Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Games

Arcade
Sudoku
EXCLUSIVE: DA's race takes shape early as Anderson announces challenge to Hopkins PDF Print E-mail
Written by Elizabeth Larson   
Wednesday, 26 August 2009

Image
From left, Lakeport attorney Don Anderson says he'll challenge District Attorney Jon Hopkins in the 2010 election. Photo of Anderson by Elizabeth Larson; Hopkins photo courtesy of the Lake County District Attorney's Office.

 



LAKEPORT – Although the November 2010 election is more than a year away, the race for Lake County's district attorney post already is taking shape.


In an exclusive interview granted to Lake County News, Lakeport attorney Don Anderson this week announced that he'll challenge incumbent District Attorney Jon Hopkins in the 2010 election.


Hopkins, 63, also confirmed to Lake County News this week that he'll seek reelection next year.


“I'm going do it again in 2010,” said Hopkins, who was elected in 2006 after running unopposed.


Anderson, 57, who was a deputy sheriff for 15 years before getting into law 20 years ago, said of his reasons for running, “It's just disheartening to see what Lake County has been through over the last several years, especially recently.”


High profile cases like the trial of Bismarck Dinius have hurt the county's reputation, he said, noting that the Dinius case contributed to his decision to run. In fact, Anderson visited the courtroom many times during the trial to watch how it unfolded.


He added, however, that the problems that he sees in the District Attorney's Office “were there long before the Dinius case.”


Responding to Anderson's challenge, Hopkins said opponents in race bring in better community participation. “And that's always a good thing, I think,” he said.


However, Hopkins – who has 37 years of experience in the criminal justice system – is giving no quarter when it comes to how he runs his agency. While Anderson is criticizing Hopkins for how he handles his department, Hopkins replies with criticism of Anderson that focuses on lack of prosecutorial experience.


Anderson says he sees system from both sides


Anderson said he has support from law enforcement and his law colleagues in choosing to run.


He said his longterm girlfriend Jennifer McGee is all for his decision to seek the district attorney job. “She's been encouraging me to do this for some time,” he said.


Anderson also has the support of his four daughters, two stepsons and 11 grandchildren.


He's not new to campaigns, having run for sheriff in 1994 among a field of five. Anderson came in third in that race, which was won by Rod Mitchell. Next year, Mitchell also is facing a challenge from Francisco Rivero, who has announced his plans to seek the sheriff's post.


Anderson, who has lived in Lakeport since his family moved here when he was a junior in high school, also gained a place in local law enforcement history in 1981 when – following a shootout – he helped capture a couple who shot and killed another deputy sheriff, Richard Helbush.


Annika Ostberg Deasy, who was sentenced to prison in California, was returned to her native Sweden earlier this year, a decision made by federal and state authorities that had concerned both Hopkins and Anderson, as Lake County News reported.


As he's pursued a career in law, Anderson has focused on civil and family litigation as well as criminal defense cases.


One of the strongest attributes in his favor, according to Anderson, is that he's seen the system from both sides – both as a deputy and as an attorney.


As a former deputy, “I know what it's like on the street,” said Anderson.


As an attorney, he's worked on high-profile cases involving police officers, such as former Lakeport Police Officer Richard Erickson, who was acquitted of several charges including allegations that he had misappropriated government funds.


He also represented Shavon Vestal in her suit against the city of Clearlake and the Clearlake Police Department. Vestal's father, David Vestal, was shot to death in June of 2008 during a confrontation with Clearlake Police. Shavon Vestal had sought $32 million; the case recently settled, with the city's insurance carrier paying Vestal $125,200, while her young son received $25,100 and her boyfriend $15,100.


Anderson said he wants to bring back the integrity the office had under former district attorneys Robert Crone and Stephen Hedstrom, both of whom went on to be judges. When Crone and Hedstrom headed the agency, they made their charging decisions based on good reasons, said Anderson.


Currently the District Attorney's Office is charging cases that never should have been charged – and not charging cases that should be prosecuted, said Anderson.


The kinds of problems Anderson cites appeared in the Dinius case, during which the prosecution handing over 119 pages of discovery evidence on the morning the trial started. He said other defense attorneys have shared with him the same problem, which Anderson said illustrates an attitude of wanting to win a case no matter what.


Anderson said he would continue the District Attorney's Office's practice of pursuing grants to support its operations, but he cautions that putting too much emphasis on grants can mean that the money ends up dictating what gets charged.


Addressing questions about his experience, Anderson said he's done many trials and has a good win record.


“It's much harder to defend a case than to prosecute a case,” Anderson said.


In order to build a better relationship with the public, “First you have to change the whole philosophy of the department,” Anderson said.


That would include giving deputy district attorneys more power to resolve cases. Anderson said deputy district attorneys currently have little power to take such actions.


It's important for a district attorney to have confidence in his or her deputies, and Anderson said the District Attorney's Office has a lot of very good young prosecutors.


Hopkins emphasizes decades of experience


Hopkins said he knows the complexities of running a prosecutor's office, and has 24 years of prosecutorial management. His agency this year has a $3.8 million budget.


He said he's also worked as a public defender, and represented thousands of people in that capacity while working in Los Angeles.


