Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Dr. Bonner Optometry 994-1488
Shore Line Realty www.shorelineatthelake.com
www.goldenfishbooks.com

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
County considers getting involved with Lucerne Hotel sale PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Monday, 12 January 2009

Image
The Lucerne Christian Conference Center -- also known as the Lucerne Hotel -- is up for sale and the county will discuss whether to assist the owners with the sales process or purchase the land to hold it for a developer. Courtesy photo.



LAKEPORT – The Board of Supervisors – sitting jointly as the Lake County Redevelopment Board of Directors – will consider on Tuesday whether or not to take an active part in helping the owners of the Lucerne Christian Conference Center sell the historic Lucerne Hotel or if the county should consider purchasing the building using redevelopment funds.


The meeting begins at 9 a.m. in the board chambers at the Lake County Courthouse, 255 N. Forbes. TV Channel 8 will broadcast the meeting live.


The discussion on the center is scheduled to begin at 11:15 a.m.


As Lake County News reported last month, the owners of the center and its Castlepoint Ministries announced their intention to close the building and put it on the market after demand for Christian camps and retreats in the coming year dropped off sharply.


The conference center, located at 3700 Country Club Drive, is housed in the historic Lucerne Hotel, the construction of which began in 1926.


The 75,000 square foot building has 77 guest rooms and sits on several parcels of land totaling about seven acres, according to a report to the Board of Supervisors from county Deputy Redevelopment Director Eric Seely.


The building has three main floors and seven floors in all when including its four-story tower, Seely noted. “It's one of the largest and tallest buildings in Lake County and certainly one of the most historic.”


Seely said county staffers have met with the owner's representatives to discuss “possible ways in which the Redevelopment Agency might be able to assist in locating an appropriate buyer to purchase this property.”


He added, “The future development of this property and revitalization of the hotel could have a significant beneficial impact on achievement of the Redevelopment Agency's goals and the future of the Lucerne community.”


Seely said it's important that the property's buyer has the resources needed to renovate and preserve the historic building. He suggested that, if the old hotel were operated as a motel and convention center that's open to the public, it could become a major attraction and an asset to the county's tourism and resort industry.


“There is no comparable facility in Lake County,” he stated in his report.


Last year the board approved county staff submitting a Community Development Block Grant for planning and technical assistance to determine the building's highest and best use, conduct and appraisal and perform a structural evaluation. But Seely said the building's owners at the time said they weren't interested in selling so the grant funds were redirected elsewhere.


He'll suggest to the board Tuesday that the county should proceed with that original study.


Seely's report outlines several significant concerns about the property.


For one, the owners want to sell it quickly, and the county is concerned that a buyer could acquire it who would use it “for purposes that are not in the community's best long-term interests.”


He said the owners also are considering selling off small portions of the property surrounding the hotel to cover the building's upkeep and maintenance. Seely said placing the property in multiple ownership could “decrease the likelihood that the property will ever attract the type of investor who would renovate the structure and operate it as a hotel/conference center.”


Redevelopment's plans for Lucerne, Seely explained in his report, include the development of 13th Avenue as the town's commercial center. The hotel property is 13th Avenue's backdrop, said Seely, and according to a history of the building 13th Avenue was built specifically to lead to the building.


Not only could a revitalized hotel create jobs and give a shot in the arm to local tourism, rivaling other historic destinations, it also could fulfill redevelopment's goal of having a conference center on the Lucerne Promenade, said Seely.


Seely suggests that, given the economic climate, the right buyer might take a long time in coming. For that reason, he suggests the board consider purchasing the property.


“The objective would not be to retain the property under the agency's ownership indefinitely or to actually operate it as a hotel, it would be to simply hold the property until we can find a qualified buyer who would develop it and operate it in a manner that is compatible with the agency's and community's goals,” said Seely.


Staff is therefore asking the board to consider four options:


– Provide technical assistance and support to the owners in marketing the property to potential buyers who would develop the property in a manner consistent with community's and the Redevelopment Agency's goals.


– Proceed with obtaining Community Development Block Grant authorization to use program income funding to conduct the studies originally authorized under the planning and technical assistance grant, including the use analysis, appraisal and structural evaluation.


– Pursue the purchase of vacant property fronting Country Club Drive in order to provide the current owners with funding necessary for them to be able to retain ownership for a longer period of time until an appropriate buyer is located, and to allow the agency to assume a more influential role with a new property owner on future use of the hotel facility.


