Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Watkins: Civics and First Amendment Journalism PDF Print E-mail
Written by Darrell Watkins   
Saturday, 28 July 2007

Newspapers do best when they report news and are not news, themselves. Some publishers don’t understand but their papers can make news headlines, themselves, when they hide news from their readers. Yes, there are papers that hide news. They think it’s OK to keep readers in the dark. Some call it “spiking.” More and more publishers are falling into this trap; publishers of big papers and little papers. Civics students say they’re “part-of-the-news” papers instead of “news” papers.


The New York Times, one of the biggest papers, is itself a stinky story, these days. They no longer publish, “the news, the whole news, and nothing but the news.” They print stories that are flattering to friends or a certain political party and spike reports that are hostile. Some observers say, big advertisers and government agencies apply pressure to kill stories at the Times. Other reports tell how editors slant stories and print opinions disguised as stories in the news section. Apparently, editors think their readers are too dumb to know. It’s embarrassing to watch. Some say it’s no longer a newspaper but a party line for the communist left. Times’ reports have become a tainted tale others are telling.


Most subscribers aren’t dumb and eventually find out when their daily goes off the track. They may be helped in their discovery by the publisher of a rival paper. Good journalists print all the news all the time, even when it’s about another paper. They never cave in to big promoters or government representatives who want stories killed. Trustworthy papers can in fact make money telling horrible stories like that of the Times fiasco.


One Internet newspaper, the Drudge Report, has become a huge success by posting stories other papers spiked. Readers’ ears perk up when they hear a paper is hiding news. Like the elephant, they never forget.


Second-rate publishers think they’re doing nothing wrong when they print part of the news. It’s my paper and I’ll print what I want, they suppose as they entrench themselves in tall ivory towers and lock the doors. Big companies will always send in big checks to pay for big adds, they assume. Little subscribers who made them successful are forgotten. They’re surprised when big advertisers stop sending big checks because little subscribers stop buying a party line rag.


When circulation numbers drop, foolish publishers do all the wrong things to reverse the decline. Sometimes, they think readers want to be entertained so they print entertainment instead of news. Other times, they imagine sex sells so they hire glamorous representatives who look like call girls. They “dumb down and tart up” in a vain effort to stop the slide. Nothing works, however, until they go back to printing all the news all the time and make a sincere effort to rebuild trust with readers.


Good journalists work their trade like a marriage with subscribers. They know the connection between reporting and civic duty. In first year journalism, they learned the Founding Fathers gave American reporters Free Press security with an obligation to use it. Yes, Free Press is a duty as well as a privilege. Free Press guarantees government can’t control reporters to hide part of the news from the people. First-rate publishers practice this freedom and never develop comfy relationships with government agents. Government has three branches; judicial, legislative, and executive. Judges, policemen, congressmen, governors, district attorneys, sheriffs, presidents, council members, school boards, and school superintendents, are all some of the government’s employees. Publishers who’re seduced into informal relationships with government representatives are two-timing their readers. They’re sleeping with the enemy. They betray constituents in the community. Voters can’t vote the rascals out if they don’t know who the rascals are. Disloyal dailies, themselves, make unpleasant news stories that need to be told.


Faithful editors also apply the “Free Press” principle to business promoters who try to control news by canceling adds. Wise editors know, advertising income is directly related to readership numbers so they stay loyal to readers and hang up on fat-cat marketers who want to get them in bed. Dedicated newspapers protect their reputations and are always, of the subscriber, by the subscriber, and for the subscriber.


Unfortunately, two local papers, (Lake County Record-Bee and Observer-American) are following in the footsteps of the New York Times. It’s a great tragedy for local voters and taxpayers. They can‘t get the information they need to make democracy work. Publisher Gregg McConnell has made himself a tall ivory tower and shut himself in. Apparently, he believes he has no civic duty. He’s rapidly losing the respect of his “little” subscribers. It’s a terrible mess and another interesting story worth reading.


