The announcement was made at the association's July 15 meeting by President Alan Siegel.

The election will be limited to the original seven candidates and will be conducted in September, Siegel said. The ballots will be counted on Sept. 16 and the annual meeting will be conducted on Sept. 20.

The attending candidates at the meeting agreed to the new election. Until a new board is elected the current board will remain in office.

The errors that were brought to the attention of the association office by several residents were twofold.

In the instructions on the ballot it said to vote for four of the candidates, however it also said in another part of the ballot to vote for only two.

The ballot also called for a signature so it was no longer considered a secret ballot as required by state law.

In an attempt to remedy the situation the association office sent out an additional mailer to clarify the ballot. However, because the ballot required a signature it was conceded to be invalid by the board and a new election was called.

Lynn Farmer suggested at the meeting that the association should look into using a mediator to help resolve some of the issues between property owners and the association.

“We can use all the help we can get and it is something that we should look into,” said Siegel.

During the president's comments near the end of the meeting, tempers began to flare with over half the audience on their feet because of a heckler who was disrupting the meeting. Two people left the meeting during Siegel's remarks.

“There are about six to eight people who are very vocal against the association,” said Siegel. “They have conducted a letter writing campaign and some were given guest commentaries in the Record-Bee. They are bullies that are mean to the association, they are mean to the secretaries, they are mean to everybody and they need to be stood up to.”

He continued, “There are less than 30 violations that are currently going on and these people want to disband the association. The association is working hard to protect the property owners rights … they would have to be incredibly stupid to do away with the association.”

At the end of his speech Siegel got a round of applause from many of the 35 or so who attended.

Siegel later remarked that his life was threatened in an online forum by one of the dissenters. “If they are such a large group, why didn’t they all show up?” he asked.

Much of the current controversy in the association stems from conflicting acceptance of its covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) which can be viewed on the association's Web site, www.clrca.com.

Darrell Watkins, a candidate for the association board, stated, “When CC&Rs have not been amended according to the governing document and the association says they have, that's fraud. They're deceiving the homeowners.”

According to the state, the current CC&Rs and bylaws are outdated and require new ones to be drafted and approved. This needs a majority of a quorum to ratify.

The current CC&Rs state that, “Approval by written ballot is valid when the number of approvals equals or exceeds a majority of the ballot votes cast, and the number of ballot votes cast equals or exceeds ten percent (10%) of the membership eligible to vote.”

Watkins, John Stoddard and others insist that the quorum needed is 50 percent of the votes plus one to ratify. They hold that there never has been a quorum reached so the current CC&Rs are invalid.

The association has spent thousands of dollars to write new documents and made several attempts to get them ratified but fell short of 50 percent plus one.

“This is the same problem that the Mt. Konocti Water Co. has,” said Siegel. “They can’t reach this quorum to change from being a ‘for profit’ to a ‘not for profit company.’”

Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (7)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Ha HA
written by kd006, July 29, 2008

As Nelson Muntz would say, can't get a quorum? MORONS! When did mom and dad stop paying people to be their friends?

:twisted:

• 
• +0
• 
• 

my goodness
written by lenny, July 29, 2008

I sure am glad I did not buy a home in the Riviera's. Checking out the link to the site...if I wanted to paint my home I would need to submit a sample of the paint for approval!!

I DON'T THINK SO!!!

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Lenny
written by kd006, July 29, 2008

Probably a blood and urine sample too! Only fools buy a home in a CC&R community and get what they asked for.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

when will the ballots go out?
written by boondoggle, July 29, 2008

This assoc. has been conducting elections for many years wouldn't one think they would have it down by now. Requiring a signature and giving conflicting instruction on voting is incompetence at the very least. The street signs are in dire need of painting and weeding around the area so they can be seen. Some signs are missing so who knows what street they are on unless they live there. Some HOA serve a purpose since they help maintain standards for the community. But when they get out of control it is too much. One commercial building has piles of trash in its parking lot and looks abandoned. This is right on Soda Bay and near the HOA clubhouse where it is clearly visible. A prospective home buyer would think twice about moving here. There is no signage identifing the Riveria as you enter like the other Riviera's (Hgts and West). I could go on but you get the idea.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Alan said
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 31, 2008

..they can't get a majority of the owners to amend the CC&R's so we just do it anyway, right Alan?

• 
• +0
• 
• 

This monster..
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 31, 2008

is not above threatening critics or even the “Free Press” with strategic slapp-lawsuits in an attempt to silence them. He’s breaking another law with his threats and intimidation by burdening them with costs of legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition (California code of civil procedure 425.17) . Winning his suit is not the purpose of his threats. His goal is accomplished when the “Free Press” spikes stories and homeowners succumb to fear and intimidation and abandon their criticism.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Truth by told
written by Social Capital, August 01, 2008

I was also at this meeting, and the problem stems from homeowners who are too intimidated or apathetic to respond to the indifference of the current board. People want to feel that the common sense they have about what they see around them is being heard and not just ignored. There are many properties that are not in compliance with the CC&R's in use by the CLRCA that abound in the suddivision. The current board under the dictatorial rule of the board President is trying to blame those individuals who are vocal about the hypocrisy of the governing documents and harsh treatment for standing up for their rights which is :arrow: coming at them from the Association. The rules are being applied in an arbitrary and capricious manner in regards to their properties, and the only way to address these matters is to do it through a third party mediator. Not through the board members who are inflexible and power mad.

• 
• +0
• 
•