“I have a lot of empathy and compassion for the people charged with crimes,” Hopkins said.


An Ohio native, Hopkins is a father of three and grandfather whose early career included seven years as a public defender in Los Angeles County before he moved to Santa Cruz in 1979.


There, he worked as an assistant district attorney and a chief deputy district attorney for seven years before taking the executive director's position with the California District Attorney's Association for a year.


In 1987 he returned to the Santa Cruz County District Attorney's Office as a chief deputy. He was loaned out to the Lake County District Attorney's Office for a homicide case in 1998.


Later – after an unsuccessful application to take on that county's district attorney's job when it was vacated – he and wife, Annette, made the move to Lake County permanently, where he was the No. 2 man in District Attorney Gary Luck's office.


In 2006 he was elected district attorney.


Hopkins has taught for the National College of District Attorneys and the California District Attorneys Association, as well as the Hastings College of Criminal Advocacy.


“I feel like what I'm trying to accomplish here is basically take a farm team from the minors into the majors because of all the young people we've got, because we can't attract experienced people with the low wages that we pay,” he said.


Hopkins said he has a lot of experience with supplemental revenue in the form of grants, and experience with personnel issues in the prosecutor's office.


He also points to “heavy duty, major trial experience.”


An important skill is to be able to teach less-experienced prosecutors so they are ready to take on the cases that are important to the community, said Hopkins.


Lake County doesn't have a lot of violent offenders, but when they do appear, the District Attorney's Office needs to do a good job at prosecuting them, said Hopkins.


Earlier this week Hopkins told Lake County News that he doesn't intend to apply to succeed Judge Arthur Mann, who announced Monday that he's stepping down from his post in Lake County Superior Court's Department 3 effective Nov. 1. Hopkins said that's because he's happiest as a prosecutor.


While Hopkins brings heavyweight credentials and qualifications to his post, he's also prone to the weaknesses that can come with incumbency – including the baggage of unpopular prosecutions.


While he ran unopposed in 2006, the situation for the coming election early on promises to be much different.


Hopkins is at the lowest ebb of his political popularity since arriving in the county, due in no small part to the public outcry over the Dinius case.


He's been roundly criticized both locally and by sailboat enthusiasts around the world for prosecuting Dinius and not Russell Perdock, the off-duty sheriff's chief deputy whose powerboat was traveling at high speed in nighttime conditions when it hit the sailboat Dinius was piloting.


Hopkins said he couldn't convict Perdock based on the evidence available to him, and in an interview last week maintained his belief that the lights on the sailboat Dinius was piloting were off.


Some community members have stated an intention not to wait until next year's election, but to begin a recall petition on Hopkins immediately.


In 2007 he and Sheriff Rod Mitchell both refused to sign on to a countywide ethics policy for department heads, citing First Amendment concerns and the code's prohibition against becoming involved in supervisorial elections, as Lake County News has reported.


Hopkins also was the source of severe criticism for prosecuting San Franciscan Renato Hughes for two counts of homicide in connection with the December 2005 shooting deaths of his two friends, Christian Foster and Rashad Williams.


The three had allegedly broken into the home of Clearlake Park resident Shannon Edmonds, looking for marijuana. During the break-in 17-year-old Dale Lafferty, son of Edmond's then-girlfriend Lori Tyler, was beaten nearly to death and suffered permanent brain damage.


On the stand in the trial – which was moved to Contra Costa County due to pre-trial publicity – Edmonds testified that he shot at Foster and Williams in the back as they ran from his home.


The case came to be cast in racial terms, as Edmonds is white and the other men black. Despite Edmonds' admission to shooting Foster while he was down, Hopkins did not prosecute Edmonds. He did charge Hughes with murder under the provocative act, a law that's not often used but that allows a person involved in a crime that could yield a lethal response to be charged with murder for any deaths that result.


Leaders with the state's chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People protested the prosecution on the steps of the courthouse in Lakeport.


Hopkins won burglary and assault with a firearm convictions on Hughes, who a jury acquitted of the murder charges.


He maintains that he can't base his department's course on public sentiment.


“There are a lot of aspects to this job that don't strike the eye,” he said. “You have to be able to make judgment calls without bending to outside influences.”


Those influence include local people of standing or – in the age of connectivity – people speaking out on blogs, he explained.


“You need to be able to make decisions without worrying about political implications,” said Hopkins. “That's a very tall order because people want to have things done their way.”


Hopkins added, “The minute you bend to that you've lost your independence, you've lost your objectivity, you've lost your professionalism.”


He said decisions have to be made based on an obligation to the county's residents.


“I'm very proud of the fact that I've actually gone to battle in those types of cases against the odds and sent dangerous people away, protecting the community,” Hopkins said.


What's next for the hopefuls


A 2010 election calendar issued by the Lake County Registrar of Voters Office notes that the petition for signatures in lieu of a filing fee must be filed between Jan. 4 and Feb. 25.


Declaration of candidacy and nomination papers will follow, between Feb. 16 and March 12, with the extension period for nomination papers lasting from March 13 to March 17 – in the case an eligible incumbent doesn't file.