McConnell started bad when he came to Lake County, by assigning a daft reporter to code enforcement who immediately developed a comfy relationship with government authorities. Front page stories began to appear showing government is good and taxpayers are bad. One unfortunate Clearlake Oaks resident found his picture on the front page of McConnell’s paper because he had an old car in the yard and a roof leak. Code enforcement red tagged his house. Everyone who took a high school civics class was alarmed. McConnell’s articles made government agents look like heroes and citizens look like criminals. It was clear from the beginning, McConnell understands Free Press backwards. He protects government from the people.


One concerned citizen called McConnell on his infidelity to subscribers. A letter writer from Kelseyville, Darrell Watkins, wrote a civics letter and submitted it for the opinion page. McConnell saw it as criticism and didn’t print it. Watkins also purchased four copies of “We the People” and sent them to McConnell and his top employees for remedial civics training. A credentialed teacher, he also volunteered to tutor McConnell and his editors. McConnell thought this was the height of haughtiness and didn’t accept the offer. Some good did come out of Watkins’ effort, however. McConnell stopped going out with county code enforcement officers and coming home late with government lipstick on his collar. Unfortunately, reports say he’s become an “item” with other government agents and fat-cat marketers around town. Subscribers have a right to know about these indiscretions. He just can’t keep his journalistic pants zipped up.


McConnell’s most recent and ongoing affair is with government representatives at Konocti Unified School District. President Bush’s no-child-left-behind law identified failing schools in that district. Minds are a terrible things to waste and children left behind should make very, very big headlines. A Free Press would ring alarm bells long and loud until everyone knows KUSD trustees are a bunch of rascals. They could quickly be voted out of office. Taxpayers are paying tens of millions of dollars every year to provide schools for their children and they‘re not getting their money‘s worth. Unfortunately, McConnell‘s papers aren’t a Free Press. He can’t keep his journalistic marriage vows with his readers because he and some of his reporters are sleeping with the enemy.


Some readers were utterly bowled over when McConnell splashed the front pages of two papers (March 20, 2007) with the glowing picture of Louise Nan, superintendent of KUSD. Louise was “woman of the year“ burbled McConnell’s reporters for spending “years working in the KUSD.” Her district has failed Lake County for years and she receives front page fame. What was McConnell thinking? Should Lake County taxpayers believe failure is success? Should a government representative of a failed school district receive great honor from the Free Press? Questions continue and the story gets worse.


Nan returned the award favor. Nan nominated and Observer-American editor Cynthia Parkhill received, the prestigious “award of appreciation” from the “Association of California Schools Administrators.” How cozy! Newspaper editor Parkhill puts government leader Nan on the front page of her paper and government leader Nan nominates Parkhill for a grand award from her school organization. One hand washes another. What a snug little relationship! Yes, Parkhill’s own paper did her write up.


From all this, it’s apparent Parkhill has been assigned to cover school news. When she writes a school story (like a recent report on Pomo Elementary) most readers think the schools are getting recognition when they’re failing. Parkhill’s stories lull taxpayers to sleep. She’s like the watchman that whispered when he saw the enemy and the watchdog that ran under the house when burglars came. Education thieves are stealing knowledge from her master’s kids in broad daylight and Parkhill doesn’t want to “alarm” anyone. She returns home late at night to her readers with rumpled hair and government cigar smoke all over her clothes and thinks nobody will notice. Civics students do notice, however. They understand how softball coverage of important news is directly related to cozy relationships between government and the Free Press. Unfortunately, Lake County taxpayers continue to spend tens of millions of dollars for schools that continue to fail.


Former Lower Lake High School (chemistry and physics) teacher, Russell Hunt, wrote about the sad state of Konocti schools in a “Speak Your Mind” letter: “The children are wild and running the school. There is absolutely no discipline and little or no learning going on. The average child is … graduating with an eighth-grade education. Bottom of the barrel state test scores are evidence of this.” This is the news that McConnell hides in a small letter on the opinion page.


