Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Council approves bond, looks at meeting broadcasts PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Wednesday, 21 November 2007
LAKEPORT – The Lakeport City Council took measures that will allow it to move forward next month with a bond measure and discussed broadcasting its meetings. {sidebar id=32}


The council members – sitting as the City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District board – approved Resolution No. 2311, which allows the city to issue a $3 million bond in December to pay for sewer system upgrades.


The upgrades, according to city staff, were required by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board because of system capacity issues.


Getting the bond in order, said city Utilities Superintendent Mark Brannigan, has “been a long time coming.”


To qualify for the bond, the city had to raise its sewer system rates, which it did at its Nov. 6 meeting.


Henderson Capital Partners LLC is underwriting the bond, according to Brannigan's staff report.


“We’ve got a good interest rate being presented to us now,” Brannigan told the council, with the rate set at 4.85 percent.


Councilman Buzz Bruns moved to accept the resolution, with the vote 4-0, with Bob Rumfelt absent.


Without the bond, Brannigan reported that the city could have been forced to reduce services which could result in regulatory action, including a building moratorium.


Council debates Webcasting


City Engineer Scott Harter reported to the council on his research into setting up a Webcam in order to stream council meetings on the Web.


Thanks to the donation of a Webcam from Andrea Anderson on Nov. 6, and other offers for hardware donations, getting set up won't cost much, only about $100, said Harter. However, the main cost could be the streaming video provider, which could cost from $39 to $129 a month, depending on how much data they broadcast.


Those monthly costs, said Harter, haven't been accounted for in the current budget.


Pointing to the nearly empty gallery, Harter suggested that making the service available might get more people involved.


Mayor Roy Parmentier asked Harter how long it would take to set up a video streaming system.


“Half a day,” said Harter. “It could be done very quickly.”


Said Councilman Ron Bertsch, “I think all of us agree we would like to get out there more than we are now.”


Councilman Buzz Bruns said they should look at the budget before making a decision.


Parmentier suggested setting the system up and then beginning at the first of July.


“I don’t think we’re going to be in a better budget situation the first of July,” responded Councilman Jim Irwin.


Bertsch said he would really like to see the city get on the cable television network as a way to reach more people. However, last month the city turned down a proposed agreement with the county and City of Clearlake to take part in the PEG Channel, citing high costs.


Parmentier suggested tabling the issue until the start of the year, after they had reviewed their budget.


“I don’t see our financial condition being any different in January than now,” said City Manager Jerry Gillham.


Gillham did, however, tell the council that they had the money to cover the Webcasting in the council's own small budget portion.


Gillham said he was “leery” of taking donated items such as Webcams and software. Rather, he wanted to analyze the best camera systems and have an integrated video system. “If we're going to do it, let’s do it right.”


Bruns suggested that the council's current public address system wasn't adequate, and that people who attend the meetings often complain that they can't hear the council. He said that system should be fixed first, and asked Harter to look at those costs.


Harter said he didn't anticipate hardware costs for a camera to be more than $700.


City Clerk Janel Chapman said one of the main issues at this point is that the city only records meetings on cassette tape, which have poor audio quality, and that the city has no duplication capability.


“It’s not just the PA system, it’s creating a way the record can be made available in other media,” she said, a sentiment with which Gillham agreed.


Lakeport resident Suzanne Lyons told the council she didn't understand why they would turn down free equipment, and suggested they should consider it.


Regarding the public address system, she said, “We can hear you in the back when you want us to hear you.”


Lyons said there are “a lot of little asides” amongst council members, and she suggested they needed to speak into their microphones and address the public more clearly.


“When we don’t know what’s going on, that's what bothers us,” she said.


The council directed Harter to research better camera options and bring them back for discussion in December.


Clearing up misleading numbers


During comments to the council toward the meeting's end, Police Chief Kevin Burke offered clarification of recent reports in area media about county crime statistics.


“Lakeport is not the rape capitol of the county,” said Burke.


He explained that the media reports offered crime statistics for the entire Lakeport zip code, and didn't separate out the city.


Burke said no rapes have been reported in the Lakeport city limits in 2007 or 2006. There were two, however, in 2005.


The seven rapes the reports mentioned all happened outside the city limits, Burke said.


“The article was not entirely clear on that,” he said.


A second article reported 21 sex crimes in Lakeport in 2006, when there actually were two in the city limits, Burke added.


Parmentier said he had been getting calls on the stories, and admonished a reporter in the audience that it was important to make clear the difference between sheriff's jurisdiction and that of the police department.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (6)Add Comment
Another good reason
written by kd006, November 21, 2007
"Bertsch said he would really like to see the city get on the cable television network as a way to reach more people. However, last month the city turned down a proposed agreement with the county and City of Clearlake to take part in the PEG Channel, citing high costs."