– Pursue the Redevelopment Agency's purchase of the property and hold it until an appropriate buyer can be found who will renovate the structure and operate it as a hotel, conference center or mixed-use facility, consistent with the agency's goals.


Other items on Tuesday's agenda include the following.


Timed items:


9 a.m. – Animal Care and Control's presentation of adoptable animals.


9:15 a.m. – Consideration of a recommendation from the Lake County Fish and Wildlife Advisory Committee for the purchase of a custom robotic wildlife mule deer figure in the amount of $2,000 to be used by the California Department of Fish and Game to catch illegal, off-season hunters.


9:30 a.m. – Discussion and consideration of Lakebed Management Program revenue/costs and proposed ordinance establishing annual payments for lakebed encroachment permits and annual lease fees.


10 a.m. – Discussion and consideration of reducing the number of Middletown Area Plan Update Advisory Committee members from 20 to 13, and consideration of appointment to the committee.


10:30 a.m. – Discussion and consideration of a request for authorization to allow representatives of the Two by Two Lake-Yolo Watershed Committee and staff to discuss and negotiate with representatives from the Yolo County Flood and Conservation District for opportunities to secure surface water rights to Clear Lake in connection with the development and construction of the Middle Creek Restoration Project. The board also will consider a request to permit the committee representatives and necessary county staff to travel out of county to meet with the State Water Resources Control Board to discuss a pending application for surface water rights to Clear Lake in connection with the proposed Middle Creek project.


10:45 a.m. – Consideration of applications from members of the public for appointment to miscellaneous Lake County committees, commissions and advisory boards.


11 a.m. – Consideration of proposed guidelines and mini-grant application form for community-based recreational activities and request to authorize the Public Services Department director to advertise and solicit applications for this funding.


1:30 p.m. – Update on the mobile home park owners responses to the proposed rent stability lease agreement and consideration of a proposed ordinance establishing mobile home park space rent stabilization; and discussion/consideration of regulatory alternatives.


11:45 a.m. – Consideration of a proposed agreement between the county and SWCA Environmental Consultants for the preparation of an archaeological resource management report (to evaluate the potential impacts of the development of two private residences on Rattlesnake Island) in the amount of $29,602.


2:30 p.m. – Continued discussion and consideration of a request from Lowell Grant to initiate action to consolidate Lake County's seven school districts into one district and update from the county counsel and county superintendent of schools regarding the consolidation process and options for pursuing consolidation.


Untimed items:


– Update on the emergency action taken by the Lake County Board of Supervisors on Dec. 9, 2008, declaring the continuance of the existing local emergency in regards to the court order issued by the Sacramento Superior Court which prohibits fish stocking by the state Department of Fish and Game in water bodies in Lake County.


– Consideration of approval of findings of fact for the appeal of Milton and Ellen Heath of the Planning Commission's approval of Bonavita Estate (Kurt Steil and Gary Johnson) merger resubdivision to merge and resubdivide two parcels totaling 534 acres into five parcels, a deviation to construct a dead-end road longer than 1,000 feet and use permit for construction of an 11-acre ski lake at 16756 and 17350 Butts Canyon Road, Middletown.


– Consideration of out-of-state travel for programmer/analyst George Spurr to Phoenix, Ariz., from Feb. 9 through 12 to attend a workshop on control language programming.