McConnell recently added another paramour to his government harem. He met recently with the new Clearlake police chief, Allan McClain (Observer-American, July 18, 2007). McClain, like most highly paid government agents, is very smart. He understands McConnell’s weakness. He knows courting the “Free Press” means job security for him. Yes, McConnell responded. “Police Chief McCain should be applauded for his efforts to reintroduce a personal connection between the citizens of Clearlake and the peace officers who work to keep them safe,” ardently cooed the publisher in his report. How sweet. Unfortunately, McConnell didn’t take the opportunity to report on drug trafficking, burglaries, missing persons, and unsolved murders in Clearlake.


Democracy could work in Lake County. It can’t until the Free Press returns. McConnell needs to find another line of work. Civics students hope the new publisher will be loyal to his readers. They pray papers will print all the news all the time and stop consorting with government fanciers. Voters will get enough information to throw the rascals out when they don’t get what they pay for.


Darrell Watkins is a graduate of Ambassador College, Brickett Wood, UK and a graduate of Pepperdine University School of Education, Los Angeles. He lives in Kelseyville.


Lake County News welcomes commentary items from its readers. Submit them for consideration to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it . Guest commentaries are the opinions of the writers and do not necessarily represent the views of Lake County News, its staff or contributors.


Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Trackback(0)
Comments (20)Add Comment
Excellent Article
written by purplegirl, July 28, 2007
This is an absolutely wonderful commentary and so very very true. Luckily, more and more people are waking up to the fact that we are not always being told the entire story and in some cases the truth and so they are seeking out the truth on their own. Thankfully, with the internet, there are more and more options to get the real news from real people who are not bought and paid for by corrupt corporations/individuals. It is sad that we are having a harder and harder time trusting our news sources to tell the truth and it is even sadder that some of the higher ups are trying to shut down alternative sources of the news where we get the truth. Though, your article simply shows me that there is hope and that more and more people are becoming aware of it.
?
written by smurf, July 28, 2007
as usual, Darrell stars as the hero in his own letter, what a humble fellow! Darrell tells us that the NY times is a lefty tool, but doesn't mention they led this nation into both the Viet Nam and Iraq wars-how progressive of them! Then darrell whines he didn't get his letter in the R-B, how sad! Maybe they got tired of his ill-informed drivel, or the reaction it gets from the vast majority of the readership, who have a hard time following his "beat the kids until they submit" mentality. Yep, what we have in Darrell is the American version of the Taliban, 2007 edition, only the attire and language is different. Yeah, journalism sucks these days, because of the corporate takeover of the profession, not because of liberals or any other reason, and nobody supports corporations over the public like the republicans-like Darrell. Clean your own house first Darrell, then you can give some advice that might be worth listening to, until then think more-write less!
Isn\'t my alter ego grand?
written by derhoades, July 28, 2007
First Mr. Watkins makes a few points, although most have been made before in many other venues, and some of which brought my agreement as well. But about the middle I realized that I was reading the commentary not of reason but of delusion. Darrell, if you're the author of this article, why do you refer to yourself in the third person? I thought only British royalty was permitted to do that (or are you actually a Royal in disquise, or was this really a piece of satire, where it would be more acceptable?). Assuming you take yourself seriously, and from your past ramblings I'm sure you do, if you said or did something, most mere mortals would say "I said" or "I did" rather than distance yourself from your own actions, as though admiring them detached and from afar. That alone was enough to deflate most of your bloviating, and remove whatever validity your points might have otherwise had.
yawn
written by patsy, July 28, 2007
nfm
you are a communist
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 28, 2007
Go live in another country. DW
great mind!!
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 28, 2007
purple girl obviously has a great mind. You can tell she has a great mind because she agrees with DW. Why don't more people have intelligence? DW
hero or villain?
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 28, 2007
