Choose language






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Curry: Are wildfires California's Katrina? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Becky Curry   
Monday, 07 July 2008

Fires continue to burn across California, with the massive blazes in Goleta and Big Sur getting the focus of the state's attention. California's firefighting capacities have been strained beyond their limits.


Residents, especially in Big Sur, have noticed just how few firefighters there seem to be for this blaze, as compared to previous fires in the area. As conservative demands for low taxes and budget cuts have helped slash available fire protection, residents in Big Sur increasingly feel they are on their own, though they appreciate the fire protection they have received.


The legacy of Hurricane Katrina when nobody came to help New Orleans has led some residents to refuse to evacuate out of a belief, evidenced by the facts on the ground, that if they don't protect their homes, nobody will.


This frustrating and chaotic situation is the direct product of conservative attacks on basic government services they want people to fend for themselves.


One of the most high profile Big Sur residents who has stayed behind to protect his property is Kirk Gafill, whose family opened the famous Nepenthe restaurant in 1949.


As he and his employees stayed behind to put out burning embers themselves, he explained to a reporter why he stayed (from an AP report dated July 4): "We know fire officials don't have the manpower to secure our properties," Gafill said. "There are a lot of people in this community not following evacuation orders. Based on what we saw during Katrina and other disasters, we know we can only rely on ourselves and our neighbors."


Such do-it-yourself firefighting led one Big Sur resident to be arrested for setting his own backfires.


Another resident defended that person's actions on the Ventana Wilderness Society's forums, one of the main sources of community information on the fire: ''We have been working on defending Apple Pie from this fire day and night since it started. We watched it grow over the coast ridge, down to the Big Sur River and up over Post Summit. The gov was not going to help defend the ranch even when our homes were about to burn. We didn't think they would either. But they didn't have any problem sending someone to arrest us. Our community just can't accept actions like this. If we didn't do what we did the ranch would be nothing but ashes. I say thank you to everyone who helped us and a thank you for all the firefighters, and pilots who TRIED to stop it from crossing the firebreaks to our homes."


Setting one's own backfires is a desperate and even reckless act but those who do not believe their government will or wants to help them are likely to resort to desperate measures.


Meanwhile California does not have enough money saved for firefighting efforts. During the last decade, in every year but one, California has had to dip into reserves to pay for firefighting, but this year the SF Chronicle reports the gap is much wider.


"But in the just-completed fiscal year, there was a big gap between the actual cost of firefighting and the budgeted amount. The state had set aside just $82 million for such emergencies, forcing it to spend more than $310 million from the state's general fund cash reserves of $858 million. California will have to continue dipping into its reserves until the Legislature and the governor approve a new budget for the fiscal year that began Tuesday ..."


California has come full circle. Hurricane Katrina became such a human catastrophe because conservative budget and spending cuts left New Orleans residents without adequate protection and aid. Californians in places like Big Sur, mindful of that experience and aware that firefighting is currently understaffed, are making increasingly risky efforts to try and protect themselves. Efforts to provide funding for adequate fire protection are opposed by conservatives who prioritize tax cuts over fire protection and who think schools and hospitals should be closed instead to pay for it.


California firefighting has already been badly neglected by decades of conservatism. It's time we rebuilt our public services so that individuals do not feel the need to risk their lives to defend their property.


Or this is our future as Californians?


The cult-like behavior of the tax-cutting members of the yacht-owning Republican Party and their holy relic of "I've got mine" Reaganism, an unreformed and badly outdated Proposition 13, are holding Californians hostage.


How much longer will Californians allow these radical conservatives to assault our public services and dismantle social protection from risk?


How much longer will we give the No. 1 job of government protecting the people to those who don't even believe in government?


I am sick of those who enable these selfish zealots as our state burns.


Becky Curry lives in Kelseyville.


