The Lodge at Blue Lakes 707.275.2181





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Shore Line Realty www.shorelineatthelake.com
www.goldenfishbooks.com
Dr. Bonner Optometry 994-1488

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Hughes sentenced to state prison; appeal expected PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Monday, 08 September 2008
THIS STORY HAS BEEN UPDATED.


LAKEPORT – A San Francisco man is facing more than four years in state prison after being sentenced for a burglary and assault with a firearm in a 2005 incident in Clearlake Park.


Renato Hughes Jr., 24, was sentenced Monday afternoon by Judge Arthur Mann.


He was convicted last month of burglary and assault with a firearm; at the same time, he was acquitted of two homicide counts he faced under the provocative act, and robbery and attempted murder charges, as Lake County News has reported. A charge of causing great bodily injury resulted in a hung jury.


The prosecution alleged that Hughes and two friends, Christian Foster and Rashad Williams, had broken into the Clearlake Park home of Shannon Edmonds and Lori Tyler in the early morning hours of Dec. 7, 2005, planning to steal Edmonds' medical marijuana.


Tyler's son, Dale Lafferty, then 17, was assaulted with a baseball bat and left with permanent brain injuries.


Mann said that, because of the violence of the burglary, he was sentencing Hughes to the upper term of six years in prison with a one-year enhancement for the burglary, plus another year for the assault charge, which was a mid-term sentence for that crime


In all Hughes received an eight-year prison sentence, according to Mann. With time served and a 15-percent time credit, he should face just over four years in state prison.


Following the hearing, which lasted more than an hour, Hughes' attorneys, Stuart Hanlon and Sara Rief, said they expected Hughes to appeal the conviction and sentence.


Hughes' case has generated significant attention in the nearly three years it's been under way, in part because he was being tried for two homicides he didn't commit.


Edmonds shot Foster and Williams as they ran from his home but has never been charged. Hughes was charged with the murder under the provocative act doctrine, which held him responsible for the deaths because he was alleged to have taken part in a crime with a possible lethal result.


Hanlon had argued that Edmonds was a drug dealer and had killed the men in a drug deal gone wrong.


In making the sentencing decision, Mann considered a 22-page probation report, victim impact statements by Tyler and Lafferty's grandmother, Deborah Besley, and arguments by Hanlon and District Attorney Jon Hopkins.


Reading her statement before the court, Tyler thanked Hopkins for “bringing out the truth” of the case.


She said she didn't have feelings of hatred for Hughes but believed that, if one of the men involved had spoken up, the incident that led to her son's near-fatal beating and the deaths of Foster and Williams could have been avoided.


"Dale was a wonderful young man with a great future and everything going for him," she said.


Today, he has to have 24-hour daycare after suffering eight skull fractures during the incident. Tyler said he had to have surgery to remove part of his brain in order to survive.


"The counselor told me that I have lost my son," she said, adding when she took him home after his hospitalization, it was like bringing home a 170-pound infant.


She and Edmonds are no longer together, and she said she has trouble sleeping at night, sometimes getting up to check the doors and windows.


"You never dream that anything this horrible cold ever happen to you," said Tyler, asking Mann for the strictest sentence.


Reading her statement, Besley said Hughes, Williams and Foster made the decision to take away her grandson's future.


"This is not a crime of race, this is a crime of burglary and assault," she said.


She asked Hughes, "Renato, do you have any idea what you have done to Dale and his family?" Hughes looked up at her from the defense table as she asked the question.


Besley said it costs $48,000 a month to care for Lafferty at a special care home more than 400 miles away.


She, too, asked the court for the maximum sentence. "Why should you get all the opportunities that Dale will never get?" she said to Hughes.


As Besley was speaking, Hughes' sister, sitting in the audience, said, "He didn't do anything," which she repeated as Besley turned to return to her seat.


Hopkins relayed to the court a brief statement from Edmonds, who said he whole life was ruined as a result of the incident, adding it has impacted his 11-year-old daughter.


Edmonds was not present at the sentencing. On Saturday, he was arrested by Clearlake Police on a drunk and disorderly charge, but has since been released from jail, according to jail records.


The families of Foster and Williams are suing Edmonds and Tyler in federal court, a case expected to come to trial next year, as Lake County News has reported.


Prosecution, defense debate sentencing


Hughes himself took the chance to speak to the judge during the hearing, appealing to Mann's sense of fairness.


