Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Kelseyville school board votes down return to 'Indian' mascot PDF Print E-mail
Written by Maile Field   
Wednesday, 19 March 2008
KELSEYVILLE – The Indian was reaffirmed as a mascot of the past at a school board meeting here Tuesday night after a two-hour session of audience input, which followed four hours of input last month.


It was an evening notable for its tears, nervous speeches, passionate pleading and … individual open-mindedness.


After board members added their half-hour of comment regarding the use of a logo and name the native American community called “disrespectful,” Kelseyville Unified School Board Trustee Gary Olsen made a motion “not to return to the Indian mascot.”


The motion was approved 4-1 with board member Chris Irwin alone voting, surprisingly, against the status quo, citing a loyalty to the taxpayers who elected him. “I feel we have better things we should be talking about,” he said, adding, “I’m not trying to be a rebel, I really don’t care what the mascot is.”


About 100 people showed up for the continued agenda item that brought voices of students, elders and everyone in between. Last month’s meeting drew almost four hours’ comment on the subject before it was continued.


The town doctor, Kirk Andrus, was the first to step up to the podium Tuesday night. He said he has lived in Kelseyville since 1979 and that he was graduated from Dartmouth in 1972 as a Dartmouth “Indian.”


“A large part of who I am,” he said, “is based on the fact that I went to Dartmouth.”


Andrus said it is not about his being an “Indian,” but about the institution, its curriculum, culture and his education.


“I think of myself as a Dartmouth graduate,” he said, “not an Indian.”


Andrus, a former school board trustee himself, commented that he felt “it is incumbent on us to listen to the local native Americans.”


The doctor continued, “When my grandfather sold a blanket that was infected with small pox … that’s germ warfare. But let’s not play the blame game. Use of an Indian mascot distorts and trivializes a native culture.”


Marcie Cadora said she learned that the Tomales “Braves” compromised by giving up their logo but not their name and she proposed the same. She said she telephoned Clayton Duncan, the man who originally asked the board to stop using the mascot, and she said she also called several board members.


“No one seemed interested in a compromise,” she said.


Cadora repeated, as she had at last month’s meeting, that the term “Indian” is used in pride, that it is not meant to be derogatory.


Kim Olsen said she grew up near the Big Valley Rancheria and rode the bus with many native American children and she never saw racism. Olsen suggested adopting a logo designed by local tribes and an annual general assembly at school to educate all children about native culture and history.


“A compromise would make the job of the board much easier,” she said.


Bob Prather said he was a 1945 graduate of Kelseyville High School and an “Indian.” He also said he had seven sons and numerous grandchildren go through the schools.


“I understand why many would like to keep the Indian mascot,” he said. “I also understand that if I were an Indian, I would not want others parading around with my image.”


Prather said it’s about citizenship and understanding others’ feelings. Referring to a petition circulated among “Indian” mascot supporters reported to have documented 700 signatures, Prather commented, “There are a lot of names on the petition … but there are a lot of names that are not on the petition.”


Jacque Santana – whose daughter is a freshman “Knight” – said that change is hard. “Maybe I didn’t like it, but it is time to move forward,” she said. “Personally I think the ‘Knight’ is a really lame mascot.”


But what is “blowing my mind,” she continued, “is that they let this issue divide them.”


Lisa Mammina, who repeatedly emphasized that she is from Ukiah, broke the tension with humor by saying she was confused about who were Indians and who were not. She motioned to the crowd on the left, many of whom wore sweatshirts reading “Always an Indian,” and said, “I think it’s really cool they (motioning to the Indians on the right) are not asking for their land back, they’re asking for their name back.”


“It hurts them,” she said simply.


Several students spoke in favor of returning to the former mascot, stating they felt school spirit had fallen. “Now it’s like walking into a retirement home,” one girl stated, adding that learning about the Pomos would be “cool, awesome ... let’s do that.”


Phillip Murphy said he has a daughter in Kelseyville High School who “loves and respects her teachers” and feels good about her school. The other daughter graduated last year and doesn’t feel the same way, he said.


The older daughter, Murphy explained, is enrolled in an ethnic studies class at Sacramento State University. “We are portrayed as an example of modern day racism,” Murphy said.


When the class was asked by the professor whether anyone was familiar with the issue, “she was ashamed to raise her hand,” Murphy said, “and say, ‘Yeah, I went to that school.’


“I have a simple question,” Murphy went on, “Do you value the trust, respect ... and cooperation of your neighbors more than a name on a jersey? I hope you do.”


