Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Officials investigate woman for keeping wildlife PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Sunday, 28 December 2008
LAKEPORT – A woman who surrendered dozens of dogs to Lake County Animal Care and Control earlier this month also is being investigated for keeping a wild animal on her property.


The woman, whose name has not been released by local officials, surrendered 70 small breed dogs to county officials after a complaint was made about the animals on Dec. 16, as Lake County News has reported.


Also found on her property at the time was a raccoon, which Animal Care and Control said was turned over to state Fish and Game officials.


Game Warden Loren Freeman told Lake County News that he was investigating the case.


He said Animal Care and Control notified him that they had found the raccoon. "I advised them to seize it."


Under California law it's a crime to possess certain wild animals, including raccoons, Freeman explained.


One concern about raccoons is that they carry rabies but have subdued symptoms when suffering from the disease, he said.


Freeman said keeping wildlife like raccoons is a misdemeanor; convictions can result in up to $2,000 in fines and six months in jail, "but it's typically not nearly that high."


He said he sees one or two cases a year of local people keeping wild animals as pets. "We do have quite a problem" when it comes to keeping wildlife, he added.


"Raccoons, opossums, squirrels – people seem to take them when they're cute and cuddly," said Freeman.


People usually take the animals when they're babies and hand-raise them. "They don't really domesticate," said Freeman.


Freeman said there also is a big problem with people attempting to keep deer as pets.


Deer get food aggressive as they get older, and then people try to release them back into the wild. Freeman said there have been numerous cases where the animals have to be destroyed for public safety reasons.


When people are found with wildlife, Freeman said Fish and Game has several options on what to do with the animals.


First, they can return the animal to where the people got it, putting it back out into the wild.


Second, they can ship it out of state. This works in cases where people have brought animals like alligators from another area. It also works with such animals as ferrets, which are legal to keep as pets in other states but aren't legal in California.


The third choice, said Freeman, is to destroy the animal.


That, unfortunately, appears to be the option for the raccoon in this case.


"I looked at rehabilitating this one and it's not an option," he said, adding that the local wildlife rehabilitation program at Spirit Wild on Cobb is unwilling to take the animal.


The raccoon also has issues because it's been exposed to humans and to dozens of dogs, he said. Trying to release it into the wild likely would not be a success.


"The only choice is to destroy the animal to protect the rest of our population," he said.


Freeman said the investigation could lead to a formal complaint process and prosecution through the District Attorney's Office.


Freeman said it's unfortunate when animals are taken from the wild and then have to be destroyed due to safety reasons.


Taking the animals from their homes in the wild, he added, ultimately is "the wrong thing."


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (12)Add Comment
Lucky for that
written by Donna Christopher, December 28, 2008
raccoon that they can save it by killing it. :shock: I know F&G have a hard job but it's very sad to see this is the only solution, especially when you factor in the urban/wildlife interface that occurs in many communities in Lake County. There is a steady flow of racs, skunks and possums around here - folks, keep your gardens gleaned and pet food inside PLEASE! And sign up for garbage service if you don't already have it.
Huh?
written by smurf, December 28, 2008
this gal has 70 dogs she's raised in her puppy mill that supposedly are worth lots of money, but turns them over to AC, then it turns out that she is also keeping a racoon?
None of this makes sense, and the stuff about her name being withheld by AC is crap, she is a BIG drain on AC (meaning us) and she has broken the law, which will result in the racoon being put down-she has no right to have her identity protected.
...
written by Magnum, December 28, 2008
Who cares what her name is, what are you going to do Tar and Feather her?
we have a right...
written by smurf, December 28, 2008
to know if our neighbors are criminals, this woman clearly is and an animal is going to die and we will have to pay LOTS of money because of it, it's public business and therefore we have a right to this information.
Phil, that critter would
written by Donna Christopher, December 28, 2008
be just as dead if it had been 'raiding' her trash and county trapper came and got it. The animals I saw on Lakeco & the text of the articles does not imply that most (if any) of her actions are 'criminal'. Not all poor judgment a crime makes. Do the math, if all the animals - WHO WERE VOLUNTARILY SURRENDED - get adopted out maybe it will be a financial wash but if all the critters (minus one poor rac) get good, loving homes then I am happy with how the tax dollars were spent, if indeed it isn't a financial wash.
we have a right!??? And so doe
written by ICU2, December 28, 2008
Innocent until proven guilty (remember). Her tax dollars working also for her, and she can have mine. I say "Thank You” for caring enough to feed and try. Thank you for caring about God’s creatures. They may not have survived in this cruel world where so many don't care about anything but the almighty Dollar. We don't know why she had the raccoon it could have been injured and grew to love her and she it. It can be hard to comprehend when money is your master. 70 dogs my hat is off to her, the food consumption must have gnawed a hole in her monthly budget, or maybe she was illegally collecting funds from the DWD (Doggie Welfare Department). I say thank you, who ever you are for giving a hoot (oops that’s an owl). I’m Sorry n sadden for your lost and may good bless you for your efforts ...how does that saying go??? No good deed goes unpunished!
Or this one;
Ignorance of the law is no excuse (you should have known better then to care.)

