Comments for Council discusses what to do about information left out of general plan at http://lakeconews.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments http://lakeconews.com Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:41:17 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://lakeconews.com/content/view/6930/919/#comment-10220 City I\'d worked with, council rules allowed any council-member to move an item from \"consent\" or \"information\" only, to a public hearing. However if it had not been noticed as such it would require rescheduling. The item had evidently not been properly noticed even to the council members as Ms. Lyons was unaware of the content of the \"information\" to be presented and none could gauge the appropriatness of it being an information only item. As there seems to be some vague procedural issues yet to be ironed out (Lafco etc.) a rescheduling, as a public hearing seems in order and should cause no relative delay. If the Mayor wants to \"get off his butt\" he will so order so that the issue can move forward cleanly and fairly. - Tim Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:14:02 +0100 http://lakeconews.com/content/view/6930/919/#comment-10201 of Lakeport is very lucky Ms Lyons got elected. Good catch on your part ma\'am. Guys - try a flow chart that includes ALL necessary items. It is obvious we all have a great deal of work to do and find creative ways to do it. First Order Of Business - PAY ATTENTION. - Donna Christopher Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:29:12 +0100