DW admits to being a hero. He likes being a hero. A hero wants kids to read, write, and do arithemetic, instead of spending lives in state prisons. A hero wants the Constitution and democracy to work. A hero wants a Free Press to tell it like it is. DW was born to be a hero. DW is like Kenny Rodgers' "The Greatest." When he strikes out he thinks he's a great pitcher. What does smurf want to be, a villain? Villains don't answer questions to ideas. They say bad things about those with whom they disagree. Some people call this name calling. Smurf could be a hero if he said something wise about a Free Press. He probably won't because he's probably a villain. DW
alter ego or ego altered..
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 28, 2007
...deroades might find his ego altered if he tried writing third person, once in a while. The world has enough of; I, me, my, and mine. He might study this practice in first year journalism class if he took the time to enroll. One of the best known third person writers was John who wrote the book of John in the Bible. Obviously Roades doesn't read the Bible so he wouldn't know. If he did read John, he would not be reading of reason but of "delusion" because it's just "bloviating." "Ramblings" in third person deflate and remove whatever points John might have had, according to Roades. A lot of people get their feet stuck in their mouths in this reply section of the commentary but this is one of the worst cases DW has ever seen. His foot is so big and his mouth is so small, how will Roades ever get it out? DW
would Jesus be a slumlord?
written by smurf, July 29, 2007
Hey Darrell, could you clear this point up for us please-are you God or does god just speak through you? Know what the rest of us call someone who takes it upon themself to tell us EXACTLY what God thinks? Psycho and egomaniac come to mind, and when you add in the fact that Mr. third-person thinks he's a "hero" (ever actually looked up the definition of the word DW?), and you have bloated-head nut-job to the list. What have you EVER done to make this a better place to live other than shoot-off your overly-large mouth about a lot of things you no nothing about? Give us the list Mr. "hero", and we'll decide if you fit the moniker. I don't think you're a "hero", "patriot" or "christian", I think you're just a know-nothing old windbag who's in love with himself, and who takes the lord's name in vain every time he presumes to speak for her. My advice is to do something useful, something productive or genuinely Christian with the short time you have left on this earth, and give your keyboard and all the rest of us a rest.
I think
written by Raphael, July 29, 2007
you really need to take your medication, you are becoming dangerously agitated again..."You are a communist, go live in another country"?
That's original! If you thought for half a second rather than shoot from the hip you would see that some of the arguments I make against government corruption by the military-industrial complex are close to your arguments about government and big business corrupting the integrity of the mainstream media...a point on which "liberals" like me agree, but apparently for different reasons...But then you seem to be deprived of logic and rationality, and react to other people's opinions as a rabid dog reacts to any nearby movement, it looks like you don't know who or what to attack and bite next, and without cause...
No, I am not a communist because, UNLIKE YOU, I do not support the idea of authoritarian rule or government whatsoever (that means NO communism in any form, and it also means NO KINGS or QUEENS, whether they are from here or from YOUR idea of heaven)...and unlike you, I do not support Bush, the man who would have loved to be king, and his policies which favor the rich and the powerful and destroy the environment, and have made a mess of the Middle East in order to perpetuate a state of permanent war and take control of the oil.
I don't think anyone can figure out where you come from in your opinions, one minute defending the poor, then attacking the "liberals" who want to somewhat help the poor or protect the helpless, another time attacking government and big business, then telling someone who does the same to "love it or leave it"...Are you out of your freaking mind or do you just love to project a lot of hate out there?
It's fun in a perverted kind of way though, when someone has a couple of minutes to kill, to discover your latest exchanges...to see how irrational and inconsistent you will be just for the sake of antagonizing others
no preaching!!!
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 29, 2007
Hey smurf..thought there was no preaching in this paper. There are several Conservative Christians that have sermons just for you. God knows you need them. Has the policy changed? Back to name calling and hatred. If smurf attacked failing schools with as much energy as he attacks DW, there would be no child left behind and Smurf could be a hero instead of the villain he is. Remember, Smurf, heroes get the girl and they ride off into the sunset and live happily ever after. You can do it. DW
leave it or love...
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 29, 2007