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments
Add NewSearch
Donna Christopher - Brava Ms Curry, well Author | 07-07-2008 10:25:06
put. I get the intent of Prop 13 when it comes to residential properties but it doesn't make as much sense when it comes to commerical properties, those properties can at least pass that on to customers/consumers. The term "conservative" seems oxymoronic lately, only personal wealth gets conserved, our resources and indeed, the very lives of volunteers are readily sacrificed. You cannot increase this nations debt, much held by nations who do not have our best interest at heart and have national security. And a government that cannot provide basic safety to its residents should tread lightly when it wants to arrest them for protecting their own property. And someone, somewhere, needs to find a bathtub deep enough to "drown" idiots such as that wonderful neocon Grover Norquist - or try him for treason. What he preaches is not good for America, neither is what this presidential administration practices. Heckuva Job NeoCons!
Raphael - The neo cons Author | 07-08-2008 15:17:09
have nothing against big government (and the largest increase in bureaucracy ever) when it comes to the police State: cameras everywhere, the (rejected) total awareness program, homeland security, the patriot act, phone and email monitoring, etc etc...The ideal neo con society, and world, is one of total control of the populace through the eventual merging (or extremely close cooperation) of the military, corporate interests and corporate mercenaries, intelligence gathering agencies and police. It is also a return to the conditions existing during the industrial revolution, a systematic deconstruction of every right that had been hard won for the working class and the middle class in the past one hundred years, as well as the invalidation of as many environmental laws as possible.
The revolutionary strategy of these extremely radical neo cons was to flush the government down the drain, and inflate only the military and surveillance to maintain order while society falls apart.
Next will be the development and deployment of weapons in space (against international treaties signed by 180 nations) to control the entire world.
These weapons will be presented as being defensive, but will in reality be weapons of aggression to keep the world in line according to not only corporate interests, but because of basic resources such as potable water becoming ever more scarce. The budgeted development of nuclear power is part of this strategy, as theses weapons will be based on the further development of nuclear energy, and the government needs to pour untold amounts of money in the nuclear industry.
Welcome to hell on earth, American style.
James - The sky is falling. Registered | 07-07-2008 19:16:50
Just the normal progression took by others before. The weight of it all will cosume us. History and all the test done in the 1950 have shown how we will end up. What a time there will be.There have been those for to long that tell the truth and you don't hear anymore.
Raphael - By the way Author | 07-08-2008 17:49:42
the illegal militarization of space by the US is a bi-partisan strategy, which is why both Democrats and Republicans (who both represent corporate and banking interests better known as "national interests") are pushing for the development of nuclear energy to seemingly become energy independent...This strategy was predicted 17 years ago by a prominent activist against weapons in space. It is my opinion that the rise in the cost of oil has been artificially created to facilitate this transition to nuclear energy, without which the eventual deployment of weapons in space could not happen, which would mean that the US would have to forsake its imperial fantasy of controlling the entire world (how sad would that be?)
Remember how government works: the American public has in the past repetitively expressed its opposition to nuclear energy. How do you force something the public does not want? Create or allow a crisis to occur that is even worse (the high price of oil) then offer the controversial solution as the only way out. That's one way to manufacture consent.
As usual it will take one hundred years for people to catch up, as we are trained not to think.
To think is to connect the dots...in the case of the government it is to connect the dots between all that the government is doing and all of its long term strategies, that are out there in the public domain for public examination. Unfortunately to connect the dots (to think) and see a pattern emerging between actions (facts) and long term strategies (facts) is called believing in conspiracy theories. So the public is taught never to connect the dots, never to think, by being given fragmented information, bit by bit, every bit of information disconnected from every other, and presented as standing on its own under some incomplete or partially true (and partially false) agenda, such as energy independence in the case of the nuclear industry.
jmadison Registered | 07-08-2008 20:20:22
So Raphael, explain your theory a little more. Who is in on it? Are Barak Obama and John McCain being groomed for their future role in pushing the "militarization of space" and for America controlling the world? Or is it over their heads and out of their control?
I agree that this country has gone downhill these past 8 years. But I don't want someone saying I can't connect the dots (think for myself) by not coming to the conclusion that oil prices are up simply because our government and corporations want the rise of nuclear power so that we can put weapons in space.