Hopkins said he has many plans ahead as he seeks a second term. He said he has much more to do that requires another term to complete.


“I started out to achieve a lot here,” he said, adding that he wants to take that a lot further.


He said his goal is to build an office that has obvious leadership succession, which includes grooming not just a successor for others who have the training to take on difficult tasks.


“The DA can't do it all,” he said, noting there are many complicated aspects to leadership.


Anderson said his main focus now will be listening to the community.


“I really would like to get input back from the community,” about both problems and solutions, said Anderson.


Anderson can be contacted at his office at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it or 707-263-1775. Hopkins' office can be reached at 707-263-2251 or through the Lake County District Attorney's Web page, www.co.lake.ca.us/Government/Directory/District_Attorney.htm .


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews .

Trackback(0)
Comments (50)Add Comment
I can't wait
written by Sandy Shores, August 26, 2009
To find out more about this candidate. I'm intrigued by his experience in law enforcement and as a defense attorney - interesting combination - might be a direction we as a community should explore. This will be interesting to say the least.
sailboat enthusiasts around the world are following this election too.
written by b393capt, August 26, 2009
"Hopkins ... in an interview last week maintained his belief that the lights on the sailboat Dinius was piloting were off."

As a sailboating enthusiast I am outraged that Hopkins continues to hold onto his belief that the navigation rules don't apply to Purdock because Purdock and other witnesses on the recklessly fast power boat (and no other witnesses) didn't see the lights on the sailboat.

The lights on all boats are of very low intensity. Why won't Hopkins believe that the witnesses on the boat (a) experienced a loss of night vision / experienced a loss of vision for other reasons caused by 45 mph of wind in their face (b) are not reliable witnesses after being caught by the defense in multiple lies the night of the accident.

Hopkins winning at all costs approach to the case, which included misquoting witnesses in his summation, misrepresenting state and federal laws on boating navigation rules (the overtaking boat must give the boat ahead right of way / the right of way boats only responsibility is to hold course (Hopkins stated the sailboat should have avoided which is wrong on so many levels), providing documentation to the defense the day of the trial, and attempting to falsely discredit the only real outside expert in the case with misleading information about wires after the judge ruled he couldn't bring that into the case last minute.

Hopkins has made all boat owners fearful that some powerboater in the future will use the Purdock/Hopkins method of avoiding responsibility for collisions on the water with false claiming lights were not on.
Hopkins................
written by fubarbrothersband, August 26, 2009
The lights are on, nobody's home.
...
written by hlokity, August 26, 2009
Give it up Hopkins, the lights were on. You wasted so much time and money going after the wrong man! You need to do the right thing and step down! I hope they go after you for pleading your entire case in the paper! You should not be able to practice law! You don't even believe in Innocent Until Proven Guilty! Which by the way would be the legal right of the accused in criminal trials, since you don't seem to know! Nothing like victimising the victim - right! I hope Don Anderson takes you in a LANDSLIDE! I know he's got my vote - anything has to be better than you! smilies/wink.gif
Just one of many.
written by James, August 26, 2009
A true Lake county phony. Despicable, his actions with the Dinius case. Talks out of both sides of his mouth. I have found his and others actions in this county to be intolerable.Dishonesty is rampant within this local government. This government is about them, for them and by them. With a grand jury that suits their purpose. No one to check on their lies, as they are the arbitrators of complaints concerning them. Go ahead Locke tell me it ain't so.
...
written by yellowwing, August 26, 2009
Local people who don't believe driving a boat while drunk will also be watching this election....but we get to vote.
and once again...
written by lenny, August 26, 2009
He maintains that he can't base his department's course on public sentiment.

“There are a lot of aspects to this job that don't strike the eye,” he said. “You have to be able to make judgment calls without bending to outside influences.”

Those influence include local people of standing or – in the age of connectivity – people speaking out on blogs, he explained.

“You need to be able to make decisions without worrying about political implications,” said Hopkins. “That's a very tall order because people want to have things done their way.”

Hopkins added, “The minute you bend to that you've lost your independence, you've lost your objectivity, you've lost your professionalism.”


and I contend that he is CORRECT! That is how that office should be run. However, I am one of the community that knows and blogs that our District Attorney has made HUGE errors and needs to go....

