Choose language






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Annan Jensen: Pack punditry and predictions PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sophie Annan Jensen   
Tuesday, 08 January 2008

Print reporters love to repeat an old joke about television reporters: if they had been covering the Lincoln assassination, they would have asked "Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you feel about the play?"


Tuesday's news coverage of the New Hampshire primaries seemed to be taking that hypothetical question as Journalism 101 instruction, as the press roared into reaction to Hillary Clinton's emotional moment on Monday.


Did she cry? Or did she just mist up a little? How did Barack Obama react, and how did the Clinton camp react to Obama's reaction? And what did Gloria Steinem have to say? And did other feminists agree with Gloria or not? Did John Edwards betray himself as a nonfeminist?


It was a slimy perfect example of pack journalism, as explained to us in 1973 by Timothy Crouse in "The Boys on the Bus," his book about life on the road covering the 1972 presidential campaigns.


There was actually other news on Tuesday. The United States Chamber of Commerce announced it plans an all-out attack on candidates professing populism. NBC said it would air a bare-bones version of the Golden Globes awards Sunday night because of the writers strike. The stock market tumbled when an AT&T executive talked about an economic slowdown.


And the endless wave of primary gossip and speculation rolled on, as if New Hampshire were the general election. As if we didn't still have South Carolina, Nevada and Michigan and the primaries in 24 Super Tuesday states on Feb. 5.


It's embarrassing to see the hysteria of the pack. Makes me wonder if they're now getting bonuses based on the number of words they file, or if they delude themselves that a majority of the voting public actually cares about the trivia they're reporting. It would be such a relief if some of them could bring themselves to ask the candidates for their reactions to the other news of the day.


Still, Tuesday's political news was not a total loss. The Miami Herald, often good for a laugh, dredged up an old story about election predictions by the Santería spirits. It involves a fable about a coconut and is pretty much incomprehensible, except for the last sentence: "Perhaps the deep message of the 'saints' is that it's still a horse race and too early to be collecting winnings."


Sophie Annan Jensen is a retired journalist. She lives in Lucerne.


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)




Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments
Add NewSearch
James - Moresite Registered | 01-09-2008 08:12:24
As I'm new, only to this site More, more and more. Please when did journalist stop asking who,what,why were and when. Fluff is that what we have become? Please write more.
purplegirl - Attention IP:208.106.99.xxx | 01-09-2008 13:04:58
The corporate mass media is simply concerned with the bottom line, it's more about money than anything.

It reminds me of the saying, "Sex sells". Like it or not, sex sells. In fact, it is a hugely profitable industry. Yet, most people would say publicly they don't want smut in their neighborhood. Yet, enough people have bought enough Playboy and Hustler to put Hefner and Flynt in a pretty cushy place. Howard Stern would have been fired rather than given a multi-million dollar contract, if someone wasn't buying what he was selling. If sex didn't sell, a huge industry would go under.

The same with the corporate mass media. They realize that emotion based fluff sells better than "just the facts, Ma'am". If it didn't, they would be out of business. Obviously, enough people are buying it to make it profitable. (It may not be you or me but somebody is buying it.)

When people stop buying the fluff (and buying products which support the fluff) the corporate mass media would either have to change their tune or go under. It's about money. If you don't like the way the mainstream news is covered then the best thing to do would be to write and tell them how you feel, threaten to stop watching them and then stop watching them and stop using their sponsors products (and write to tell the sponsors why you aren't using their products and educate others). If you really want to see change, you have to start the chain of events that will lead to change and hitting a corporation's bottom line is where you need to aim.

For this very reason, I have turned off many mass media channels and turned to alternative sources (like here) to get my news.
purplegirl - One Note - Concerning Coverage Registered | 01-10-2008 12:53:43
With all this fluff floating on the surface, I wonder if any of the big channels bothered to report that in the township of Sutton New Hampshire they found a city clerk had reported 0 votes for a candidate who actually had 31 votes. Now, to me, that is news we need to know. Voting fraud is a huge crime yet it seems to have gone unreported by big media.
shannon9166 - Perceptive, intelligent commen Author | 01-10-2008 14:27:05
As someone formerly in journalism as well,I applaud the observations you just made. I am sickened by the "horse-race" and "celebrity" coverage with little to no coverage of the crucial issues at stake.
One major issue is the reliability of our electronic voting machines. (See purple girl, above). Second Sunday Cinema is screening "Hacking Democracy" this coming Sunday. It examines their reliability,& is well made. It's free, and all are invited. 5:30 Clearlake United Methodist Church
James Registered | 01-11-2008 10:26:41
For those of you that your revolution to evolution is short.Pick up movie "NETWORK" The year it came out was 1976 You might enjoy. "I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it any more!" True then, more so now. A must see.
get smart Registered | 01-11-2008 22:16:11
Anyone expecting to educate themselves on the facts of anything from just one source is eluding themselves. We are a society busy explaining away why we can't take any personal responsibility for anything we do.

We have what we have; because that is what we want. I would rather be playing some mindless computer game on line; or searching out some smut over reading a book or an article about the war. To research some news story I heard something about earlier in the day; are you kidding!

To watch an informative television program such as Frontline and miss Miami CSI or home shopping would be unthinkable; you dare even think such a thing; let alone propose it; and you would be considered crazy! The mindless are just that; mindless!

The mindless would rather be spoon fed their information compared to having to think! Long gone are the days of the white hat symbolizing the good guy! Along with those days being gone are the days where anyone can trust in a newspaper owned by a television network owned by a cookie company really cares if you get any real news at all.

The mindless is that faction of slave labor needed in order to keep this economy fueled; an economy fueled by the mindless consumption of mindless toys.

As early as forty years ago we were being warned that the news media was being taken over by the corporate world; and now today you have exactly what we have; a cheap mindless enslaved work force; that is fast being replaced by an even cheaper work force from overseas.

Yes it takes time to inform yourself about who to vote for or what way you need to vote on any given initiative; but that is what you have to do in order to self-govern; invest the time.
Only registered users can write comments!
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 09 January 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Forecast
Mostly Sunny Today: Mostly Sunny
62°F | 39°F
Mostly Cloudy Tomorrow: Mostly Cloudy
60°F | 43°F
7 day forecast...

Calendar: click on a date to submit an event

« < November 2008 > »
S M T W T F S
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6