Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Community members speak on HVLA lockout; association responds to union PDF Print E-mail
Written by Aimee Gonsalves   
Monday, 24 November 2008
HIDDEN VALLEY LAKE – The Hidden Valley Lake Association Board meeting on Nov. 20 drew residents from around the community concerned about the recent lockout of association workers affiliated with a union. {sidebar id=108}


There was a mixed point of view as far as what should be done concerning the lockout of union workers, which began last weekend, as Lake County News has reported.


HVLA workers at the meeting who are affiliated with Laborers International Union of North America Local 139 stated that the lockout occurred after a scheduled meeting between the two sides was canceled due to the union representative being sick.


Lawyers for the union workers contacted HVLA to inform them of the representative's illness but the association reportedly sent someone to the negotiation meeting any way. The lockout occurred shortly afterward, according to union workers.


In a press release given to community members late last week, HVLA General Manager Jim Johnson said the association locked out the union personnel “because of financial concerns regarding the ongoing union contract negotiations.”


Johnson stated in the press release, “These concerns are based on the $644,644 loss the golf course experienced in 2007 and the loss of $424,325 through September of this year.”


The statement said the lockout will end and employees will be allowed to report back to work as soon as HVLA management and the union can reach an agreement regarding salaries, cost of living increases and benefit payment allocation.


On Thursday evening, the HVLA board heard from many people on the subject, some siding with Hidden Valley Lake, but most came to speak on behalf of the union workers.


Hal Muskat, who has lived in Hidden Valley Lake for 12 years, described what is happening as “horrible.”


Muskat said that the work done by the union personnel is what justifies homeowners in Hidden Valley Lake paying their association dues.


He suggested that residents withhold their association dues from HVLA and instead put their money into an escrow account. This way, Muskat said, people are still paying, but the association can't get its hands on the money until the union workers are put back to work.


Another resident suggested that the golf course be boycotted until union workers were able to do their jobs again.


The board also heard from an emotional Lora Darling, wife of one of the golf course maintenance workers who is currently part of the lockout.


The Darling family will not be able to have Thanksgiving this year and with Christmas just around the corner they fear that the holiday will be ruined for their family as well, she said.


Darling pleaded with the board to put unionized employees back to work as this lockout is really hurting her friends, neighbors and family.


HVLA has offered union workers their vacation pay now to try to help with the financial hardship of the lockout, but many workers didn't agree with this offer, as they said they work hard for their vacations and didn't to use them that way.


After the open session time was ended by HVLA Board President Don Dornbush, most of the union workers left all at once. “You guys are a disgrace!” were their parting words to board officials.


On Nov. 19, HVLA released a list of comments relating to union negotiations.


Among other things, the association stated that, as of Oct. 31, union personnel were paid about $77,600 a year more than the union contract requires. Officials also maintain that they have not requested or suggested that the hourly rate of any union member be reduced.


The association stated that HVLA management suggested to the union that they be allowed to consider full-time employment as 32 hours per week – which is the same as all other HVLA employees – as opposed to the current guaranteed 40 hours per week. The reason, according to HVLA, was that reducing the hours was an alternative to laying off personnel. They said the union did not agree with the recommendation.


HVLA management said it has proposed a 4-percent pay increase effective Nov. 1 and a 3-percent increase effective for each of the other two years of the contract, which is consistent with what the rest of the staff will receive.


The union has reportedly requested that HVLA pay the entire benefit packet of over $6 per hour worked for each employee, which the association says will amount to about $163,000 for union employees. This is in addition to their hourly rate of pay, and could equate to $12,480 per employee per year.


Responding to comments Local 139 business manager Dave George made to Lake County News last week, HVLA said that both sides – not just the association – have introduced lawyers into the negotiations process this year.


HVLA officials also stated that the association has not refused to advise the union as to the salary of each union employee, as George had stated. The association said it provided more than 2,000 pages of documents that Local 139 had requested; when the union again requested salary information, it was provided on Nov. 3.


The lowest salary being paid for any union person is $11.60 per hour, according to HVLA, which it said exceeds the required union contract rate of $9.56 per hour.


“In fact, all union personnel are paid more than the required union contract rate,” the association stated. “The average pay for all union personnel is 20 percent above the required union contract hourly rate. The rate of pay for union personnel currently ranges from $11.60 to $21.20 per hour.”


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (4)Add Comment
Apples vs. oranges
written by bobmalley, November 24, 2008
Both parties need to speak in an oranges vs. oranges context! The association offers 4,3, and 3% over the next three years. That in itself seems to be a great offer given the current economic climate. The union wants $6 per hour worked for each employee, this on it's face seems excessive since the employee makes a minimum of .60 an hour that would be an increase of just under 50%! How close are they really, and what are the real concerns of the employee and employer? The golf course and property must be able to break even and cannot afford to run like a governmental agency. They must be financially solvent in order to survive. If that means less employees or less work hours then the budget must be the compass. The workers need a union that looks out for thier concerns and protects them but not one that trys to bully the employer into submission. This story goes deep into where the country has found itself, in the middle of a mess that calls for clear thinking and good judgement on both sides.
The employees need to decide just how much they really need to survive and how important it is to have a job in these tough economic times. The association needs to decide what kind of facilities it is willing to underwrite. Sounds simple but requires tough decisions.
Apples vs. Oranges
written by lo36912, November 25, 2008
Are you at the negotation table, how do you know what the Union or HVLA wants. The Union only wants the workers to go back to work while the negotations are under way. HVLA started this ugly mess by locking the employees out. Additionally if HVLA is all about saving money why on earth are they paying the new GM a 6 figure income and security, office workers and Union members are all having hours and wages cut?
Reason for a contract....
written by Employee, November 30, 2008
Do you really know what a union contract is?......

There is a reason a CONTRACT is called that....it means that if you want to continue working...get the contract finished and agreed with...other wise...L-O-C-K-O-U-T....yep..that spells it out for ya!!!!
Not too smart ...
written by What about Humanity?, December 06, 2008
Being that the National Labor Relations Board notified the HVLA Board that the lock out is illegal and that they must return the employees to work, I would guess you don't know much about labor laws. Don't feel bad, neither does the HVLA Attorney or the GM.

And then in the best interest of the HVLA, they demanded a court ordered judgment before they would make the employees whole in wages and benefits for the time they were locked out. So, even though they know they MUST pay them, and they were given the opportunity to fix it wihout a leagl smear on their record, they refused and demanded a judgement against them. How smart is that?

Homeowners, how does that make you feel? Are they taking care of you? If you think NOT, find that petition that is circulating and sign it. And do a little bit more by taking a page and getting it filled out by other homeowners. Come on - we all need this. We all need to make this happen.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Monday, 24 November 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.004870891571 Seconds