board voted unanimously to accept the proposed budget.


For board members and district administrators, the challenges were many – chiefly, that funds for education are dwindling.


The district's 2009-10 budget is $27.2 million, down 3.4 percent from the $28.1 million budgeted for the previous budget year.


But they were also tasked with accepting the district's budget when the state budget – on which so much depends for local school districts – isn't itself in a final form, and doesn't appear to be nearing finality for some time.


Although the state Legislature is due to present a budget document Tuesday, Schwarzenegger was adamant that any budget that didn't have the state living within its means would die on his desk.


“We do not have time for any more floor drills or partial solutions,” he said in a Monday statement. “It's time for the legislature to send me a budget that solves our entire deficit without raising taxes.”


But districts must have their budgets done in time for the beginning of the new fiscal year, which arrives this Wednesday, July 1.


“We need to adopt a budget tonight even though we don't have very good role models at the state,” said Laurie Altic, Konocti Unified's business manager.


The half-inch-thick budget document that Altic presented to the district board was the results of months of work and weeks of fine tuning, with new information coming in daily – even hourly, she said.


What board members had before them Monday represented the information they had as of Saturday night, when Altic finished recalculations based on a packet of information from the state that was delivered last Thursday.


“It has been the most difficult budget year that I've ever faced,” she said.


Altic said she kept the district's goals – established at Jan. 24 workshop – on the wall in her office as she crafted the document. Those goals include intervention, safety, class size reduction and classroom personnel.


Board members emphasized Monday that they wanted to keep cuts as far away from classrooms as possible.


The budget they accepted is based on the governor's May revise. Board Clerk Anita Gordon asked if that was the worst case scenario.


“Absolutely,” replied Superintendent Dr. Bill MacDougall.


Under the governor's May revise, the district is looking at a 65-percent reduction – or $568,000 – in home to school transportation funds. If the Legislature's current proposal were to survive the threatened veto, close to $300,000 would be added back to those funds, Altic said.


Legislative proposals for schools also include a five-day reduction to the school year and suspending the California High School Exit Exam, which students must pass before graduating.

.

The district's projected deficit spending in the 2009-10 fiscal year “is the most pronounced suffered by the district,” with expenditures and transfers exceeding income by $1.4 million, Altic wrote in the introduction to the budget.


Konocti Unified is getting some help from Stabilization and and Special Education funding supplied through the federal stimulus, Altic explained.


Those funds are included in the $2.9 million positive ending balance for 2008-09, which will be carried forward to balance the coming year's budget, projected to have an ending balance of $1.5 million – most of which will be stimulus money, according to Altic's budget analysis.


Altic said the state also requires the district to keep a 3-percent “reserve for economic uncertainty” – which in this case totals approximately $832,495.


Under the Legislature's proposed budget, school districts would be able to operate with only a 1-percent reserve for the 2009-10 and 2010-11 budget years.


However, Altic emphasized to the board that once that money is spent, it's gone, and the state will require them to provide a strategy for recovering that 3-percent reserve. If no new revenues are coming into the district, Altic said it would require further cuts ahead to rebuild the fund.


That money, she added, also serves as an important cushion for the district.


The silver lining for the district is that they've been able to hire back all but two of the 53 teachers who received layoff notices in March, said MacDougall. They also have given notices of release to eight administrators, and hired back seven.


In addition, MacDougall said they realized a savings of $522,000 with the closure of Oak Hill Middle School, approved by the board in March.


On Monday at 4 p.m., the portable buildings that housed Highlands High School at the district offices left to be transported to the district's elementary schools, where MacDougall said they'll be used to work with children with greater educational needs.


Meantime, Highlands High School will be moved to Oak Hill, where a number of other alternative education and social programs will be housed, MacDougall said.


Board members requested that MacDougall place a discussion on an upcoming meeting agenda to look at consolidation. Trustees Gordon, Hank Montgomery and Carolynn Jarrett all said that they've been talking about service consolidations for a long time, and the time has come to do something.


Jarrett also questioned why consolidation didn't play a bigger part in the budget itself.


They're planning to have a discussion and direct MacDougall to bring back recommendations at a later date.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Trackback(0)
Comments (4)Add Comment
Consolidate School Districts and Save Ideas from an informed School Teacher of Lake County
written by Reflective, June 30, 2009
If the fefedom of the School Districts around Lake county would be consolidated I would save a bank full of money. Why should the teachers suffer by using their money, and I mean their money for classrooms to pay for multiple districts, 6 I believe,. The Principals make over 6 figures, you can imagine what the top administrators make. The county would also save money on the full Administrative staffs that support these redununt services. Counties like Sandiego Unified and Los Angeles get along without multiple districts why no Lake County. Were much much smaller. Why is it that when the County Supervisors recomend consolidation and an outside source do it the Lake County School Distict was chosen to police the henhouse. Could it be the loss of income these Administrators would lose. We stoped the double dipping a few years ago but some of it still goes on. A consolidated school district would do it. And we could hire truly qualified persons to upgrade our schools.

Reflect on it
Get Vocal with your local County Supervisors and School Districts.

Yours Truly
Reflective
Consolidation didn't play a bigger part? No.....
written by cale_page, June 30, 2009
Maybe because nothing was consolidated. Four schools were expanded and no school was closed. Oak hill becomes another hideout for our misguided and our outstanding students get to bear the suffering. Our childrens education, athletics, and general school activities , all of which were on the rise, are now on the brink failure. But MacDougal got his school, which I hope they put his name on someday. And the district made its budget. Oh happy day. If this is the school district that this board was trying to establish, they sure didn't say so when I voted. I guess I should have paid more attention to the fine print.

I suppose MacDougal's plan of becoming a contractor and turning our vocational program into a work camp might be needed to help supplement a budget that they are not sure they can keep. It may take jobs from our community but at least he will get paid.
fefedom & redununt?
written by kd006, June 30, 2009
"informed School Teacher" darn I needed a good laugh today

smilies/grin.gif
in response to Reflective...
written by herb, July 03, 2009
The county supervisors have not recommended consolidation of school districts and neither has the County Board of Education. The proposal came from one individual and the county board agreed to study the issue to see how much money if any it might save. Those figures are not yet available. Those of us on local school boards are still waiting for those facts.
My own study determined that the total elimination of the Konocti School Board it's superintendent would save less than 70 education dollars per student while giving up all local control of the district.
In response to Cale_Page...you resort to name calling and insults while offering nothing in the way of solutions. I didn't vote for the closure of Oak Hill but I have to ask what your solution to the 2 million dollars in budget cuts might be if it were up to you.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.0035009384155 Seconds