ANYONE, reading Rafael's first comment must conclude he's a communist. If it sounds like a communist, walks like a communist,and looks like a communist, well it must be a Godless liberal. That's how Rafael sounds. Perhaps he doesn't know. Democracy is not a very good form of government but it's the best there is, said Churchill. DW agrees. DW
Hey Daaaaryl
written by Donna Christopher, July 29, 2007
Democracy is a great form of government, I'd love to get back to being one but thats hard to do under King George. And for you to tisk tisk name calling - if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black I don't know what is. Dude, your a pubbie so start acting like a good one. Support Big Pharma and get on your badly needed meds. And it is a shame that you can't rein in your craziness long enough to have a decent debate with Raphael - I think we all have something to learn on a daily basis. Maybe I need meds also as I find something in what you both write that I agree with most times. My apologies up front folks, this posting will probably be followed by some foam at the mouth irrational, untruthful (i.e. bearing false witness) and irrelevant blather aimed at me, flung by DW. Real productive.
DW\'s ego obviously is all cap
written by derhoades, July 29, 2007
My religious preferences, readings, training or upbringing are none of your business. I do not use religion, which is faith not fact, to prove or disprove any point. I take no issue as to what you may believe, only as to how that belief may permit you to influence or try to influence others, and how it affects your choices. The faith itself is not disputed, which is why one of the few remaining freedoms we have is that of religion (unless you believe any eastern religion, which makes you an enemy combatant or terrorist according to GW and the conservative right). And next time you want to disparage me in print, at least try to spell my name correctly, which makes me question your fact-checking further...
loony left..
written by Kruk Ed Strait, July 29, 2007
DW did not mispell DR's name. Again it was the typewriter. More and more typewriters are made in China, these days. It's hard to get good quality. DW finds it interesting, so many disparagers don't like to be disparaged. DW's mama always told him hypocrites don't like to be treated the way they treat others. DW smiles to those who smile and disparages to those who disparage. He ideas to those who idea and calls names to those who name call. Can DR say he doesn't disparage? Also what does DR say about the foot in the mouth? DW
By the way
written by Raphael, July 30, 2007
If you truly are apolitical, believing that the solutions to the world's problems cannot come from worldly government but only from "heavenly government", then you are no more conservative than me, in theory...Do you really think government and the corporate world (big business, the "military-industrial complex") that have as only allegiance the elite really care about Biblical values? The elite has no political or religious loyalty, it is only loyal to profit and worships only power. It is economically, not ideologically, conservative. Get your hands on some actual history, the elements that took control of the world (banks, industrialists) long ago took advantage of the dividion of the world between communism and capitalism (they financed both) to keep populations easy to manipulate while they took off with the loot, a large portion of which came from hyper militarization, wars, and weapon manufacture and trade...
They have created the so-called Federal Reserve, a PRIVATE not a Federal institution, controlled by private world banks, to subvert the American system and take complete control, and they are moving us in the direction of world government (think REALLY BIG government) not headed by the Biblical laws you claim to uphold but by TOTAL CORPORATE CONTROL, better known as FASCISM according to Mussolini himself, who was somewhat of an expert on the subject. If you believe in the Constitution, its latest greatest enemies have been the neo-cons, and if you believe in democracy, give it a good hug, it is nearly out the door, the neo cons established the foundations of ABSOLUTE Executive (Presidential) powers using the threat of terrorism as a tool to confuse and intimidate Congress into compliance with their agenda, which is the GLOBALIST agenda, the NEW CORPORATE WORLD ORDER.
Nothing new here
written by Raphael, July 30, 2007
The corporate and governmental take over and control of the mainstream media is nothing new, perhaps people have forgotten the 60's, when peaceful demonstrations by high school Latino students for exemple where brutally suppressed in East LA and then presented on the news as "student violence"...And all the anti communism propaganda that had nothing to do with any real situation, in most cases, but was handy to portray all acts of dissent and all disagreements with the policies of the government as communist conspiracies (has anyone also forgotten that Martin Luther King was not "honored" by most of the press but presented as an extremist and communist sympathizer, following the lines of government and the FBI?)...