I used Don several years ago. I found him to be professional, helpful and on point. He's got my vote.
Please
written by calcuby, August 26, 2009
vote for Don. Hopkins is a terrible DA.
Suspect GOB
written by cantdrive55, August 26, 2009
It's clear now for all you GOB blamers, Hopkins is a city-boy, he's only been here 10 years! That definatley doesn't qualify him as a GOB, heck you gotta be at least 2d generation to be considered local. He says he's a pro, that's not for me to decide, but whatever else you say about him please don't confuse him with the good local folk who are really GOOD Old Boys!
...
written by writingrammy, August 26, 2009
Perhaps we should elect a district attorney who has no ties to local law enforcement or politial ties. Better for the county
How about
written by Greg_Cornish, August 26, 2009
We just recall him before the election. Then we can have a real election.
You may be on to something can't drive -
written by Donna Christopher, August 26, 2009
perhaps he is but a mere toady for the GOBs. Call it what you want as long as we also call it GONE!
...
written by BG__Locke, August 26, 2009
It ain't so. smilies/grin.gif
We're in trouble
written by JDZBC, August 26, 2009
I've seen Anderson in action and he was awful. I served on a jury where he was defending and he stammered, stuttered, and was extremely condescending to everyone else in the room. Not to mention he was just plain creepy. He's going to be Hopkins Part II.
Don
written by bernadette, August 26, 2009
is a pretty good guy. I wish him luck.
DDA Langan
written by dogwalker, August 26, 2009
Might be an option, but the fellow lacks social skills. Saw him at the Lakeport Main Street function and said Hello and he recoiled. Maybe he felt ashamed at his role in the Dinius case? I dunno. I will campaign for Rivero, for sure.
Woopie!
written by Wally, August 26, 2009
Good luck Donnie, I used to work for Lee Jeffords (Knocti Security)And excelled by taking part in classes given by Bucholtz back in the 80's. I remember you and you were always a good person. Lee really liked you alot. This was back in the 80's. I now have a degree in Admin. Of Justice and currently working as a Public Safety Officer for Catholic Healthcare West In Sacramento CA. I was the only African American working in security at that time.
Best to you and your Family.
Wally Hawkins
Congratulations
written by Shadowknows, August 26, 2009
Very happy to hear of Mr. Andersons decision. After the disgrace in the court room by Hopkins, a change is needed.
This DA closed his eyes to an unsolved murder of nearly seven years, to what? Prosecute an innocent man and look away from a Police Officer who should have been charged instead. The LaForge killer is on the lose and what has our DA done, NOTHING but flipped the switch on his own lights to the off position.
I'm behind you Mr. Anderson. Good Luck.
Ties
written by barticle, August 26, 2009
smilies/grin.gif
Speaking of political ties, Anderson should get rid of his blue necktie and get himself a red power tie like the one Hopkins wears.
...
written by Danihuck, August 26, 2009
I've known Don since I was a child. My family can't say enough good things about him. He cares about this county and the people who reside here. This man actually has morals and integrity...good change for this county. Go Donnie! We are behind you 100%!smilies/cheesy.gif
Locke.
written by James, August 26, 2009
If that was your reply. Then You Sir are misguided. I would direct you to read the first amendment of our constitution. The one you took a oath to defend. I say did the grad jury expose supervisor Lewis over the phone use? NO they did not. You are no more than one that aides this local government to lie and hide the lies. Lets see if Mr.Jerry Brown will do anything. I have said give me a honest investigation and if I be the liar charge me with perjury. These are the same people involved with Dinius case. You are dishonest when you hear only one side and not the other. So you ask just like them."Birds of a feather"
need more candidates for DA & sheriff office
written by janicekempf, August 26, 2009
I don't know anything about Mr. Anderson or Mr. Rivero, I'm sure they are good men from other posts here, but I hope we have more candidates and then we need to have public debates so we can actually hear them and judge their merit properly. Right now my opinion is: anyone but Hopkins and Mitchell! This county needs a good purging!
James get more cheese
written by cantdrive55, August 26, 2009
To go with that WHINE! You've been sawing that fiddle for years and no one is listening, Yes Lewis was outed by the Grand Jury and yes you got local government to establish a universal complaint form for all departments; BUT if any of your other allegations were true surely one honest attorney would have moved your case through to fruition just so we wouldn't have to hear you whine every time you think you have an audience. So many lies, so little time, its really hard to tell who is lying now. No facts to support your case, none ever seen or heard or written about, only caluminations against persons you deem suitable.
cantdrive 55.
written by James, August 26, 2009
You know where you can go. This government did not have a complaint form for a 148 years. A citizen should not have had to raise hell about it. So I express my rights under the constitution and its whining. You are just one reason the Dinius case had such a uproar. I state the truth and the facts have been said but to this point those that I complain about are the arbitrators. We will see if Mr. Jerry Brown will look at this. You think what you will. I know that I'm right. Lewis was not outed by the grand jury, look the report up is on line. See if you can find his name.When those in this government lie their power to hide is awesome.
Recall
written by a guest, August 26, 2009
Need to do one to keep up Public Opinion. I count 22 votes in my extended family, and I always get out the vote.

Hoppie is history. He has brought out all the bad things in Lake County in the publics eye. And all he got was a black eye.

I will send money when the time comes. smilies/smiley.gif
Constitutional expressions
written by cantdrive55, August 26, 2009
James you are hilarious. Gee you, me, everyone, we all knew it was Lewis, the GJ isn't supposed to file charges, that's up to the DA's office. Speaking of them, you never state anything except you've been slighted, no facts, no truths, no citations for review. And if you are waiting for Jerry to bail you out, if Brown can't find his way here to save a sailor he's certainly not going to be able to help someone who cannot speak even the simple facts. If Hopkins and Sheriff Mitchell can write commentaries and get Elizabeth to print them then you could put facts, dates, names, and allegations together and fall in their footsteps. Everyone should get their chance in the sun, maybe its your turn now. I know I ask for this every six months and am certainly patient since you have never stated any facts or truths in the last 30 months, why not start now!
Once Again, I Told You So!
written by Sphynx Queen, August 26, 2009
Hey Wow & Duh and the rest of the Delusional Morons...
Remember about 3 weeks ago I posted that a friend of mine was going to run against Hopkins and you said, "Yea Right!".. Well here you go.. I told you so!! YET AGAIN!

