Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Board approves IHSS contract PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Thursday, 21 February 2008
LAKE COUNTY – Despite some supervisors' concerns about wanting more specifics and, in some cases, more accountability, the county on Tuesday approved a contract with the union representing its In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) providers.


The agreement, tentatively reached Jan. 8, was approved overwhelmingly by IHSS providers, who were represented by the California United Homecare Workers Union.


Although it's been years in the negotiations process, the contract wasn't greeted with universal enthusiasm amongst the Board of Supervisors, acting in the capacity as the Lake County IHSS Public Authority.


Supervisor Anthony Farrington wanted more specifics included in the memorandum of understanding regarding an enhanced IHSS provider registry, which would offer a wage above the $8.33 an hour – plus 60 cents per hour in health benefits – that will now be offered to all of the roughly 1,400 IHSS providers in the county.


Social Services Director Carol Huchingson, whose department oversees the IHSS program, said it would take time to work out the enhanced registry and its details. “I would hesitate to have the language be more specific at this time and absolutely commit to an enhanced wage.”


Farrington said that, for him, the driving issue was making the IHSS program a quality one.


He also noted his concern about the lack of drug testing, an issue that has come to divide the union and the public authority.


Supervisor Rob said union President Tyrone Freeman had told the board last year that he supported drug and background testing, “and we saw what happened to that.”


Supervisor Jeff Smith said it was time to move forward and get past the sticking points of the past. He said he has confidence an enhanced IHSS provider registry will work in Lake County because the union has put a similar program in place in Los Angeles County.


“It's for the benefit of the folks who are out there working,” he said. “I want to see it happen.”


Brown remained skeptical.


Getting up from his seat on the dais, Brown put up a display of several blown up, poster-size mug shots from the Lake County Sheriff's Web site showing several IHSS providers who had been arrested and convicted for various crimes.


They included Andre Stevens, convicted last year of a murder in Clearlake. Stevens, who had a previous robbery conviction and had done time in state prison, worked as his girlfriend's IHSS worker, as Lake County news has reported.


“These are the IHSS workers that I don't think we should be representing,” said Brown. “We shouldn't be giving them a raise.”


Brown said his first priority was for the clients. There are about 1,600 IHSS customers in the county, many of them elderly and disabled, according to the IHSS Public Authority.


“We've had a long history of fighting against giving these people a raise without drug testing and background checks,” Brown said, gesturing to the mug shots.


He added that he considered it a slap in the face to the good IHSS providers to lump them in with the criminal element.


Board Chair Ed Robey agreed, but said ultimately the state Legislature had created the system and its inequities.


Brown said it would do little good to appeal to Sacramento, where “all we have is some whiney activist.”


Many people are subject to drug tests and background checks for jobs, Brown said.


Supervisor Denise Rushing took a different approach.


“I'll just say this, no one wants to give criminals a raise,” said Rushing.


Gesturing to Brown's mug shot collection, she added, “These are the Willie Horton pictures here,” referring to a man released on a prison furlough program who later committed robbery and rape, and whose story was used against former Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis in the 1988 presidential election.


Rushing said she felt the contract was a path to improving the program.


“I want to see the workers get a raise and I think it will have an immediate affect on their lives in Lake County,” she said.


Brown responded that he didn't have as much faith in the IHSS program as he used to. He suggested that it was “so corrupt and sabotaged” that it may need to be scrapped and replaced.


Any of the convicts he presented pictures of, said Brown, could get out of prison and return to work as an IHSS provider. “That is so fundamentally wrong that that can be allowed to happen.”


Smith said not approving the agreement would hold back many good people who deserved a raise. The agreement, he suggested, gets the county to a point where it can start working on improving the program and putting pressure on legislators.


“It might not be exactly the way we wanted but at least it's a start,” he suggested.


The board ultimately approved the contract 4-1, with Brown voting no.