Truly, a democracy is only as good as the information and the education that allow people to make free and enlightened choices...Whoever controls them controls democracy, which may explain the sorry state of the American educational system, which has been sabotaged, and it has not been liberals who have had control of the press and government in the last 100 years, but economically conservative elements lead by the industrial-military complex (finance capitalists). It is very ironic to hear conservatives borrow liberal arguments and turn them around for their own agenda. By the way, there is no right or left in America, only a center and a right, or perhaps today a right and an extreme right, the entire world knows this and laughs at our political system of "free choices" (why do you think all politicians sound alike, and why do you think they are scared of the creation of a viable, strong, as yet uncorrupted, third party and will do anything to suppress such a party independant of the industrial-military complex which controls this nation?...) There are no other democracies in the world with only two political parties, the "good cop-bad cop" American political system is truly a sad joke on the citizens and very tiresome...And just to make things really really clear again for DW, the industrial-military complex does not follow a liberal agenda and is nowhere near the left, but on the other side, financially conservative...when we consider that the development, manufacture and sale of weapons are the backbone of our economy, and that the US economy is in a sorry state when we have no "enemies", we can perhaps understand that there is no place in America for too many liberal policies unless they also serve the aims of the elite, such as subsidies, and that there seem to be only room for media manipulation, public fear, some periodic war mongering, and two parties that dance to the same tune in slightly different manners to make the citizens think they are actually living in a democracy .
Donna,
written by Raphael, July 30, 2007
Thank you for the thought of wanting to see a debate between DW and I...I would rather do it with ripe tomatoes, they are not as sharp as words yet more colorful...
Seriously, no one can truly debate with DW without going straight to the core of his religious beliefs, because that's where he takes refuge when his inconsistencies and lack of logic are revealed, and I don't feel like attacking anyone's religious beliefs, unless these beliefs step on my toes or those of others (such as in the case of the physical punishment of children, if anyone did this in front of me, I would stop them).
DW is sort of entertaining, I have seen and heard similar individuals on San Francisco or LA street corners, usually no one pays attention to them, but this is a rural area with limited entertainment, and he obviously likes to be the center of any kind of attention, even from those who call him a nut.
The fact that he refers to himself in the third person might be due to a belief that he will be elevated to some position of prominence (Royalty?) in some future "heavenly government" after the "rapture", nevertheless I don't think it is appropriate to attack someone's personal beliefs, after all such beliefs and hopes might be all that prevents a person from sinking into total madness, as a sort of mental opiate that only seems to fail when questioned (so let's all be very careful).
Of course I think many are really tired of the BS of the religious right and of the neo-cons, but I would much rather discuss issues separately than argue with DW about his interpretation of a Bible in which I have no interest (not even a morbid curiousity to see what inspired religious wars, crusades, inquisitions, the burning of over 20 000 European women in the middle ages, torture, dismemberment, disembowlment on the public square, and some of the neo-cons ideology)...
If DW was to shove a Bible in my face (or the Koran or the Tora or even a phone book for that matter), of course it would be a different story.
In the meantime, if he wants to call me a "communist goat", who cares? (It sounds like an insult from the Taliban, by the way...Could all fundamentalists be alike?) It merely demonstrates he is unwilling to use his mind to debate, only his mouth, well, may be not really his mouth, as I suspect him of borrowing heavily from some well known conservative pontiffs' endless supply of foul wind...
Little irony, here.
written by George J. Dorner, July 30, 2007
Am I the only one seeing the irony of writing a letter to the editor to decry how abysmal newspapers are?
Typewriter\'s fault?
written by derhoades, July 30, 2007
As someone far wiser than I, and there are many (DW not included), it is a poor workman who blames his tools...
Disparaging? Your comments, yes. You, no, because I do not know you. So your comments are the only things by which you are known. When they don't hold up to criticism or scrutiny, what else do we have by which to evaluate the writer?

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Saturday, 28 July 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.456433057785 Seconds