I have known Donny for about 10 years. Both Professionally and Personally. I have recommended him to my friends. In the past, I entrusted Don with a very complex case, and he took it and ran, with a better than expected outcome. I have trusted this Man with the future of the most precious thing in the world to me. I cant say enough good things about him. I love his dry sideways humor and his personality. He does not walk around like other Attorneys do like they have a Stick Up their Asszzz.

He has worked as a Sheriff years ago, and in fact is the one who apprehended the Killers of Deputy Hellbush. He knows both sides of the Law. I do not consider Donny as one of the Good Old Boys, as I have talked at length with him about different Deputys/Officers, and he is very straight forward with common sense, and right from wrong. So.. No doubt, you guys get the point.. Don Anderson is just the type of DA we need. I have seen him in court, in action, and he is great.. he can rip someone a new asszzzhole and the person not even know it. The people that say negative things about him, are usually the ones who he has won judgements against. Oh Well! The only Attorney in this town I have seen that is unprofessional, is our Current Baffoon of a DA... "UUHHHH HOLD ON, I CANT FIND MY NOTES, I CANT READ WHAT I WROTE, UHHH DUHHHH". At this point my Retarded Bulldog would make a better DA. Atleast she has personality!! But Lake County has just struck Gold with ANDERSON coming out for DA and RIVERO for Sheriff!

For those who don't know much about Deputy Francisco Rivero, Carol Staumback who was Lynn Thornton's Best Friend and Executor of her Estate, as some High Ranking close friends with SFPD. She got the Inside Scoop on Rivero, and they had nothing but Praise and Admiration for the Man. After having some very in depth conversations with Frank, In my Opinion, he stands for what I would want for a Sheriff. Honest, Equal Justice, Accountability and Respect. When you respect the Citizens, the Citizens will respect you. He seems Genuine, and "Old School"... where he may arrest you in the morning, but swing back by your house to feed and water your dog.
The Family of Lynn Thornton and the Sailing are backing Rivero for Sheriff.

Now Our Real Work Begins!!
Perdock and Perjury
written by Sphynx Queen, August 26, 2009
For those who feel that there has be an injustice in the Dinius Case, Please write the Sacramento DA's Office. Sacramento is where Perdock was on the Stand, Under Oath and "Testa-Lying" If you feel there should be further review, in order to get a very small amount of Justice for Lynn Thornton. Just mention the the facts that were revealed in the County of Lake vs Dinius Case, with Victor Haltom as the Defense Attorney. As we know DA Hopkin's will NEVER address this issue! But Sacramento will....
Please Address your Comments and Concerns to:
Sacramento DA Jan Scully
(916) 874-6218,
901 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Website: www.sacda.org
The case number is Sacramento County Superior Court # 06AS02445.
REsmilies/tongue.giferdock/Dinius/Thornton Case
smilies/cry.gif
cantdrive55
written by James, August 26, 2009
You said lewis was outed by the grand jury. He was not I had to get the information from the county. Only after it came out in the paper did people know. I have stated the facts on this site and the other sites. I have tried to get the word out. This government did not aide me with the contractors board as stated by Locke. The contractor lost his license He had to pay for the repairs. And all the time employees were covering up the lies started by them and when the board of supervisors knew about it they let the lies stand not to rock the boat. I say again give me a honest investigation and if I'm the liar charge me with perjury but if those that are to have oversight only looks at one side that's not justice or those that I accuse are the oversight where is the justice in that. I have sent this to the attorney generals office On a official form of complaint. What better time after this farce over the Dinius case. I have done this because those that are to govern used their power to protect themselves from the errors of dishonesty getting away from them. That's it in a nut shell. Have a good life.
James
written by BG__Locke, August 26, 2009
I didn't even live in the County when Lewis was in office, obviously though, I was involved from Indiana and it was a conspiracy that brought me out here!

Sorry to tell you, but you'll have to find someone else to blame all of your problems on, I'm moving back to Indiana next week. Surprisingly, I'm not going to miss you!