“I stand by my innocence in this whole ordeal,” said Hughes, who noted he has been incarcerated for 33 months.


If he could give Lafferty back his life and bring back Foster and Williams, Hughes said he would.


He said he looks forwarding to having positive opportunities once he's released, including going to college and becoming “a productive and contributing member of society.”


He said he wouldn't continue to be degraded and humiliated by the accusations against him. “Only God can judge me.”


Hughes said he looks forward to being home with his young daughter.

 

Hanlon told Mann that he had objections to the probation report, and he also faulted Hopkins for statements he's made about the jury verdict in the media.


He said the fact that Hughes was acquitted of most of the charges keeps getting lost. “Those acquittals define the facts.”


Hanlon said the jury found that Hughes was not responsible for Lafferty's injuries, and asked that the entire probation report be stricken due to its lack of impartiality.


Hopkins asserted that the facts of the case still remain, and then discussed previous convictions on Hughes' record. When the 2005 incident happened, Hughes was on probation for driving under the influence, said Hopkins. Hughes also has a conviction for having marijuana for sale.

 

The probation officer who prepared the report for the sentencing interviewed Hughes, whose statements differ from those he made on the witness stand during the trial, said Hopkins. The report, he said, quoted Hughes as saying the police planted his blood in Edmonds' house to link him to the scene, “which is patently ridiculous,” said Hopkins.


As Hopkins began to recount testimony Hughes gave in court, Hanlon said he objected to an attempt to retry the case. Mann overruled the objection.


Mann said he didn't consider Hughes' prior record significant. However, Williams and Foster inflicted significant injury during the incident, which Mann said demonstrated planning and professionalism.

 

Hopkins asserted that the burglary was particularly brutal. “Someone had a shotgun, someone had a hammer, and a melee broke out.”


Hanlon responded that Hughes' level of involvement, which was “some sort of aid and abet” and not the murders or use of the bat, called for no more than a midterm sentence with no enhancements, for a total of four years.


Mann said he gave no weight to the two homicides because the jury found Hughes not guilty and Edmonds was “integrally involved.”


“I do find that there was great violence in this burglary,” said Mann, which led him to conclude it merited the upper term.


After handing Hughes the sentence, Mann explained his right to appeal. The appeal must be filed with the Superior Court within 60 days.


He asked Hughes if he had any questions about the sentence. Hughes only responded, “At least I'm not getting life” which is what he would have faced had he been convicted of the homicide charges.


Hopkins informed the court that he would not seek to retry Hughes on the single charge of assault causing great bodily injury, which had resulted in a hung jury.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (26)Add Comment
lock him up
written by Nancy726, September 08, 2008
and throw away they key, we don't need drug thieves like this in our community
...
written by Magnum, September 08, 2008
I still don't get it...If he is guilty of the burglary and assault than how is he not guilty of Murder. That is what the law reads right? If someone is killed while you are committing felony then you are guilty of Murder.hmmmmmmm. I hope he gets what he deserves in prison.
...
written by BobbieLynne, September 08, 2008
..........about our justice system?
Renato Hughes sentenced
written by Sunshine, September 08, 2008
and all he could say is "at least I'm not doing life" when the judge asked of he had anything to say.
Miserable show
written by Beachcomber, September 08, 2008
this case generated the worst publicity for Lake County imaginable, the painful tragic details of the case are a foul exercise and debasement of wasted lives

