Comments for Swetnam: Criticisms on ethics issues unfounded at http://lakeconews.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments http://lakeconews.com Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:55:41 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://lakeconews.com/content/view/4178/927/#comment-4703 Cliff is appointed, not elected, and I have endorsed every current BOS member except Jeff Smith at one time or another, so the gripe about me being nothing but down on our elected reps is pretty weak. - smurf Tue, 13 May 2008 14:20:55 +0100 http://lakeconews.com/content/view/4178/927/#comment-4695 Since I am not \'smurf\' you really have got to fix whatever causes the comments entry box to open with someone elses username. I may be wrong but I expect that \'smurf\' would appear to apologize if I just sent \"I am so very sorry that I always negatively attack our elected representatives\" probably anonymous? - smurf Tue, 13 May 2008 07:41:48 +0100 http://lakeconews.com/content/view/4178/927/#comment-4694 Mr. Swetnam - why would you even respond to anything Murphy says? Anyone who has any type of contact with Murphy knows he often talks out of his big toe! - yellowwing Tue, 13 May 2008 07:27:33 +0100 http://lakeconews.com/content/view/4178/927/#comment-4693 I never said the PC had anything to do with a wine cave, all I said was it didn\'t seem to have much to do with disabled kids riding horses, making it one more reason the neighbors should be aware of exactly what the Van Ecks plans are. Don\'t know what \"facts\" Cliff thinks I\'m not aware of, if Cliff wants to see facts we can go back and examine his voting record on certain projects and see just how those facts stack-up, but he may not be too keen on any more public awareness/reveiw than we already have. - smurf Tue, 13 May 2008 07:16:41 +0100 http://lakeconews.com/content/view/4178/927/#comment-4692 First off Cliff, I certainly have never been any sort of wedge between you and anyone else, I don\'t even have an opinion on this project and said the system was working as it should-doesn\'t sound like too big a gripe right there. Second, I do have the opinion that your ethical judgement has swayed from time to time and the problem always seems to go back to the fact that you and your wife are so well socially connected that I believe it makes it hard for you to either do your job fairly or at least to maintain the appearance of it-people are always wondering what took place in private with you. I am also not the only one who has considered your assignment to the courthouse a plum, and I suppose we have to pay someone overtime to fill in for you-swell! And you have to admit those PC workloads vary a lot, and some of those meetings are pretty short-what\'s the average site visits per month per commissioner? .5? I\'ve got no beef witht the Van Ecks or their project, I just want the same standards applied and them treated like everyone else based on the law, not how many chareties they\'ve helped. I do have a beef with you Cliff, you\'ve made some bad decisions vote-wise on the PC and I\'ve been saying for some time you need to move-on, I\'m tired of trying to figure out what motivates those unwise choices. I did cross the line personal attack wise and I apologize for that, it was uncalled for and off topic anyway. Philip Murphy - smurf Tue, 13 May 2008 02:11:47 +0100