Robey said afterward that there's “a lot of pent-up frustration involved” for the board relating to the IHSS negotiations.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (8)Add Comment
IHHS and BOS
written by socialworker, February 21, 2008
This is step upward for IHSS Workers. If the BOS wants to do something really helpful, they could support funding to the Public Authority to hire case-aide folks to go into the homes and do some mindful monitoring on a regular basis. Rather than posturing about disappointments, it is being pro-active, taking responsibility and assuring safety for the vulnerable and the workers.
to late but......
written by lenny, February 21, 2008
it would seem very simple to set up a process of immediate hire or not!! for IHSS workers That is where this contract blew it!!...i.e. Carol's Dept. would have an RN qualified to assess skills and detect alcohol and drug impairment. It would be the RN that would have the final call for needed education, testing or NO HIRE! 5150 potential to injure yourself or others. The person would have the ability to appeal, of course... Each district would be staffed with an RN "team leader", under Carol. If you have 1400 IHSS applicants and 5 districts, that's about 280 per district...give or take, that would mean the RN would interview 56 people a week...doable.
A interview, application, and skills testing would remain on file. Needed follow-up and follow-through would occur.
fair is fair
written by smurf, February 21, 2008
I could show you four mug shots of local cops who have committed crimes ranging from child molestation to armed robbery, Rob's little horror show means squat. And for the 800th time, money is better spent on monitering providers rather than sending the money out of county to drug testing labs, piss in a cup for 8 bucks and hour and change-no thanks!

Maybe Rob could volunteer to pee in a cup and let his whole career and reputation ride on a correct test procedure EVERY time. There is NO excuse for why this took so long, from the get-go this program has been under-funded and the detractors whined it was bad because they designed it NOT TO WORK by starving it of cash-millions in matching funds were lost!
Not that the union was a beakon of clarity or wisdom, but isn't it the supes job to show leadership for the whole community rather than just a small segment of it?
Didn\'t know Rob
written by Donna Christopher, February 21, 2008
was going into vulnerable folks homes to do his supervisor's job smurf. If he does take that up, yeah, he needs to pee in a cup. Perhaps Sheriff Mitchell or the Lakeport Chief can confirm that law enforcement is not subject to random drug testing as you proffer. If there is so much money in drug testing, and no one in the county can do it, sounds like a business opportunity to me. Know a convicted 'lewd & lascivious acts on a minor under 14' that was on parole and registered as a sex offender that was IHSS. He got popped for dui while on parole and sent back to the pokie. He gets out at the end of the month and I hear is planning on going straight back to IHSS work. On an unrelated note Thank You Rob for your vote on the courthouse screening. As a matter of fact I AM still using my civil rights and freedom and I appreciate you trying to protect them. Apparently I'll need to leave my right to unwarranted search & seizure at home if I have business at the courthouse. Oh yeah, I feel soooo much safer now.
and yes Donna
written by lenny, February 21, 2008
every one of us that lives here knows various individuals collecting IHSS that should not! Off the top I can name three right now!

This program was in need of help BEFORE A RAISE! But it's too late!!
facts
written by smurf, February 21, 2008
none of the BOS members have ever had to pee in a cup to keep or get a job. That sort of humiliation is left almost exclusively for the lower middle class and poor, besides airline pilots you'd have a hard time finding anyone outside those two economic stratas who have to have to be drug tested.

You do large scale testing like some want and you'll get MANY false positives, but the pro-testing people don't have an answer for those who have had their job taken from them-do they care that their plan would ruin innocent people's lives? Do they know how easy it is to beat the tests? Do ALL criminals do drugs? Where is the data suggesting how much of the criminal population would get busted if they were tested?

Why is it the director of the program would rather spend the testing money on supervisors who would actually monitor the providers and base their evaluations on the quality of the care provided? Drug testing is no panecea, yet the pro-testing people act like it will solve most if not all IHSS problems-it won't. How many of Rob's Willie Hortens would pass the drug test? Give some credible answers and maybe the issue should be looked at again, until then quit the whining.
sigh
written by taxismom, February 21, 2008
so.... protect our 4th ammendment rights by opposing magnetic screenings at the courthouse door..but not the 4th ammendment rights of ihss workers?
or if rob had his way, teachers and probably anyone drawing food stamps, or getting medical..

"We have always believed drug testing unimpaired workers stands the presumption of innocence on its head and violates the most fundamental privacy rights," ACLU Executive Director Ira Glasser says in the report. "Now we know that sacrificing these rights serves no legitimate business purpose either."
http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy...0930.html

Gee Taxismom
written by Donna Christopher, February 21, 2008
I didn't know I had the choice of not showing up for jury duty and that I HAD to take a job as an IHSS worker. And I guess since the ACLU has weighed in, well there ya have it, the gospel on the 4th Amendment. Glad to see your back :wink:

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.4068539142609 Seconds