easily preventable by "just saying NO!"
Got off easy
written by Beachcomber, September 08, 2008
Based on Judge Mann's sentencing limitations the result was no more or less than any other person in Hughes posistion would have recieved. Judge Mann is principled and fair from the bench. I have won some and lost some in his court but never felt the result was a product of prejudice or public sentiment. He may wear the black robe but for my $$ is a fair, well meaning sensible Judge that treats all in his court with respect even those who really do not deserve it. I hope Hughes gets his act togerther admits his dumb ass dope addled mistakes and makes his life positive after prison. Above all he should accept responsibility for f'n up and atone for the sadness the whole incident has visited on his victims, dead friends and family. Hanlon did a hell of a job for a white devil so pleeeze don't bring race into this discussion. Likewise Edmonds is a mutt but if he can live with shooting a man in the back he will regret it as he ages and looks toward his own mortality. Kids..thug life is no life no matter if you be the shooter or the shootee
I guess
written by Raphael, September 08, 2008
it is better to have people BUY drugs than steal them from "respectable" drug dealers like Edmonds? Yeah right!!
you are wrong
written by DDean, September 08, 2008
I hope he can still own a gun, it is a proven theft deterrent. People will think twice about breaking into his home and beating his family again. These people deserve everything that happened to them. If you are ever put in a situation of defending yourself or family members, what are you going to do? In fact every house in California should have a gun. As well has making this a "will issue" state. How many criminals would commit crimes knowing their PREY are able to defend themselves. God bless this man and his family! Because they are the victims here. Don't forget that.
Second amendment
written by DDean, September 08, 2008
What this man did(Edmonds) was a cowardly act.He gives a bad name to all gun owners.Law abiding gun owners,all would agree.What Edmonds did, to me does not seem law abiding.Our justice system is so strange.Raphael,you dont have to be a redneck to own a gun.Sounds like your calling all rednecks stupid.Im not a redneck,but i have guns.
You are wrong
written by DDean, September 08, 2008
is not my blog.I do believe in protecting your family,but shooting a man in the back.Coward.
I would do the same
written by gmack_1978, September 08, 2008
Put yourself in Edmonds shoes, 3 men have just broke into your home and have beaten your son unconscious, would you let them run off, knowing that they would get away, or come back later and finish you off. I don't think so. To many people have become compliant and turned into sheep. This man was protecting his family, no matter where he shot them.
Apparently
written by Raphael, September 09, 2008
not only can Edmonds live with shooting 2 men in the back, one of whom was running away and the other was lying on the ground with 4 bullets in him already (are these facts correct?), but he can walk free, thanks to a warped local justice system, although he is a low life drug dealer and a coward (only a coward shoots anyone in the back, that's a fact...)
Can Edmonds still legally own a gun?...I wouldn't be surprised. May be he should graduate to being given a permit to own and operate a fully automatic weapon...and be given a medal by the NRA...I know many local rednecks would approve.
This man
written by Raphael, September 09, 2008
was not protecting his family, he was avenging his family...
This is not Iraq or Afghanistan...you don't shoot fugitives in the back because you think they might get away or come back. And you don't seek revenge with a gun.
If you want to return to the wild west, create the laws that make wild west behavior legal. Then wear a bullet proof vest and keep your head down.
In the meantime, abide by the law and let the police apprehend a fugitive and a wounded man.
Okay
written by Raphael, September 09, 2008
I did not mean to imply all people who have guns are rednecks or ignorant...that would be unfair and inaccurate...the majority are responsible citizens.
And even thought I would never want to own a gun, I believe in normal self defense, that is a fundamental, "god-given" right.
Edmonds is neither responsible nor was he exercising self-defense...his shooting had to be out of rage and for immediate revenge. That's not legal, although it can be considered human.
Good idea
written by Raphael, September 09, 2008
let's everybody who uses or sells drugs keep guns to protect their stash...like in the deep woods or in South Central LA. Then we can have more shootouts, since even illegal drugs are apparently considered "private property" by the law in this particular and peculiar case, setting a precedent...
He is
written by Raphael, September 09, 2008
not guilty of murder because he didn't shoot his accomplices in the back while they were running away...although the provocative act doctrine states that he could have been found guilty of murder, it is an absurd law and common sense prevailed.
Meanwhile, Edmonds, who used unnecessary force, walks free, and the next individual who feels like pursuing and shooting a fugitive in the back outside of his own property while feeling "reasonably" threatened (explain this one!!!) should be free to do so, even execution and vigilante style, to the approval and cheers of the community.
Welcome back to the wild west.
Next, we will have judge Roy Bean, a rope and "swift justice" for those who escape being shot by the "good citizens". That should attract a lot of tourists...no need for frontier days re-enactment, we can have the real thing!!
The real tragedy in all of this is Dale Lafferty, but here where it really counts the facts are murky.
