Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Council will allow medical marijuana dispensary moratorium to expire PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Friday, 11 April 2008
CLEARLAKE – With its moratorium on new medical marijuana dispensaries set to expire this Saturday, the Clearlake City Council chose not to put a new measure in order but instead to enforce current city ordinances.


City Administrator Dale Neiman asked Police Chief Allan McClain to research some options to deal with the thorny issue of dispensaries in the city limits. McClain brought the results of his work to the council Thursday night.


Last April, the council extended for a year an interim urgency ordinance that had been adopted the year before, as Lake County News has reported.


That ordinance created a temporary moratorium on medical marijuana dispensaries within the city limits, but it may have been unnecessary and contradictory to California's Proposition 215, which legalized medical marijuana, said McClain.


The moratorium also couldn't be extended any longer, McClain said, and if a new one was introduced it would have required a new set of legal arguments.


The city originally had adopted the measure hoping that some precedent-setting medical marijuana court cases – including one in San Diego County – might be resolved and shed some additional light on how cities should deal with the contradictions between state and federal law, said McClain.


But with those suits still in the courts – and likely to be for years to come – McClain suggested that the city could find itself on the wrong side of a lawsuit if it took a position outside of established city ordinances that currently don't allow business licenses to be issued for any activity “in violation of any federal, state or municipal law.” Since medical marijuana isn't recognized by federal law, that ordinance would, by default, cover medical marijuana dispensaries.


McClain said that dispensaries currently operating in the city have business licenses for other products – such as medicinal herbs – and some didn't get licenses at all because they knew they couldn't.


“There never have been any licenses issued in the city of Clearlake for someone to dispense medical marijuana,” said McClain.


Council member Joyce Overton said she would like the city to follow the lead of other municipalities and require medical marijuana to be grown in enclosed spaces to prevent the smell bothering neighbors. McClain said he was looking at such an ordinance now.


McClain also asked the council for how his agency should proceed with respect to those dispensaries that continue to operate.


Neiman said the council could direct police staff to cite dispensaries, which they don't currently do.


Dave McCullick of D&M Compassion Center urged the council to allow the dispensaries to continue to operate in order to give patients safe, legal access to organically grown medical marijuana.


McCullick said he believes the state eventually will win the medical marijuana argument with the federal government, and pointed to legislation set to be introduced that will stop federal agencies from becoming involved with medical marijuana decisions made by states.


He also argued that business licenses are not regulatory but a way to obtain business revenue for the city. Medical marijuana is beneficial for many people, McCullick added, noting that dispensaries such as his have been “a good part of the community.”


City resident Alice Reece asked if D&M Compassion Center pays sales tax. Neiman said the state collects it and the city receives 1 percent of the 7-percent tax.


Mayor Curt Giambruno asked McClain if there had been problems over the last two years with medical marijuana purchased at the dispensaries bing sold to children.


McClain said it's hard to say where the marijuana that is found on the streets originates.


However, he added that his officers have arrested people with large amounts of marijuana who said they were working for local dispensaries. He said there have been other incidents – including shootings – linked to medical marijuana.


He said he felt Proposition 215 was “way too open” about how medical marijuana should be handled.


McClain said he has been to McCullick's business and spoken with him, and hasn't had any issues. Nor has the police department made any moves to shut down the dispensary.


The only way to change the current police approach was for the council to direct it. “If you don't do that nothing's going to change as we go forward,” said McClain.


Ultimately, the council agreed with McClain's suggestion to simply rely on city ordinance in order to avoid potential liability.


Clearlake's approach to medical marijuana has been less aggressive than that taken by Lakeport. In that city, the council adopted an ordinance in March of 2007 to ban medical marijuana cultivation within city limits. The move was taken because officials cited concerns over public safety and plant odor.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (2)Add Comment
Kudos to the City
written by Donna Christopher, April 11, 2008
of Clearlake for working smarter, not harder. Instead of defending yourself in court on a losing issue you did the compassionate and fiscally responsible thing. The City of Lakeport should hang a banner across Main Street that sez "Sue us - Please". I wonder if they even know if they can afford a defense as it sometimes appears that they are managing (not balancing) their budget using a Magic 8 Ball.
Kind Of Interesting
written by purplegirl, April 11, 2008
"McClain suggested that the city could find itself on the wrong side of a lawsuit if it took a position outside of established city ordinances that currently don't allow business licenses to be issued for any activity “in violation of any federal, state or municipal law.”

I can appreciate the position of the city of Clearlake on this. I think, they made the best decision they could, considering the confusing circumstances.

Though, it makes me wonder what the point of having a measure pass locally if it is contrary to federal law and cannot be protected or enforced properly (without the fear of civil and criminal conviction). I have to ask, why did we pass a measure if we can't apply it? (I am not expecting an answer... by the way.)

I also find it interesting that less than 80 years ago people were just as concerned and confused over the issue of alcohol. And, back then, when alcohol was illegal, violence... yes gun violence... was just as prevalent (if not more) concerning alcohol as it is today concerning marijuana. I think, most of us, we look back on that thinking how absolutely silly (if not insane) that was. I think, what is even more silly (and insane) is that alcohol still kills more than 40,000 people a year (and that is just in provable automobile accidents...which do not include cases of alcohol related domestic abuse deaths, alcohol induced murders and suicides, or terminal diseases related to alcohol) and yet we are all freaked out about the one pot grower in the neighborhood rather than massive amounts of alcohol consumed in the neighborhood just because pot is illegal and alcohol isn't. We really need to compare statistics, to shed some light on how completely whacky this subject is.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Friday, 11 April 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 0.93483901023865 Seconds