The board also will hold a closed session for labor negotiations and to conduct a performance evaluation for the county's human resources director, Kathy Ferguson.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (1 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (20)Add Comment
boondoggling
written by dexterdog6481, January 12, 2009
Let's see, the County wants to get involved.Hmmm... All the County can come up with for the northshore is Alcohol and drug recovery centers and sprawl owned by Domini Affinito and his spawn.
Oh I forgot the artist enclave neighboring the boat launch, which no one goes to. This boondogglewill be another waste of taxpayer dollars. Who's going to manage this "hotel/motel/convention center?" :roll: Yup, Dr Bob is rarin'and ready to go.
...
written by CobbMt, January 12, 2009
Before they commit, has Mt. Konockti purchase be checked to be on track. With the economy I doubt it.
The County is full of liberal do gooderds,
what a joke.
Why don,t they look early at their budget, seems all the rest of the other Counties in the State are cutting already 5-10%, and expecting more of the same this Spring. I know it feels good to buy big ticket items, but why not a pack of Cheetos at the gas station. Oh that is now going back up too. I do not know what is better for the economy, semi-literate conservatives, of too issue oriented rather than people and labor causes liberals. When they all meet, take a look at your budget, if you are not on spot hire another Budget Groupie and hope that the drop is not as steep as the rest of California.
Oh I am thinking, what a concept.
And the 2k for the deer trap is nothing compared to the OT, wake up America! Or is this Guatemala! Think before you act. And if that agenda is your norm find some new department heads. Think on your feet, or else the economy will drive you in six months.
huh?
written by smurf, January 12, 2009
this one I don't get, why would we do an appraisal or structural report for somebody else? If we are going to buy it even for a supposedly short time ( a VERY big risk today), why don't we have a pricetag for it?
What would be a "bad" buyer?
The Konocti purchase is a whole different deal, we should be getting money from the feds for that and even if we don't the money is in our county to buy it-you can thank Kelly Cox for that, and about a million other things!
We have ONE shot at buying the mountain and protecting it from development while creating a great tourist draw and park for locals, if we blew this chance it would be as big a mistake as NOT buying the water rights to Clear lake when we had the chance back in the 70's.
Dexterdude, you know
written by Donna Christopher, January 12, 2009
not of which you speak. The county didn't go looking for Dr.Bob or Dom, they came looking to make big bucks off of redevelopment. One of the drawbacks of redevelopment is announcing the area you wish to gussy up. This allows some folks to come in, buy up crucial properties to the project and then hold the community and taxpayers hostage. That is what happened and continues to happen in Lucerne. Lucerne Harbor Park launching facility is frequently full of folks with boats and trailers that cost more that most houses here. The artist enclave you clearly know nothing about - the special Christmas activity had to be held over for an additional weekend because of demand. Just because we don't have disposable income or are looking to buy more crap to dust doesn't mean others aren't. CobbMt, if wanting a community to thrive and produce jobs and tax revenues makes you a liberal "do gooderds", while I don't know what a gooderd is -SIGN ME UP. I want this place to thrive - I want our kids to have jobs. Phil, what would be a 'bad' buyer? - try to make tomorrow's hearing. Bet I can introduce you to at least one.
A Bad Buyer
written by number1, January 12, 2009
This property would make a great Monte Carlo type casino!! Kenwood Investments from SF can (with Pelousie's help) bookmark a bill, find a few homeless Native Americans, and put the property in trust. Then the tour busses wouldn't have such a long run between Twin Pines and Robinsen and then on to Konocti Vista and Konocti Harbor -- a round the lake gaming venue. Why not?
a college, perhaps....
written by cale_page, January 12, 2009
I have always wondered, and maybe some of you know, why we don't have a decent learning facility in Lake County. I am not saying that the community colleges are doing a bad job, but a higher learning facility would do great things for our kids and our economy. Like I said, there maybe reasons we don't have a college. maybe having highly educated people in the community might be intimidating for some of our government officials. Somebody might actually figure out whats happening around here and come up with a real plan to fix it. Anyway, its just another thought.
Good thought cale_page
written by Donna Christopher, January 12, 2009
but I don't think it's large enough. And we really need a tax base in this town. I believe there was supposed to be an institute of Higher Learning out by Guenoc but I think they opted for a golf course instead. Don't know if it was a funding issue or what. Yeah, we all need to figure out what is going on around here and work to make sure whatever it is we do - DOES WORK!! Not to sure we're gonna get a 2nd chance.
...
written by yellowwing, January 12, 2009
Donna Christopher needs to get her nose out of the butts of the BOS. Believe it, the BOS are not Gods, they can and do err.

At every turn the BOS has purchased properties via redevelopment funding with no increase the property tax base. If owned by the county there is LESS property tax base.

Just don't forget the item related to purchasing vacant property to assist the owners in retaining the property longer.

The property owners need to make the best decision for themselves and the BOS needs to keep their eye on the upcoming fiscal year budget.
What would be nice...
written by kd006, January 12, 2009
Is a bit of forethought, I wonder if our BOS has approached the likes of Marriott Corporation or another like company about running and managing the place. I would like to see some plan for profit before the County just buys the land/bulding without a clue as to what they are going to do with it.