Have a good life.
...
written by To Poor To Pay Attention, August 26, 2009
There is no such thing in California law as a "civil" grand jury. California has historically had only "regular" grand juries and every county is required by the California Constitution to have one every year. The regular grand juries have always had two different functions: criminal and civil.
One function, the criminal one, is to hear evidence to determine whether in the grand jury’s view it is sufficient to warrant making an accused stand trial. Typically the District Attorney’s office decided who to accuse, on what charges and what evidence to bring to the attention of the grand jury. The District Attorney guided and advised the grand jury during its receipt of the evidence. The grand jury determined whether or not to issue an indictment. As discussed below, this indictment function has fallen into disuse in some, but not all, counties. In addition to standard criminal indictment activity, potentially included within the criminal function is the obligation of every regular grand jury to investigate “willful or corrupt misconduct in office of public officers of every description within the county. Whether or not a grand jury’s indictment function has fallen into disuse, this is a mandatory obligation and obviously may uncover
criminal activity.
Locke
written by James, August 27, 2009
The point with Lewis was the hiding the grand jury allowed. That the grand jury take's its marching orders for the same government it is to over see. I at no time stated you were the problem over the Lewis affair,only used as a example. I have only blamed you for your one sided justice. You as the jury foreman called me delusional because I used my right under the constitution. If you are going to do that you have a duty to tell both sides. You took the oath to defend the constitution not rules,regulations or other protocol set up. You should have kept your mouth shut,no you had to defend your waste of time and error in stating only one side. With your words and title gave credence to your lies. Then with that knowledge even now try to justify you actions. I have the names of all the jury members and have not called them out.Unlike you they allowed me my right to complain. I could care less that you are moving on but you fit right in with the rest of the liars. I say again its always after the fact when you find out a wrong has occurred, what you do to correct tells what you are. "Now you know" If you don't you are someone that has little ethics.
Thank you James
written by cantdrive55, August 27, 2009
Now I can leave you to your thoughts. So as a private person you hired a private contractor who didn't do what he was contracted to do, sounds like the county inspector said the work met code, you got your pound of flesh from the contractor but couldn't complain to the county because they had no "complaint form" for you to fill in the blanks. So they created one just for you and now everyone benefits from that exercise. I'm still missing where all the lies come in? Anyway thanks for the explanation. Be careful, if everyone lies to you then Bron is really not moving to Indiana, he's moving to north Lakeport into that little house on the corner of Hill Rd and Lakeshore thats for sale.

And, oh by the way, Lake County on impanels a Civil Grand Jury, regularly, every July.
Mr. Hopkins says.......
written by Shores_of_Kabatin, August 27, 2009
“I feel like what I'm trying to accomplish here is basically take a farm team from the minors into the majors because of all the young people we've got, because we can't attract experienced people with the low wages that we pay,” he said


Well I would say to that: if you don't appreciate us 'farmers' then better pack your bags and get back to your city of origin.

Low wages? I'm sure they are up to par for living in our great County, which is a much cheaper pace of living than in metropolitan areas, so our wages should be lower - the cost of living here is lower and part of the reason why many people live here! I wish voters would remember to try and vote for locally-based people for these positions (the kind of people that have lived here for more than a few years & shown commitment).

But he doesn't seem bothered by the huge amount of money he spent for the Dinius Trial. Dinius was drunk and unsafe, Perdock was unsafe - both of them have to live with the results of their foolishness - that's punishment enough. There never should have been a trial.

Thanks for killing off the last of our tourism, Mr. Hopkins, with the new boat patrols looking for drunks - and they didn't even get one! What were the costs our County paid for that farce a few weekends back? Were you looking to win brownie points with MADD for future work experience, or what? One, two, even three drinks does not make a drunkard, but according to our new drinking laws, it does. (One drink for average female now, within 1 hour, is drunk!) Ask any medical doctor what they know about levels of drunkeness - it's much higher than our newest drinking laws.

The good folks around here are scared to meet for a few drinks on the weekends, so many have lost a treasured social/community tradition and so many, in private, have voiced their unhappiness with the new political correctness that MADD has brought on, and that our DA was trying to hang Dinius with. The folks in rural communities really pay the price due to lack of available transportation for an evening of dinner, dancing, and comraderie. We have lost quite a few businesses due to this, mostly restaraunts - not to be confused with the new fast-food establishments replacing them. And for what? We've never had an outrageous number of people killed from drinking and driving compared to other types of vehicle accidents.

I remember when 2 of my high-school friend's mothers were killed while leaving a local dinnerhouse & lounge. They were backing up onto the street when a deputy came over the knoll speeding to some crime or accident without his sirens on. (Believe it or not, in those days the DA certainly didn't blame the dead women for the few drinks they had earlier at dinner, nor do I believe that the DA threw the book at the deputy?) When a friend (who recalled the deadly accident)recently told Clearlake's newest police chief that she was alarmed by officers going at break-neck speeds on Lakeshore without lights and/or sirens many times during the daytime, he told her that he attributed that to the officers being young and trying to make their records look good. At least, that was a very human remark made to her and an honest one. Why can't we be more honest in other areas?

Mr. Hopkins does, however, deserve credos for prosecuting the 3 thugs in Hughes trial.
Do your job
written by sailboat bob, August 27, 2009
Hey Hoppy, the only chance you have of getting reelected is to do your job. You said you couldn't charge perdock with speeding because there was no speed limit. Well now you have him dead to rights because of his perjury. What are you going to do? Are you going to man up and do your job or are you staying with the blue code.
Cantdrive 55>
written by James, August 27, 2009
First you know very little about this system.I know the civil grand jury begins each year. The lies Started when county employees covered up for the code inspector.Then the department head covered for office help. Then the board of supervisors covered for the department head. The grand jury is overseen by county counsel the same attorney that aides the board of supervisors. What has upset me is that after the fact when all knew they let the lies stand. The oath they took has no allowance for them to cover up errors in judgment. The complaint form came six years after the fact,not to aide me. There is a time you say enough is enough and I'm in believe the reason they do what they do is because Jerry isn't coming to tell them they can't.
Excuses by Sheriff's Office & Jon Hopkins STILL ring UNtrue.
written by Janice K., August 27, 2009
No matter what else has been stated, the FACT remains that the damage to the sailboat demonstrated excessive and illegal speeding on the part of the power boat.