Definition
Legal Right: noun, a right based in law

So if her name is withheld until justice for all is served and she is charged with a crime(s) what law was broken? Take your time I'll wait!!!???!! :roll:
save rocky racoon
written by dogwalker, December 28, 2008
why do they have to kill the poor critter? That seems very dumb. Find an animal behaviorist and see what they think....go the extra mile for the poor creature.
Puppy Mill Woman
written by icare4dogs, December 28, 2008
I fostered one of the dogs this horrible woman was keeping. This precious being was ill-nourished (so much for the money spent on food), obviously had NO veterinary care, was not spayed. She had an enlarged heart, shadows on her lungs which may have been pneumonia or some fungal infection, her ears were infected with two different strains of bacteria, her eyes were so scarred from lack of treatment from a genetic condition that she was functionally blind and painful. She had no hair on her tail, around her eyes or on others parts of her body from flea infestation. She was the saddest little creature I have ever seen. My husband and I fell in love with her immediately and did everything we could to save her life. We saw that she received veterinary care (through a breed rescue trust organization), had a warm bed and a lot of love. She was euthanized last night, and our hearts are broken, but she is finally pain free and at peace. Yes, ICU2, laws were broken. This is animal abuse. She should never have been allowed to keep 4 dogs. Her name should be printed for all the world to see. I can only hope she lives long enough to suffer as she made these beautiful creatures suffer.
Following the story
written by elarson, December 29, 2008
Thanks for the update -- I'm sorry to hear one of the little dogs didn't make it. They touched my heart when I visited them. As the kennel tech pointed out, despite what happens to them, they still manage to wag their tails and offer a kiss.

As soon as we have more info on the case and can get names in connection with the situation, we'll follow it up. The fact that some of the dogs appear to have serious health problems will likely be a mitigating factor.
Thanks for additional
written by Donna Christopher, December 29, 2008
info icare4dogs and a big thank you for trying to save that dog. I am sorry for your loss. This is now a horse of a different color - a dog in that condition has been at the very least neglected, at worse abused. Either is not acceptable. Thanks for keeping an eye on this Elizabeth and keeping us informed. Time to go hug the critters - soul salve.
Yes! Save Rocky
written by ICU2, December 29, 2008
God bless you ICARE4DOGS and all like you, for your efforts to care for Gods tiny creatures. You obviously have more information on this then the article explains. The article stated that the woman had 70 small breed dogs and now you say it was a puppy mill. I think I missed something. Was she raising them to sell or caring for them or what? Article didn’t say, I’d like to know more on how, what, why and when then who. Either way the cost for care for this many animals would be exorbitant. Was she a horrible woman or someone caring beyond her physical and financial abilities? Was her heart in the right place or was she holding dogfights, breeding, selling and keeping the money and not caring for the animals? Or did she try to give homes to too many putting herself in jeopardy?
The cost for care of this many dogs from my estimation would be expensive using the lowest example of cost for food (not using bulk dry measurements for this example).
1 can per dog cheap brand=$00.80 approximately
70 dogs once a day equals $56.00 per day
7days X $56.00 equals $392 per week
4 weeks X $ 392 equals $1568 per month food only for the dogs.
Vet visit for 70 dogs one time @ 50.00 approximate base cost without meds or special needs 70X50=3,500.00 total out of pocket cost would be $5068 at some time she would have to have had to spend. Is she a horrible person or a person living beyond her means? Did she know or give though to the cost? Does she make or earn enough? If she was trying to care for them on an insufficient income then is she really a horrible person or someone unaware of her own limits.
Many are very easy to judge with out knowing the whole story. I still believe in innocent until proven guilty. I still believe in people who care before concern of self. I believe in giving a person a chance to see what the motive was in her ignorance that led to her being arrested for abuse. Was it an abuse or just pain ignorance and poverty?
And I still say name with held until the facts are known is abiding by the rights we all have of innocent until proven guilty. Its very hard to retract an oops thought you were guilty, damage done. It’s how any of us would and should be treated

Oh by the way anyone have the stats on the number of strays and so called family pets dumped on the side of the roads, because the families can no longer financially care for them? These are the ones deserving public ridicule.
Puppy Mill Woman
written by icare4dogs, January 12, 2009
The Press Democrat article stated this was a former breeding operation; i.e., puppy mill. None of the dogs were spayed or neutered. Perhaps she is ignorant and/or has limited funds, and perhaps she would say she cared for these dogs (as in emotionally cared); however, that is no excuse for the neglect of 70 dogs. And, she surely does not live totally isolated from civilization; someone must of known of this neglect. She, or others with knowledge, had a fundamental responsibility to take action to see that the care needed was provided. If that meant finding homes for each of them where they would be cared for, then that step should have been taken. If you could see these dogs you would understand why noone with an ounce of intelligence could possibly not see that they needed help. I do not believe that they were physically abused, as in their having been hit, as most of the ones I've seen have a sweet temperament, but they were neglected to the point of abuse. Yes, I agree, innocent until proven guilty; however, I have seen the proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This person should not have the privilege of having any dogs at all. I am not a young woman, and know that I will soon reach an age when I can no longer have pets in my home because I will either outlive them or will not be able physically or financially care for them. At that time, I will rely on friends to share their companions with me. I now have a second dog from this group, she is old and has an enlarged heart and spinal degeneration. We are working with veterinarians to deal with her ear infection, teeth abscesses, severe eye condition and bronchial infection. However, this one looks like she'll make it . . . we will certainly do everything within our power to make it so. The thanks go to our own dogs whose love make it impossible not to help others!

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 0.94368195533752 Seconds