smurf says:
written by smurf, September 09, 2008
hopefully Hughes will come out of prision and get his life back on track, he got a heck of a break and should make the best of it. Hopkins should be removed from office, for this case and a slew of others he's mishandled.
It seems likely that Edmonds WAS selling pot, so he probably brought this on himself and his family, which was a pretty squrrilly bunch even before this happened. I'm just sorry for his kid, who was the big loser in this, followed by the taxpayers. The two dead guys played the game and took their chances, that's what happens when you try knocking-over drug dealers yourself.
...
written by Sunshine, September 09, 2008
He could not have received a fair sentence or trial here. That is just the way I feel. I still feel strongly that Edmonds should have some resonsibility in all of this, I mean shooting them in the back, one as he lay twitching on the ground, and he walks away with no charges. This whole thing reminds me of the movie Deliverance
He is___
written by fastleft, September 09, 2008
A THUG plain and simple, These guys beat someone with a baseball bat! do you get that. I can care less if Edmonds was selling pot. These guys drove to his house, broke in and beat his kid, why is it so hard for you to feel the rage Edmonds must have felt. So Rapheal lets say someone for whatever reason BEAT your kid with a BASEBALL BAT half to death. What the hell would you have done? These kind of guys need to be removed from this planet so the rest of us can live in peace! Thanks to Edmonds, two have been removed! :shock:
Mark my words
written by gabby, September 09, 2008
We haven't heard the end of either of these characters. They both will be frequent flyers in the legal system.
tax payer money
written by jmadison, September 09, 2008
Perhaps we can make get back our tax dollars if we can choose a different sentence.
Put Edmonds and Hughes in a field, sell tickets, and have an old fashioned duel, shooting to the death. Its either that or selling pay for view tickets in an ultimate cage fight. I've got no better ideas. I'm pretty sure that debating whether or not every household should own a gun is a waste of our time.
Chiming in...
written by cale_page, September 09, 2008
Who did or didn't kill who isn't the worst part of this situation... Edmonds was growing pot in a house within a community... Like it or not, there are good people in Clearlake. He brought these acts into not just his life, but the life of those who live around him. The fact that it was ok for him to grow in a house with under age children is deplorable. You may be living next to someone who is growing. It may be leagal. Do you want a shootout in your area? I know that I don't. Edmonds should not be walking free. He should be charged with Two murders and with many other drug related charges. He was commiting a felony when lives were taken. They just didn,t want to make that fight. The grey area between lawful and unlawful have to be defined. No matter what, we shouldn't have pot grown within city limits. Keep it in the hills.
Where was
written by Raphael, September 10, 2008
Edmonds when the kid was beaten?? Looking for his gun?? Just standing there? It's at that moment he could have made a huge difference, and lawfully, to save Dale Lafferty. I wasn't there, I do not know how it happened...I do know defense means just that. To PROTECT oneself or another, not to AVENGE, no matter how angry or full of rage you become, and however justifiably so.
If Edmonds had thrown himself in between the kid and the thug holding the baseball bat, he would have done it to save him, for him...It would have been courageous...but shooting the two fleeing thugs in the back after the kid was already hit and laid on the floor, he did it FOR HIMSELF, not for the kid, not to save him, not to undo his injury, he did it to RELIEVE HIS OWN RAGE. There is nothing noble, moral, courageous, or even remotely legal about that. It might be human, but it ain't legal.
I have made
written by Raphael, September 10, 2008
a lot of comments here, and have expressed strong opinions...embarrassing.
I could delete them all...the problem is I don't really know the details of the situation...so I need to say that my comments are not based on facts, but on my aversion to violence, and on not liking seeing people shot in the back, no matter who they are.
If only the kid could have been saved, no one deserves his fate. That's the tragedy here.
...
written by James, September 10, 2008
My senses alert me that something is wrong.Tried in one county then sentenced in another, what was that all about again? Not able to receive a fair trial here but able to receive a fair sentence. God were do we come up with these people? When as the law allowed for coup de grase? I know the violents I"m capable of and it is tempered by right and wrong backed by the law. Were was the law with the other parties involved in the mess? Sounds like some of the same logic as the sailboat.I say this again two wrongs have not made this right.One will go away for four years the other stays with us, good call.
Thugs plain & simple
written by fastleft, September 10, 2008
I did not say that Edmonds was courageous or noble etc. He is human! When someone breaks into your home at night, by gun point, beats on your family, The CLOVES come off! I don't know the whole story, but i am human and i love my family and i feel Edmonds and his family are the victim here. I can care less about the three thugs!! smilies/cool.gif

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 09 September 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

TwinPine Casino & Hotel Wine Country's Favorite Playground
 
Sutter Lakeside Hospital

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.6040370464325 Seconds