Yet the operator of the power boat didn't get so much as a citation for unsafe boating.

For this reason alone, its time to fire the current DA... Jon Hopkins... by way of the next election.

Message to Russell Perdock
written by Janice K., August 27, 2009
Mr. Perdcock,

I hold out all hope that you are served with civil litigation for your excessive speeding on the lake at a time of day when your ability to CLEARLY see the water directly in front of you was impaired due to the hours just prior to or at sundown.

While the attorney's might continue their hair splitting debates about whether you were within your rights to be speeding at the time of day, the rest of us..... the general public.... can see from the photos of the boat damages that you were at fault.

You killed an innocent boater.

YOU are guilty.

And for the rest of you people out there who think that speeding your overpowered watercraft on the lake is within your "rights," think again. Your "rights" don't include unsafe boating. Your "rights" don't include speeding close to non motorized boats (kayaks, sailboats, canoes, rafts). Your "rights" don't include making as much loud noise as you can with your childish worship of loud ski boat engines.

Russell Perdock is but one example of the man-child on the lake.

We don't need your kind around here any longer.
Off topic?
written by attorneyguy, August 27, 2009
Didn't this thread start out as comments about Jon Hopkins and/or Don Anderson? The vitrol expressed by many about Perdock has its place, but staying on topic might be more interesting. The Dinius/Perdock story is still posted, and that comment thread is still accessible. Perhaps many of the recent comments should go there, so we can learn about the candidate(s) or comments on them, rather than about a trial now concluded much to most people's satisfaction. Of course, I don't know a single sole, except perhaps for Hopkins, who predicted otherwise.
Don Anderson says he has the support of law enforcement. Really? I look forward to seeing names of current law enforcement attached to his campaign. Based on those names, it might help his campaign, or might be "damning with faint praise."
Jimmy boy...
written by BG__Locke, August 27, 2009
You know what James, since I am leaving anyway, I've decided to just tell it like it is. I have never, repeat never lied about anything period. To call me a liar is slander sir and unless you have physical evidence I may just sue and get custody of that stupid sign of yours.

As for the others jurors, they did as instructed. I told them to judge for themselves and they did. A full panel rejected your complaint, not once, not twice, but at least FOUR times! Gee, amazing how at least 70 people refuse your complaint, even two years before I was part of the jury, but I'm the only one responsible!

Lastly, you are obviously mentally ill, everyone knows that. There, I said it. Have you ever noticed that everytime you post it ends up with negative votes? Pay attention! People are sick of your ramblings. Your problem with me is that I was the only one who would say what everyone thinks, oops I did it again.

You make up bogus claims about me and spew lies and then call me a liar, real good there genius. So, I can say, YOU are a LIAR since I never lied nor covered-up anything in my life and you say I did. So, how does it feel? I have just proven that YOU are a liar. IF you have some proof of what you claim, in that I failed to uphold my oath, please scan it in and show the world, I'd like to see it!

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone...sorry to say James, you aren't even in the line to throw! How does it feel to have someone call you a LIAR? Feels good to me since I KNOW that you are one.

Indiana here I come! Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty I'm free at last!
Locke
written by James, August 28, 2009
Bring it on you liar. You Gave the lying bureaucrats side only. You are the one that started this. I say again you used your power as the jury foreman to go public and call me names.Don't go before you sue me. All you words change not a thing the grand jury is overseen by this local government. I have said before and I say it again With out a investigation by those that oversee to my complaints my rights have been abridged. I know who I am, I know who you are.The same that would use Mr.Dinius to cover for one of their own so you aide to cover for bureaucrats that lied. So please sue then I will get my day in the sun and if I am the liar then charge me with perjury.The fact remains You only give one side. the grand jury is overseen by this government. I have rights and you justify there denial. This is not only your government but mine and so far it has been one sided. Those I knew did not no die for this crap they would rise and demand their life back. I know what the oath is and it was to protect the constitution, that was why you were asked to take it.We have those that let a error get out of hand then chose to use government power to hide the lies of those they trusted.So sue if you believe that calling you a liar is in error.
Enough
written by Community Loyal, August 28, 2009
First, I pologize to those reading this thread as my post will be off topic as well.

