|
Nowak: Clinton not a good secretary of state choice |
|
|
|
|
Written by Chris Nowak
|
|
Thursday, 15 January 2009 |
|
I want to put in my two cents on Hillary Clinton’s appointment as secretary of state. When one considers the MILLIONS of dollar flowing from international corporations and foreign governments into the Clinton bank accounts, I cannot imagine a more ethically unqualified person. When one considers her feigned gullibility during the Lewinsky sex scandal and her continuous tacit approval of her husband's documented sexual perversions as well as her outright lies about being shot at in Bosnia, I cannot think of a more morally unqualified person. When one considers her lack of administrative experience and that her only accomplishments come on the coattails of her husband's name, I cannot think of a more professionally unqualified person. In short, Hillary Clinton's lack of experience and ability is only matched by her lack of integrity and good judgment. As a nation we will pay an enormously high price for her time as secretary of state. Chris Nowak lives in Kelseyville. Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)
Trackback(0)
|
How about her wanting to go to war with Iran?
Or her setting back health care reform in this country nearly two decades with her bungled attempt at it early in her husband's first term?
Or her lackluster stint as a senator?
Or her last campaign, where she showed a complete lack of ethics and had a dysfunctional staff?
HRC was put in the sect of stae slot for one reason: to kill her political career, it was a stratigic move by BO that had little to do with the country, it was to nullify her as a competitor. The job is basicly a spokesperson, let's hope BO doesn't listen to her much since she seldom has anything intelligent to say.