Murphy concluded, “I want to see it get put behind us tonight ... permanently.”


With “Indian” mascot supporters on the left and native Americans and their supporters on the right, applause following each speaker was clearly divided.


And then, two hours into the session, Kerry Roper stood up — from the left side of the aisle.


First she identified herself as a hairdresser, pointing out her son-in-law, Chris Irwin, seated among the board trustees. She also mentioned that she had many family members in the room, including her husband, who had just spoken in favor of returning to the “Indian” mascot.


“Tonight’s meeting completely changed my mind,” she said. “We are using something that belongs to someone else.”


“I would be very upset if every salon in the county changed their name to ‘Vintage Hair Salon,’” she said, referring to her own business. “I have to agree with the native Americans that we should not be called the Indians.”


Roper had the last word.


Board Chairman Peter Quartarolo broke the astonished silence with humor. “I think there’s an extra bed at our house.”


After the other board members explained their positions, Quartarolo opened a book from the district’s own “Hate in Schools” curriculum.


“Right here on page three,” he said, “it recommends we get rid of ethnic mascots.”


Quartarolo said that he has had a lot of friends remind him how important the 'Indian” mascot is to them.


“My ultimate responsibility is to the children of this district,” he said. “You read all these papers ... there’s all this evidence it teaches bigotry. That I can’t tolerate.”


E-mail Maile Field at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (17)Add Comment
Thanks
written by James, March 19, 2008
to the radical hatemongers that keep this issue at the forefront.
Good for them.
written by James, March 19, 2008
I'm convinced your passion that desire for the mascot return is sincere.That fervor of expression has no malice only true respect for those you would honor. Problem, if you were aware of the history,the struggle for selfpreservation, there would be no lack understanding on your part.Your words are only rhetoric because actions show other wise. The emotions of this issue took hold and bad leadership pulled you along. This is the same supervisor that belives its permissible to cover up the lies of county employees. Lets be better people say we are sorry and with their good will move on.Thats not me above but agree with the sentiment.
The beast is dead!
written by smurf, March 19, 2008
4-1, as was predicted by many long before the vote took place. Best surprise of the night was the way DeChaine handled himself, not just on this issue but everything that came on the agenda beforehand.
Methodical, thorough almost to the point of tedious, but beyond doubt compentent.

Irwin was the opposite, predictably in WAY over his head, and unable to make any sort of rational, logic-based statemets-on any subject! Instead there were several insights into how little he knew about the district (in spite of having five months to get up to speed), and his vote on the mascot issue produced some of the most bizzare reasoning I've ever heard at a board meeting-it was like he was talking about and voting on another issue!

It should also be pointed out that the board didn't just say they were against using Indian mascots they were absolutely set in their convictions, this was no hard choice as the decent thing to do was quite clear.
Common sense
written by Raphael, March 19, 2008
decency and morality have prevailed, thank you Kelseyville board members, you rose to the occasion! And for those who still do not get it it's quite simple: you don't take something from someone else (like their own identity, albeit distorted and stereotyped) without asking...when you do steal it and they tell you it is hurtful to them, you stop. If you don't, the hurt becomes intentional...In this case, it would have been a continuation of that 19th century mentality that took everything by force from Native people, without asking, and without care...it would have been a clear perpetuation of 19th century racism.
You caved in
written by lcsage, March 20, 2008
to the hateful and SD radicals. Congratulations. I find it interesting that most of the students wanted the old name.
lcsage
written by James, March 20, 2008
Hello by the way. Please excuse my lack of understanding. What is the SD radicals? If it is true the kids wanted the old name, I would chalk that to being stupid but the adults should know better. I'll say it again supervisor Brown inflamed this bigotry with his rhetoric and waving a $1,000.00 check. Straight out I will say Brown is a liar and harbored those that lied.Semper Fi.
Most of the students
written by Raphael, March 20, 2008
did not want the old name, neither did most of the adults...there were at the most 20 students at the meeting, and only 700 signatures on the petition...do the math. The radicals were the John Wayne-Rush Limbaugh wannabes who sat on the left side of the room, the "Kelseyville Indians forever" out of touch with reality crowd! By the way wasn't that check waving clearly an attempted bribe, and illegal?
They threatened, they attempted to bribe, they whined, and in the end they left even before the official vote, because they are poor looser...
Raphael
written by James, March 21, 2008
Only 700 signtures well that should put Brown over the top for supervisor.I as a former Marine a John Wayne type have strong views. Thoses that harm children, put the pistol to their head and all others that need eternel sleep for their actions. Labels can be misleading. I would never put the name of Jonh Wayne with supervisor brown, Jonh Wayne would never Lie,cover up the lies or insight the bigots. We are gung-ho but we don't kick old ladys is the shins.
James
written by lcsage, March 21, 2008
SD as in Shlt Disturbing as in the long haired freaks with the left over sixties mentality that post here. It's what they do with their time. I believe that only a small part of what they say is true, the rest being inflammatory embellishment. They are the lackeys of the far left. The stool colored BOS member is a phoney, fraud and charlatan and needs to be flushed.