James, what does Bron Locke have to do with Don Anderson seeking election? The answer is nothing. What does he have to do with Jon Hopkins poor decisions? Again the answer is nothing. You have a personal vendetta against a man who has done nothing but give three years of his life to the betterment of the County. He's done nothing to you personally, I served with him on the Grand Jury and I personally voted against accepting your complaint. (Sorry Bron, I know we aren't supposed to talk about what happens in the jury room.) I watched while a unanimous vote was taking and Bron obstained, it wasn't he that felt your complaints had no merit it was all of us.
If I'm write, I think that cantdrive55 served with Bron for two years as well and can attest that no one in the history of the Grand Jury gave more of himself than Bron did. This man worked 30-50 hours a week, AS A VOLUNTEER! I happen to know for a fact that one week he worked over 70 hours and once worked over 20 hours straight.
I'm sick to know we are losing someone who fought to better our County and had the citizens best interest at heart and we are keeping someone who is as selfish as James Henderson who only cares about his own personal agenda. James, from this moment on, stop putting blame on Bron Locke. He is a good man and you have no right to say otherwise because you don't even know him. Oh and by the way, I was at the courthouse in July of 2007 when he met you face to face outside the BOS Chambers and listened to you, he encouraged you to file a complaint even though you had past frustrations with the Grand Jury. HE brought your complaint to us and gave it full attention. You've bit a hand that tried to help you.

Best of luck in the future Bron, unlike James, there are a lot of people who are going to miss you here.
Community Loyal.
written by James, August 28, 2009
First, you have not heard a word I have said.Only the rattling of your mind because you are offended. You chose to hear only what you believe is true. To have a conversation with you as Barney Frank would say is like talking with a table.
Mr. Locke, were you being facitious when you said
written by Donna Christopher, August 28, 2009
you didn't even live in Lake County during Gary's dialing for daliance daze? Gotta be a joke. If not, then do explain how someone moves here from the middle of the country and immediately gets put on the Grand Jury. Then puts in the time on the GJ and once done, heads back to the middle of the county. If true methinks me smells a carpetbagger. I know the ethics complaint that a D3 former supervisor, myself and another D3 resident filed about Gary's ethical lapses during the 06 campaign were given to Anita who didn't think the laws had been broken but felt it needed to be reviewed by the DA in order to avoid the appearance of impropriety. Then BOS Chair Farrington said he would forward said complaint to the DA's office. It was then pointed out to him that the DA's association had endorsed Gary and that his wife worked in the DA's office - if we were trying to avoid the appearance of impropriety it should go to the AG. I'm sure Tony had a garbage can he lovingly called AG as nothing was heard after that. Notwithstanding the voices on election day - that was heard loud and clear.
To all.
written by James, August 28, 2009
Why would my word seem to ring untrue to your ears? You have just witness the dishonesty of bureaucrats with in this local government. That farce was the Dinius case were they put a person through hell to save one of their own. I have for years told you who,what when,where and why.The short of it, you had employees that lied and other bureaucrats the aided with the cover up of the lies. I found that highly offensive
To all.
written by James, August 28, 2009
and with that intolerance for persons to use the power of government to hide the lies I have said so. Mr.Locke used his name as jury foreman to call me names thus adding weight to his words as if to be true.When in fact only gave the governments side and not mine. All that took the oath of office are held to a higher standard as the overseer to our constitution. I say again there is only one reason I have not received that investigation and that is to keep those bureaucrats from being exposed. You can believe or not. Lastly I have only called Mr.Locke to task because He chose to state the lies with out stating my side. I am sure that honest people gave of them self with only the desire to do good and I have never said otherwise. The Grand jury is only the lapdog for this local government. The Lewis offer affair was used to make that point. Thank you.
Move
written by BG__Locke, August 29, 2009
Hi Donna,

I moved here in November 2004. Joined the Grand Jury in July 2006, well past the required year of residency. Now, one of my children that lives in Indiana needs me so I am going back. (Not that it is really anyone's business.) I didn't pay attention to local polictics when I initially moved here, didn't really know the details of the cell phone incident until I read Grand Jury's report and joined GJ. Sick of being accused of BS, first James and hie liar accusations now you with carpetbagger accusations. Unbelievable how people here have to think the worst about people.
Lock e
written by James, August 29, 2009
Your the on that came out of your garbage bag and called me names. Then on top of that you told the bureaucrats lies and used you name a title to verify as if your words were true. to this day have not ask to see the proof with letters and document. No you just keep defending one side of this mess. Have you ever asked yourself,why I would carry on as I do. I can assure you I have been scrutinized by this government and not been 5150. Your actions have been offensive to say the least. You have no awareness the reason or your obligation for that oath you took. I can assure you I understand those words I swore to and know that the young men that gave their all would rise and demand their life back. So you chastise me for my right to complain,you may not like what I say but that is my right. I state again you did not need to involve yourself in this matter and could have stayed anonymous and stated your views. No you had to make it personal. So please sue you lying sack of garbage or crawl back to you bag. For all that would judge and be honest about it I give you the Dinius case that this county has just gone though. Surprise's are to come.I thank you that care to know and the others you know where you can go.
Congratulations and Good Luck Don
written by Irishfreewoman, August 29, 2009
So glad you are taking up this endeavor in service to our community. May you have the luck of the Irish (more the full blooded than mine!, although the guy in Yuba County hasn't done so bad! Mr. McGrath!). Best wishes, Saoirse
James
written by Community Loyal, August 29, 2009
Bron's gone, he lesft for Indy today, you can stop talking to yourself now. He said to personally tell you goodbye from him though.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 08 September 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Choose language

Related Items

Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 1.714301109314 Seconds