Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Annan Jensen: Water and the need for fundamental change PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sophie Annan Jensen   
Monday, 09 March 2009
If you read only California newspapers, you might have the idea that California is unique in its current drought. It's a problem we share with areas as diverse as our Great Lakes region, southern Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Texas, the Dakotas, Hawaii, Spain, China, Argentina, the Middle East – including Iraq and Israel – and Australia,which has lost 90,000 farm jobs and millions of its lambs and dairy cows because of drought. They're also suffering huge losses from wildfires which they can't fight because there's no water; more fires are expected.


You're welcome to believe whatever you want about the causes of this worldwide problem.


  • It's global warming as explained by Al Gore.

  • It's just a natural climate cycle.

  • It's chemical spraying.

  • It's Mother Earth fighting back at overpopulation and pollution.

  • It's La Niña and it will go away soon.

  • It's the God of your choice punishing us for something you don't like.


What you believe doesn't matter. It's happening, and it doesn't look as if we're responding well. In Spain last year, Barcelona was preparing to ship water in by truck, while a golf course was being planned in an arid region near the city.


The desert city of Las Vegas is gambling it can end its 10-year drought by tapping into underground aquifers northeast of the city, environmental consequences be damned.


Patricia Mulroy, manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, says, “We've tried everything … The way you look at water has to fundamentally change.”


No kidding. (Right, it sounds like the water guy in “Chinatown,” but that was Mulwray.)


In Sacramento, Governor Arnie repeated last year's call for a voluntary 20-percent cut in water use, and he and US Sen. Dianne Feinstein are talking about more dams. The state is broke; they didn't mention what they'd use for money.


In Lake County, despite the advice of Agricultural Commissioner Steve Hajik and Farm Bureau Executive Director Chuck March that we should avoid losing any of our good agricultural land, our planning commission has approved going ahead with a final environmental impact report on a development which would do just that.


Ms. Mulroy has one thing right: “The way you look at water has to fundamentally change.”


Maybe we could start by remembering that we're in the mostly dry West, of which Mark Twain is alleged to have said “Whiskey's for drinkin' and water's for fightin'.”


Then maybe we can think about why, if water is truly a “right,” people have been moving to where the water is throughout history.


Sophie Annan Jensen is a retired journalist. She lives in Lucerne.


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)



Trackback(0)
Comments (4)Add Comment
Water just one item amog meany.
written by James, March 09, 2009
The peoples water? You bet and you will find a reason to come and take what I spent my money on. There are you that have had brainwashing for so long you believe you are entitled to the rewards of my labor. Your not! and for a government to take from us for the collective good so to distribute the hard work from one to another is a fine line. I ask you, tell me one thing this government performs well? that is other than being inept that they do well. Thee is no honest government with dishonest people,you can add water to their list of can't do. I"ve seen where we are going with the sacrificing individual rights for the sake of the aggregate. You might regret what you seek. Government maybe necessary but this much evil?
Good article Sophie, thanks
written by Donna Christopher, March 09, 2009
Have one point of contention tho, when it comes to the issus of what one believes no longer matters. I have friends that range from atheist to evangelical. The atheists are conserving water. The evangelicals frequently state that "we forget who is in charge" which is an easy out for any behavior they wish to engage in. And I am frequently stunned by the behavior they exhibit. Not very 'Christ' like in most cases.
Donna. This is not directed at you.
written by James, March 10, 2009
To those that believe there is this right to take from one to give another can only be done by government. Those of us that would do that in our world would end up as Bubbas boy friend. I am opposed to the government trying to be all things to all people and as its their nature by the fact of bureauracy it will be done poorly. Look at how large government at all levels has become and for the sake of change we get more government and that change has turned into big money now. I would say look at this system ,point to what is done well. With that knowledge your going to turn more control over to them. We see at ever turn that we can no longer keep pace with their wish list. So we will keep on spread the wealth ,removing the middle class. At this point its the government to be the winners but for how long? I can't account for "The evil men do" but to put government at the forefront as my conscience to be my God. The expression that comes to mind."Grt real"
Donna
written by bearer, March 10, 2009
What are you saying?

The religion of atheism doesn't flush toilets?

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 0.29618501663208 Seconds