Semper Fi and God Bless America
I am sure they are rejoicing
written by lcsage, March 21, 2008
One of the SLA members was recently released from prison.
James
written by Raphael, March 22, 2008
Well may be not John Wayne, after all he was just a Hollywood actor who was content to play roles in war movies looking "tough" while real people with real backbones went to real wars...
Fat Rush Limbaugh wannabes then? Ditto heads?
I read a lot of very nasty labels here, mostly attacking the left. I am neither left nor right, call me independent, my allegiance is to life, to the earth, to humanity, not to ideologies or dogmas.
And I might be a sh-t disturber, I don't mind, there is a lot of it around as you know.
I know there are many decent people, like you, in this nation who disagree with the types of bigots Brown incited, but he was not the only one behind this mean move to re-instate the old name. This might seem like a small matter to many people, but I saw it as one more insult on top of so many horrible acts committed against Indian people for several centuries. Of course it is necessary to "get over" things to heal and move on, but forgetting the past is the surest way to assure that it will be repeated. A Scottish man said that.
Symbols
written by James, March 22, 2008
Raphael: To be sure the John Wayne of the movies never saw the hell holes of my time.Good for him, life is not fair a fact I'm sure you are aware of. I look at this world as it is not as I would like it to be. Those that infer and put labels on those of us that would open our mouths, thats the price we pay. I just give my views its not personal and if otherwise they know who I am. Evil done in our name comes from both sides this diatribe is used for their power base. Take stock and see how free we realy are.Good life to you.
Some People Think
written by lcsage, March 22, 2008
it's all about them. Sorry, life doesn't work that way. Some are in the same category as Hussein Obama's anti America hatemongering preachers.
I have lived
written by Raphael, March 23, 2008
in other countries James, and I have also traveled...I can honestly tell you that I have never met people who are so critical of their own nation as are Americans. It is both good and bad...it is good because no one should ever feel complacent, or so blinded by pride as to be unable to see the truth or to acknowledge the past. It is bad because there is so much cynicism, so much pessimism, so much gripe, it is all around. In spite of my own criticism, and I understand how offensive it can feel to be criticized by a foreign-born individual, even a citizen (but my problems are with modern civilization as a whole and with the gangster elite, not with America), this is still the greatest nation, not because of its military, political or economic power, not even because of its government, which we all know has become the best money can buy, but BECAUSE OF ITS PEOPLE. And you are one of them, so hat's off to you!...
On another note, I have never seen a people as afraid of their own government as are Americans, and I would like to understand why...that can't be good, and there is so much paranoia circulating about the government. We all know politicians are self-serving and venal, and we know who controls the nation, who is in the driver's seat, who has enough power and wealth to have influence, and it isn't you or me...but why so much fear? A fearful people can't feel free, can they?
wachale
written by jbrookes, March 23, 2008
Thomas Jefferson would argue this one with John Adams, but in the final analysis, this embroglio is what democracy's all about. Ask yourselves how such an issue might have been resolved in any country where students are taught in madrassas and ruled by Sharia Law.
jbrookes
written by James, March 23, 2008
I'll show my ignorance, What is madrassas and Sharia Law? I know what imbroglio is and do agree about Jefferson and Adams.
In truth
written by James, March 23, 2008
Raphael: I have said more than one time its not the government but the people charged that duty for our rights. The words on paper guarantee nothing without the enforcement from those that take the oath to do so.Maybe the protesting has just cause. Maybe one is confronted with acts of malfeasance so intolerable. With their actions so egregious it defies understanding. To be told" thats just the way it is" has not set well with me and because we move on their arrogance grows to the point "The ends justify means." This aggregate has been overwhelming. Power has corrupted them,so I am here with my lips to their ear and tell them "their not God." Maybe just maybe we are fearful because we are not free and fell the yoke of tyranny.Good life.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.1883950233459 Seconds