Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Wiggins: Going green – good for the environment, economy PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sen. Patricia Wiggins   
Friday, 26 December 2008
California is experiencing its worst budget crisis in memory, if not in the history of the state, and Democrats in the capitol are working to find a solution – a permanent one. That means spending cuts and revenue increases.


But earlier this month, legislative Republicans released a set of demands they said would have to be met before they’d even discuss raising revenue – hardly an appropriate way to negotiate a budget.


One of their demands, in particular, stood out to me: That California delay implementation of our ground-breaking global warming law, AB 32, which was signed into law by Gov. Schwarzenegger in 2006.


Seeing as how only one Republican voted for AB 32 as it passed through the legislature, it’s no shock that they’re now trying to delay this first-in-the-nation law. What is sad, however, is how out of touch their thinking is.


California has led the country in pursuing new laws to address climate change and needs to lead the country in developing a 21st century economy. While my Republican colleagues insist that implementation of AB 32 will hurt the economy, several companies are busy proving them otherwise by looking and moving forward.


With the imminent passage of a federal climate change law, numerous large businesses are working to mitigate global climate change by reducing their own emissions and impacts, while at the same time growing their companies.


For example, the multi-national chemical giant Dupont has reduced its greenhouse gas emissions 72 percent below 1990 levels – not only better for the planet, it’s also helped the company save over $3 billion.


In 2005, General Electric, the third largest company in the world, revealed its new business strategy: “ecomagination.” The plan was, and is, to develop and sell clean technologies that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduce environmental impacts.


It’s not all about corporate social responsibility for the 128-year-old company, though.


When GE’s chief executive officer says “Green is green,” he’s also referring to the color of money. Profits from the “ecomagination” products have increased from $10 billion in 2005 to $18 billion in 2008.


Even Wal-Mart is on board, promoting compact fluorescent light bulbs, requiring suppliers to reduce packaging, and installing solar panels on the roofs of some its stores. Again, this may appear to be a marketing strategy, but in the end, it improves the bottom line while reducing emissions – good for the economy and good for the environment.


In the past month, we watched as the three major American car companies appeared before Congress requesting a bailout at the expense of the taxpayers. I do not wish to see the automakers fail, per se, in part because of the devastating impact that their collapse would have on countless working families as well as the overall economy.


Nor should we believe the rhetorical tirades of Congressional Republicans who have tried to pin much of the blame on the workers and their labor unions.


It’s important to recognize that the primary reason that the Big Three slid towards financial failure because they lacked the foresight to innovate and to lead the way toward development of new technologies that could have improved their products and improved their bottom line. As their competitors moved forward, they remained stagnant.


California has always led in environmental protection, and we are well positioned to lead the way for the new green economy.


We need to look forward, not back. And we must continue to embrace strong environmental laws that protect our health and safety while encouraging businesses to innovate and improve efficiencies.


Congressional Representative Hilda Solis (D-El Monte), author of the 2007 federal Green Jobs Act and President-elect Barack Obama’s choice to become the next U.S. Secretary of Labor, estimates that green-job training could create as many as three million new jobs in the next decade.


I encourage my Republican colleagues to consider the possibilities – and to embrace changes that can be a win-win-win for businesses, the economy and the planet.


Patricia Wiggins represents California’s Second Senate District, which includes Lake County.


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (2)Add Comment
Foolish
written by purplegirl, December 26, 2008
I think it is foolish, really, to take any green promise from our governor to heart. You have to remember, this is the same man who helped put the Hummer in the hands of civilians. Oh, sure, he goes around with great pride showing off that his personal Hummer has been converted to use biofuel but if you think that adds up to environmental responsibility then I have a bridge to sell you made of gold. Most of our politicians, if you really get to the root of which most of their motivations stem from, are jumping on the green bandwagon in order to "carbon tax" the tar out of the little guy to make more room (once again) for big business. And, it isn't just the Republicans. Even Gore, who seems to be the poster child for "green" these days, has been a hypocrit living in a very shady area of green for awhile now. According to the The Tennessee Center for Policy Research, using public records, calculated the Gores' energy use at about 18,414 kilowatt-hours (KWH) of power a month in 2006 (the same year his infamous "An Inconvenient Truth" film debuted) which, according to the same source, was 14 percent more the 16,200 monthly KWH used in 2005. Sounds like an inconvenient truth, to me. Especially when you compare the national average for 2006 was only 10,656 KWH FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR AS OPPOSED TO A MONTH. I am all for living greener and making personal greener choices both in the home and elsewhere but I really think people need to wake up to the reality that most politicians (and people, for that matter) are not going green for the sake of the planet as much as they are going green for the sake of trendiness and lining their pockets with an entirely different kind of green.
There\'s nothing wrong
written by Donna Christopher, December 26, 2008
with going green in order to make the other green - it's the only carrot & stick we've got right now. Doing what's right for the sake of it being the right thing to do is a luxury for better financial times, no shame in saving money and saving our only home in the same fell swoop. Alternate energy sourcing is the financially astute thing to do. Anything that reduces our dependence on foreign oil from folks who then use our own dollars against us is a good thing. Anything that reduces our carbon output is a good thing. New and creative thinking will produce jobs. I am skeptical we're gonna get much new thinking out of these same old tired politicos tho. And has anyone else noticed that it is the Southern Republican Senators that are so against northern Union labor - the Civil War redux? Wall Street produces Toxic Debt and gets gobs of cash with no strings attached and bonus/retreats/private jets intact. America needs a new business model.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 0.82960295677185 Seconds