Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
www.goldenfishbooks.com
Shore Line Realty www.shorelineatthelake.com
Dr. Bonner Optometry 994-1488

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Clearlake man to be retried for 2004 murder PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Monday, 11 August 2008
LAKEPORT – A man whose conviction for the murder of his girlfriend was overturned late last year will be retried for the murder this fall.


David Garlow Deason, 68, of Clearlake was convicted in February 2006 of shooting to death his 48-year-old girlfriend Marie Parlet on Dec. 6, 2004.


However, last December the First Appellate District Court overturned Deason's conviction, ruling that the trial court in Lake County “erred in excluding evidence of his intoxication,” as Lake County News has reported.


“He's going to be retried,” said Chief Deputy District Attorney Richard Hinchcliff.


The trial, said Hinchcliff, is set to begin Sept. 9.


Deason allegedly had a blood alcohol level of 0.27 on the night he is alleged to have shot Parlet. The couple, according to court documents, had a disagreement earlier in the day, after which Deason left and returned later that evening. At that point he is alleged to have shot Parlet once in the chest and once in the back from a distance of 18 inches.


Judge Richard Martin had ruled during the 2006 trial that no evidence could be presented about Deason's level of intoxication. That included turning down a request by defense attorney J. David Markham to call a toxicologist to the stand.


Markham had argued that the toxicologist could explain that Deason had consumed as many as 14 drinks to get to the level of intoxication he allegedly reached. Markham also asked that the jurors be instructed to consider the alcohol consumption in deliberations.


The appellate court disagreed with Martin's ruling, saying that Deason's level of intoxication was crucial to the issues of premeditation and deliberation, which are necessary elements in a first-degree murder conviction.


Hinchcliff said the instructions about considering Deason's alleged intoxication will be given when Deason is tried next. “Other than that, it will be the same trial.”


Deputy District Attorney John Langan, who previously prosecuted the case, will work on the next trial as well, said Hinchcliff.


Langan did not return calls seeking comment. Nor did Doug Rhoades, who will be representing Deasn in his retrial.


“Probably the biggest challenge is going to be getting all of the witnesses back in to testify,” said Hinchcliff.


Parlet's son, James Clarkson, of San Marcos, Texas, told Lake County News he was in disbelief when he first heard of the conviction being overturned. He wasn't notified – he found out about it inadvertently on the Internet after searching for press on the original case. That's when the story of the overturned conviction came up.


He called the reasons for the conviction a “loophole,” and said he was convinced of Deason's guilt in shooting his mother at point blank range.


Clarkson said his mother was a “genuinely nice person” whose life was ended before her time. She was a loving mother to him, his brother and sister; she also had five grandchildren whom she hadn't yet met. He's considering coming to California for the retrial.


After his conviction was overturned, Deason was brought back to Lake County this spring. He is being held in the Lake County Jail without bail on a charge of first-degree murder.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)


Trackback(0)
Comments (7)Add Comment
First Year Law School Mistake
written by jazz, August 11, 2008
Don't blame anyone but the judge. This is the most common defense to a murder, intoxication.

The verdict may well be the same but Lake County gets to squeeze the case into their already backlogged criminal trial calendar.
...
written by yellowwing, August 11, 2008
I'd blame the appeals court....there was zero doubt that this man committed the crime. Intoxication is not an issue.

While the jury may not have heard evidence as to the degree of intoxication, the defense certainly made every effort to make sure the jury knew that Deason's main occupation that day and most days was sitting around drinking.

Deason SHOULD do everyone a favor a plead guilty - the bottom line is that he will never see life outside of prison because he murdered this woman.
Another blunder
written by CobbMt, August 11, 2008
Guess to fast to hang the poor bastard.
People do not know how an obnoxious judge can sway a case in his beligerent pre trial rules, then bluster for the public and jury.
Good call, the Lake DA can call another poor slob from retirement and pay him copious amounts of overtime and not like hire another street deputy, or fix a pothole.
I say Paris for DA, like she is ready.
Another waste
written by agenttom, August 11, 2008
of tax payers money...
If I were a juror,
written by Donna Christopher, August 11, 2008
I would certainly want to know ALL of the facts surrounding the matter at hand. It would not matter one whit for me if the guy was drunk as a skunk or not, no one forced him to imbibe and I would have no problem holding him accountable for his actions. Judge Martin SHAME ON YOU for failing to give the citizens of Lake County credit for being able assess the facts of the case and come to a proper conclusion. If the "...trial will be the same." does that mean the same judge? If so, you sir, should not accept your salary. Lake County does not lack good charitable organizations that could use a donation.
...
written by jazz, August 11, 2008
yellowwing: Intoxication is always an issue in a murder case if the person was wasted. It has been the law of the land for far longer than you and I have been on this earth. The judge is mandated to give the intoxication instruction if there is sufficient evidence that the defendant was intoxicated.

Whether the jury thinks that reduces this case from murder to manslaughter is up to them.
Don\'t care
written by DAUGHTER OF MARIE PARLET, December 28, 2008
HELLO...I REALLY DON'T CARE WHAT ANY OF YOU THINK BUT THE DA DID HELP OUT TO MY FAMILY THE WAY HE COULD ..YES THERE MIGHT BE SOME WRONG ISSUES IN THEIRS OR THE JUDGES PART BUT CONSIDERING THE MURDER IN ITSELF NONE OF YOU HAD TO HEAR THE THINGS MOM SAID THAT WENT ON BEHIND CLOSED DOORS..IT WASN'T YOUR MOM/BEST FRIEND..WHY SHOULD YOU GUYS CARE RIGHT??THE FACT IS IS THAT HE KILLED MY MOTHER AND THATS NOT RIGHT...HE WAS ABLE TO GO GET HELP AFTERWARDS SO HE COULDN'T BE TOO DRUNK..RIGHT???NOW HER CHILDREN ME AS WELL HAS TO GO THROUGH ALL OF IT AGAIN...HOW DO YOU THINK WE FEEL...THANKS FOR THE INPUT EVERYBODY BUT ITS NOT NEEDED...

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Monday, 11 August 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Sutter Lakeside Hospital
 
TwinPine Casino & Hotel Wine Country's Favorite Playground
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.3347368240356 Seconds