Doesn't do any good for those of us who have Satellite TV service either.
good point, kd006
written by purplegirl, November 21, 2007
Kd006 what you say is true. A webcam and web broadcast would make it so that it would be accessible to all (as EVERYONE has access to a computer via their public library system). That is why I gave them the webcam.

What really irks me is that they came up with this "budget" issue concerning the webcam. Before I gifted them with the webcam, I told them where they could find the software FOR FREE on the official site of the maker of the webcam. So, software shouldn't be an issue. The webcam also has a built in mic which would mean people would have to speak up but they SHOULD be doing that anyways. They should be speaking loud enough so that people who attend the meeting can hear them at the far end of the room. That is a given. Then, there is this budget for broadcasting issue. Well, I researched that, too, before giving them the cam. They could broadcast for free via places like www.ustream.tv and www.blip.tv and most places have the ability to record live showings so that they can be archived (FOR FREE) and available wherever and whenever you choose. So, they are making issues out of non issues. Kind of sad when teenagers all over the U.S. are able to have live shows daily with practically no money at all but a city council can't get it together enough to do it.

And... where they get that it will cost $700 for a webcam I haven't a clue. My friend just bought a very good one to replace the one I gave the city council and it cost him about $75 (and that is top of the line).
Good for you
written by Donna Christopher, November 21, 2007
purplegirl, you saw a problem and presented a solution. It appears the City Council sees your solution as the problem. Their reasons for not making this happen immediately do not pass the smell test. #1 thing government should be is transparently accessable so that they are "user friendly" to the citizens they serve. Perhaps there are more solutions out there in the Lakeport community. Allowing more people to see what is going on in local government may yield citizen assistance such as purplegirls. Let's pick up the rock and see what's underneath. And really, the City can't even copy a cassette tape?? Your entrusted to run the sewer plant, water delivery, police & fire protection etc and you can't copy a cassette tape. And once again, the tail wags the dog.
D
written by purplegirl, November 22, 2007
"Their reasons for not making this happen immediately do not pass the smell test"

I love that. Couldn't have said it better.

I am thinking, since meetings ARE public, maybe a citizen (or a few citizens) should grab a webcam and a laptop and start broadcasting the meetings. I would, except that I don't have a laptop and I can't get to the meetings but anyone with a laptop and a cam could actually do it. Even a teenager at the local college... which is sad when you think about how a group of grown men can't get it together... it isn't like you have to be a rocket scientist or the salary of one to do it.
Some more thoughts...
written by kd006, November 22, 2007
This is interesting, since it seems the city's of Clearlake, Lakeport and the BOS are all "working" on this in their own little world. There was some recent article discussing how Clearlake had discussed a contract with the PEG channel for their broadcasts and the cost was prohibitive. Funny how these three entities can't get together and come up with one solution. There are a few minor technical difficulties to overcome but I think what stops them most is if the meetings were broadcast and archived the public would be informed and be able to see their past votes and flip flops.

Before the Internet we used to save newspapers for the once a month recycling pickup, when I would read an article about some public official and it seemed they were saying the opposite of what I had read a week or two ago. I'd go to the pile and pull out a past article; sure enough they had changed their tune, either from public opinion or pressure from some special interest.

Certainly a couple of thousand dollars can't be standing in their way, I think the costs may be a little higher since webcams are not designed for wide angle or distance shots. It may require multiple cameras and switching or a camera operator to properly capture the meetings. This should not be an insurmountable problem, I don't know what if any programs our high schools and Yuba College have but there are probably some willing students who would jump at the chance to participate in production of these video records, gain experience and some extra credits. The technical details of how this can be done should be easy to find out, many other California cities video their meetings and must have worked out the bugs. Of course the answer will probably be each entity will have to hire a consultant of their own for 5 times the cost of a years worth of web hosting before they abandon the project.

I also recall reading somewhere that Humboldt College was doing something with Mendocino County to provide free wi-fi high speed internet access area wide, Lake County unfortunately is not included in their plans. That would allow those of us without access to cable internet to actually watch streaming video, I know I can't on 56K dial-up.

This sounds like a good opportunity for a grassroots effort by the citizens of Lake County to brainstorm a way to video and distribute the meetings, perhaps with private funding. At the least they could be filmed and transferred to DVD that would be available at the public library for viewing or multiple copies to be loaned out.
Leaders
written by James, November 27, 2007
We have leaders that can't do before they can do.So it takes a long time, Hope they don't forget the quagga mussel.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.1076860427856 Seconds