I would like to see some photos of the property, I tried the Castlepoint Ministries website but it has been taken down and once the first intro photos show up it fades to a we're sorry page about the closing with no photos of the interior or exterior.
Yellowing...
written by kd006, January 12, 2009
Not sure if it's all about property tax, at 1% it still does not add up to much, however the sales tax, room tax and economic growth to the area can't be scoffed at.

Besides if let fall into disrepair, it will certainly become an eyesore rather than a jem in the eyes of locals and visitors.
Good point kd006
written by Donna Christopher, January 12, 2009
hope you can make tomorrows hearing. I was also thinking along the lines of Time Share properties. Anything that will assure regular maintenance. And incoming taxes to the coffers. NO MORE FLEA BAG HOTELS OR FLOP HOUSES. Yellowwing, do try to keep up. No one wants the county to go into the lodging business, quit obfuscating. Unless.... is that you Dr Bob? Or Dom???
can\'t make the hearing
written by kd006, January 12, 2009
Donna,

Have a Dr. appointment at 10, but perhaps you could suggest the PEG TV folks put the video on the net for those of us who don't have cable ch 8.
Good suggestion kd -
written by Donna Christopher, January 12, 2009
be glad to! Lot's of us aren't cable TV anymore. May I share your suggestion with the BOS?
Donna
written by kd006, January 12, 2009
Please do, even if it needs to be broken up into segments. I also realize that storage space on the web is not cheap, but if made avalable for a few weeks or a month with the option to download the videos it would be informative to the public. It would also provide an option that people could go to the library and view the content.
...
written by bearer, January 12, 2009
We have a state that is 40 billion in the hole and our county wants to continue sucking more money?

At what point do we say, enough spending our money on what the BOS or any government entity feels is feel good cool of the day?

Wake up people, we are spending money that is on the credit cards addressed to generations being born now.
Well bearer, we know what
written by Donna Christopher, January 12, 2009
you don't want done - what are your suggestions for what should be done to stimulate economies? I expect to see you tomorrow at the hearing to express your concerns. Look forward to seeing the face behind the anonymous postings.
What Will They Be Thinking?
written by there_it_is, January 12, 2009
I'm afraid of what this county will do with it. An Ode to Vinyards? New housing for the chairman of the BOS? A fastrack for some county favorite? I'd rather see it turn into a museum in progress for Lake County. If there is room-a picnic ground or campground if there is room. Some counties have really pleasant (as opposed to sardine can) RV parks and camps that bring in money to support itself and then some.The key woud be to keep the bureaucracy down.
Better Question...
written by kd006, January 12, 2009
Is what does the public think, that is what counts in the grand scheme of things, and hope the BOS listens to public input.

Just for infomation a museum is usually not for profit, and we already have a few in the county, Lakeport, Lower Lake and soon the Stage Stop when ever that is restored.
Geesh, here we go again
written by Donna Christopher, January 12, 2009
A vineyard - not zoned ag and in the middle of a residential area. Supervisor Rushing in a mansion?? - you've obviously never met her (aside from the illegality of such a notion). Picnic grounds or campground - for crying out loud, are you familiar with the Northshore at all - plenty of those already. The county has no interest in holding on to the property - the concern here (and it is a very legitimate one - I'll gladly give you a tour of who owns what and how they have misused it to the detriment of this town) is it being turned into another fleabag flophouse. I see a pattern here, keep Lucerne looking like crap so a)you can feel better about where you live and b)it remains a great dumping ground for felons & pervs. Why the fear that something good may come of this and people get jobs or have the opportunity to start a business and the county gets the tax revenues? THE COUNTY HAS NO INTEREST IN RUNNING/OWNING A LODGING FACILITY, they are looking at the question of what is the best way to proceed (and whether to do anything at all) so that this property gets the highest, best use out of it and to avoid it be snagged up and allowed to deteriorate. You know, if this all works out in the future y'all gonna need to find a new town to dump on (and in).
...
written by Suzybear46, January 14, 2009
I agree with you 100%, I work for the county and our contract is being held up due to possible cuts, the county should not get involved until they know what their real budget is :?:

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 18 March 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

TwinPine Casino & Hotel Wine Country's Favorite Playground
Sutter Lakeside Hospital
 

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.3233389854431 Seconds