Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
Lucerne Elementary teachers ask questions about school unification PDF Print E-mail
Written by Lucerne Elementary School teachers   
Friday, 20 November 2009
Lucerne Elementary School teachers have written this letter to express concerns regarding unifying Lake County school districts. We believe that before any changes should be considered, all focus should be upon improving the education of the students in our county.


Our questions are as follows:


l) How will these changes affect our small school?


Student programs: As a small, cohesive district, we are able to quickly tailor our efforts to our own students’ needs. In a large district, decisions would be made by an administration that doesn’t necessarily know our students’ unique needs. We also risk further loss to the personalized learning environment when teachers and students get moved around within a much larger district.


Test scores: We have worked very hard to have the resources and collaboration needed to address student test score improvement issues. We have stayed out of “Program Improvement” by knowing our students and using our resources to meet their needs. If we unify, how will our test scores be impacted by movement of students and loss of revenue?


2) How will students be affected by changes in accessibility of administration?


Presently we have daily access to our administration and all questions, concerns and issues are taken care of immediately. Our accessible administration knows all of our students by name and each student’s strengths and needs. Administration attends student and teacher meetings, visit our classes frequently, and are involved in our intervention programs – on site. With unification, would we lose the strength gained by our administrator knowing our student population so well? Administration also knows each teacher’s strengths and needs and is able to offer resources accordingly.


Lucerne and Upper Lake already have a principal/superintendent position in which they “wear many hats.” If we were to unify, a superintendent position would need to be created, adding another cost. In the students’ best interests, we would still need to have on-site administrators.


3) How will allocation of resources be decided?


Teachers from larger county districts have complained to us that we have more professional development opportunities and more access to current technology. We appreciate having current technology available as well as the opportunities we have for professional growth. We know that having appropriate resources and teacher training is crucial to providing students with the best possible education.


4) What about financial responsibilities?


Our district has made appropriate sacrifices to make our district financially responsible. We do not want to merge with other districts and put our school at financial risk.


Although Lucerne teachers would probably be given a pay raise if unification happens, we wonder how this will financially impact a new unified district.

 

Our board has already given up their monthly stipends and district-paid health benefits, as it impacts our district’s general fund.


We already participate in contract sharing and cooperative purchases with the county and other districts. For instance, our buses are serviced through Upper Lake, and we share some support personnel with them.


It is our hope that this list serves to clarify both our feelings and concerns regarding what is at risk surrounding unification. We appreciate working with the students in Lake county and will always be willing to collaborate with other schools for the needs of students. Our students are unique and we work hard to provide the best programs possible for their education.


Tammy Saldana, Melissa Seymour, Kathy Hughes, Christa Mott, Catherine Davenport, Laura Ewing, Stella Winckler, Megan Grant, Merilee Krieg, Venus Kuintzle, Ron Hale, Jen Wangberg and Doreen Walstad are teachers at Lucerne Elementary School.

Trackback(0)
Comments (10)Add Comment
I am confused.
written by bearer, November 20, 2009
2. How would adding a super without subtracting the current staff affect the students?

You folks do a good job, Kudos to you.

...
written by yellowwing, November 21, 2009
It is 'all about me' - why not think on a broader scale....when all schools are under one umbrella then the 'sharing' would benefit the children.

There is far too much overhead with so many individual districts...and all that administration.
I hope things have improved at Lucerne
written by Donna Christopher, November 21, 2009
since I interdistrict transfered my kids to ULES. The really big shocker was when the youngest got to the High School and we were told no kids from UL would be getting science classes that year as they had to get the kids from Lucerne 'caught up'.smilies/shocked.gif So we spent 6 weeks the following summer going over to the college in Ukiah for the biology class & lab.
Consolidation must be looked at but the bigger overlay in education for this nation is a National Curriculum. We are getting our behinds handed to us by the rest of the world. Sure there are some excellent schools in this country. Do you know how awful that is to state? It should be America Has Excellent Schools!
it's all about us, er, I mean the kids...
written by smurf, November 21, 2009
how many school boards do they have, and what do those cost to run? Superintendents are the most overpaid and underworked people in the system, that's why they should either be part time, paid less or we should get more work out of them. I think a small district could be run without one if they had a decent school board that didn't need to be spoon-fed and if they had a good staff.
If it were up to me I'd probably leave Middletown and Konocti alone unless they wanted to merge, the north shore districts would combine and so would KV -Lakeport, I'm certain that would save several hundred thousand dollars every year.
Phil you are out of your area here...
written by herb, November 21, 2009
I can tell you that the superintendent of the Konocti School District works 10 hours a day 6 or 7 days a week. When he is not officially working, he is writing articles about our district or speaking at funtions for is or working at the safe house or putting on a benefit for some kid related cause. He is paid well and earns every penny of it.
It would be me talking about how easy pear farmers have it and how overpaid they are. I can't make that statement because I have no idea. You have no clue what it takes to run a school district. There is no way he could take on another district full of problems without every student in both district having their educations compromised.
Points Well Taken
written by futhark, November 22, 2009
Now we need to get busy creating an educational paradise by de-unifying the four unified school districts in the county. Let's see, each high school district encompassing two elementary districts...so instead of the four unified districts we would have 12 separate elementary and high school districts. Balkanization leads to empowerment! Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds! The de-unified elementary districts could retain their surplus revenue instead of sharing it with the more-expensive-to-run-per-student high schools, boost their teacher salaries and get all kinds of goodies for the kids, while the high schools languished and decayed. Lake County kids would have the best 8th grade education money could buy! What do you say, Kelseyville, Lakeport, Middletown, and Konocti? Will you join the movement to de-unify? You have nothing to lose but your high schools!
It costs...
written by herb, November 23, 2009
each kid in my school district about 70 bucks a year to have a school board and a superintendent. How much education would you get in exchange for giving up local control of your schools to a Lakeport bureaucracy.
Consolidating services like bus maintenance and food purchasing are money savers. Consolidating districts (other than maybe the tiny ones that serve the same kids at different stages of teir educations,) doesn't save a lot of money.
Unify NOW
written by fubarbrothersband, November 25, 2009
Lucerne and Upper Lake already have a principal/superintendent position in which they “wear many hats.” If we were to unify, a superintendent position would need to be created, adding another cost. In the students’ best interests, we would still need to have on-site administrators.
This statement is ludicrous!There are 3 Principal/Superintendant positions in our district. Brown is the PS of a one school district. Many hats? Each PS get a bonus for being a Super as well as a pricipal. If Lakeport and UL unied there would only be a need for ONE,! COUNT for both districts. When my kids went to LES, Ed Costa made 75k as a PS, while the Principal of the only NON PS school UL Middle School made onle 53k. Ther is mo need for 3 supers in this small area. UNIFY NOW!!!
'em ! super
Consolidation
written by CobbMt, November 29, 2009
is going to happen as the samll districts go belly up. Sonoma and Marin had small Districts fighting on Independence and stuff like that, but check and see as the number of students declined, Lake will substantially in the next 10 years as you will not be selling your home and moving someshere cheaper. So West Marin and Sonoma folded their tent with nilly a whisper as gentrification happens here too. The bigger picture is no new housing in Lake, seen any new homes being built! See the crowds at Kelseyville Lumber. Not and this will take the small districts down fast as they have to budget years in advance.smilies/smiley.gif
Gentrification
written by fubarbrothersband, November 30, 2009
Ask the local gentry. they will say it's elementary.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 0.36084198951721 Seconds