I won't say it is a "conspiracy theory", mostly because I don't want to hurt your feelings, but there has to be more effective ways to get the Bush/ McCain/pro War crowd out of power.
Raphael - It is only Author | 07-09-2008 02:14:51
partly my theory...I do not know for certain that oil prices have been allowed to sky rocket to push for nuclear power. But that's not the main point...nuclear power had to be imposed on the American public, one way or another, to allow for more research and development in this field and the eventual deployment of space weapons.
It is true that government forces unpopular agendas on the public by allowing crises to occur, then offering their own "solutions" to implement these unpopular agendas (see 9/11 and the war in Iraq, and many other examples).
But you can ignore this obvious strategy if you feel uncomfortable with these ideas.
The main point here is the militarization of space. You can get all the information you need on the Pentagon website. It is not a secret, but a long term goal of the US.
This illegal (according to international laws and treaties) goal of having TOTAL and UNILATERAL military control of space, consequently of the entire world, through the deployment of OFFENSIVE (not defensive as we are told) weapons is a completely bi-partisan agenda.
Who is in control? The Pentagon, and all dominant US economic interests that have everything to gain by the assertion of US hegemony over the world and its diminishing resources. You could say it is the military-industrial complex, with the added pressure of diminishing resources and of the growth of other competing nations, such as China.
This is not about a shadowy cabal of some private society members bent on controlling the world...no "illuminati" or "skull and bones" theories here. This is about an IN YOUR FACE strategy for the US to dominate the world...not too difficult to understand, if the public could only think beyond what will happen next week or next fall.
But then perhaps the American public thinks it is a great idea for the US to dominate the world...if not now, it will by the time our government and its think tanks are done manufacturing consent through new fears and other strategies, that will present the militarization of space as an UNAVOIDABLE strategy meant to DEFEND America...sounds familiar?...It is so OBVIOUS it is pitiful people do not see it...but then again they probably do not care, and will accept the grotesque, obscene and truly evil reality of nuclear weapons encircling the entire planet, and of one nation attempting to impose its will on all others, if government uses the right arguments and sales them this agenda using the proper propaganda tools.
James Registered | 07-08-2008 22:04:30
Its a mind set that progression that a child would take if not held in check. We have allowed bureaucrats of all strips to insure that the government works for their benefit. I can't sue the bureaucrat, I have to sue you the citizen if I am to get my rights. I have no rights because its a personnel matter. Were is the legal controling authority to insure those rights? What we have is dishonest people corrupting our government and we don't care. What do I know I'm only a old man that thinks the oath the shysters take should mean "to protect the Constitution" not their interest.
Dogman - Control burns Registered | 07-09-2008 01:01:58
Many years ago, CDF, Fish & Game, BLM, US Forestery, and land owners did control burns in the fall & winter. It help make fire breaks. It was a practice that went on for years. If you ask some of the old ranchers and old Fire guys , they will tell you control burning is a good thing. Maybe a few control burns/fire breaks will help.
James Registered | 07-09-2008 09:59:19
I am aware most think that I am redundant and I'm truly sorry for that. It has been my cause to gather your ears as a aggregate to form change with a local system a government that starts off with a lie. "The oath to protect the Constitution" What should be done is they will say words to the fact that they will follow all rules,laws or regulations that may govern your duties. For six years I have received Lake Countys rules, regulations,procedures and laws but not my rights that should bring justice. The problem with most is we talk around the issue not about the issue. Good life to all.
DDean - Fire Registered | 07-09-2008 11:22:56
Dogman your right on.As a youngster i can remember the hills burning.Year after year small control burns.Nothing big,no massive ammounts of fuel build-up.Probably the most important thing upper management cared about the forest,instead of a fat paycheck and a do nothing attitude.Deer populations were fat and over the top.Mo Curry told some great fire stories.
jmadison Registered | 07-09-2008 13:26:22
So...
To sum up the 3 discussions above, I think we need to check the constitution, and see what it says about controlled burns and the militarization of space.
James - guilty Registered | 07-09-2008 22:56:25
I do confess the use of Becky Currys post to poke the eyes of local bureaucrats but you would have to reach to see were I said we would have to check the Constitution for controled burns. Did think it was humorous.
Raphael Author | 07-10-2008 03:51:57
The current imperialistic ambitions (The New American Century) of the US go hand in hand with the internal collapse of America...the desire to build military bases wherever oil can be found, and allowing for unprecedented military spending, bankrupting the nation in endless conflicts in the process, has for direct consequence the neglect of all that truly matters: education, health care, decent jobs, energy independence, infrastucture.
It is very likely that environmental crisis will become more frequent and intense, and costly to governments and nations...perhaps the earth itself will force humanity to stop quarreling and to cooperate as no one will be able to afford the cost of environmental disasters and to wage wars at the same time.
Perhaps nature itself will force us to become sane at last, by hurting us globally in the only place that seems to matter to our species: the pocket book, since we as a general rule are not intelligent enough to voluntarily cooperate and live peacefully in a state of harmony and balance with each other and with all life.
Fires, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, the melting of the polar caps, droughts and severe storms, etc etc, could be the earth's way of collecting the rent, of restoring balance, of humbling us and putting us back in our place: not above the creation as we arrogantly think we deserve to be, but a mere part of it.
By bankrupting nations, natural disasters will force us to change course or perish...there will be no more time for futile debates as to why, how or when, or who did it.
Only registered users can write comments!
 
< Prev   Next >
Forecast
Partly Cloudy Today: Partly Cloudy
62°F | 44°F
Partly Cloudy Tomorrow: Partly Cloudy
61°F | 45°F
7 day forecast...

Calendar: click on a date to submit an event

« < November 2008 > »
S M T W T F S
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
« < December 2008 > »
S M T W T F S
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3